On TechRepublic: The 5 worst tech products of 2009
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Stefanie Olsen
Posted on ZDNet News: May 13, 2004 8:01:00 PM

A district court judge has rescinded a temporary restraining order against antispam operation SpamCop, in an early blow to a case brought by self-professed "Spam King" Scott Richter.

A Northern California District Court judge issued a temporary restraining order last week to prevent SpamCop from interfering with messages sent by alleged junk e-mailer OptInRealBig.com, whose owner and president is Richter.

The San Francisco court dissolved the order late on Tuesday, after SpamCop's owner, IronPort Systems, filed an appeal. IronPort, an e-mail server company, argued that the order breached its first amendment rights and damaged its operations. The court is scheduled to reconvene on May 20.

U.S. District Court Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong said she dissolved the order because she had not reviewed SpamCop's opposition papers before granting the restraint.

The dispute involves practices of SpamCop, an operator of an antispam blocklist that third parties use to block bogus mail. SpamCop fields people's complaints about unwanted mail and its senders, and then uses that information to list the Internet Protocol addresses used to send the messages.

Richter sued IronPort and SpamCop on April 29 for allegedly interfering with his business and causing Internet service providers to block his company's e-mail. The suit also charged SpamCop with not disclosing the identity of people who complain about its e-mail, thereby aiding potential violations of the Can-Spam Act, which requires the removal of recipients from future mailings, if they so choose.

The San Francisco court's temporary restraining order had prevented SpamCop from transmitting "complaints it forwards to third parties regarding (OptIn and its subsidiaries, divisions, companies, etc.) to ISPs," according to a court filing.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 10 Talkback(s)
Yeah Im Agreeing With You
'spam law pertains the the senders of an 'email.Can Spam specifies ''email''for a 'sender of an email. It does not detail the relationship (or any kind of relationship) between the sender or receiver ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey Posted on: 05/14/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
AWESOME!  DragonBRockin | 05/13/04
Don't worry  James T. Kirk | 05/13/04
Judge  Dolphin39 | 05/14/04
Empty out all the prisons, too!  Xunil_Sierutuf | 05/13/04
Kind Of Like Reverse Discrmination  ParadigmOdyssey | 05/13/04
Chicken for Dinner  SublimeDaze | 05/14/04
OpIn  beepster | 05/14/04
Yeah Im Agreeing With You  ParadigmOdyssey | 05/14/04
Did you read the judges's reason? AMAZING  j.m.galvin | 05/13/04
I read this is why  Robert Carnegie | 05/14/04

What do you think?

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
Click Here

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here