On mySimon: Dallas Cowboys Sunglasses
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Munir Kotadia
Posted on ZDNet News: Jun 22, 2004 2:56:00 PM

Microsoft has boosted the prospects for some enhancements to Internet Explorer by appointing a new member to its product management team. Some analysts believe the appointment means that the much criticized browser will get a polish before Longhorn is released and IE's importance begins to fade.

Dave Massy, a technical evangelist at Microsoft, worked on the early development of IE but moved to the Longhorn team a few years ago--around the same time the company won the war against Netscape and appeared to lose interest in dramatically changing its browser. On Massy's Web log on Monday he claimed the move "isn't big news" but confirmed he would be working on providing the development team with requests from customers.

"At this stage there isn't much more to add other than to reiterate the point that the Internet Explorer team does exist and does care," Massy said.

"I've really enjoyed working on Longhorn as a technical evangelist and remain very, very excited by the capabilities that Avalon and Longhorn will bring but the time was right for me to return to work on a product team," he said.

In June 2003, Microsoft announced it would not release any new versions of IE as a stand-alone browser. Instead, the software giant said IE would be an integrated part of Longhorn, the company's next major operating system.

However, Longhorn is unlikely to appear for another two or three years, and as many companies are slow to upgrade their operating systems, it may not be in widespread use for up to three years after that.

Microsoft has decided to improve IE because the company wants to protect its virtual monopoly of the browser market, according to Stephen O'Grady, senior analyst at Redmonk.

"Longhorn isn't going to be delivered in the timeframe Microsoft originally expected and users probably can't wait that long for a stabilized browser. So as a stop-gap move, they are going to shore up IE," O'Grady said.

O'Grady said that Longhorn will be designed to "blur the lines" between the Internet and the client, which means the browser will no longer be the primary link between the user and the Net.

"There are a lot of technologies in Longhorn that de-emphasize the importance of the browser," said O'Grady.

Richard Starnes, vice president of security industry group ISSA UK, welcomed Massy's move but said there is unlikely to be any noticeable changes for a long time.

"If he can bring back the same innovative spirit running up to IE 5.5, we can look forward to a good product. But the problem is that it will take about 18 months," Starnes said.

One of IE's competitors in the stand-alone browser sector is Opera, which earlier this year appointed ex-IBM Internet guru John Patrick to its board of directors.

Patrick told ZDNet UK he is not worried about Microsoft improving IE or the arrival of Longhorn, but he hopes any developments will adhere to industry standards.

"Microsoft has clearly neglected the browser for quite a long time. If they are going to pay more attention to the importance of standards, it is good news for everybody," Patrick said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 102 Talkback(s)
i have to hand it to you,
that was clever. (Read the rest)
Posted by: eLurker Posted on: 06/24/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Let me get this straight  Chad_z | 06/22/04
Well, they want to at least pretend the browser is important.  DonnieBoy | 06/22/04
They want to eliminate the browser, they do not want to improve it.  DonnieBoy | 06/22/04
It's a .net world, may as well get used to it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/22/04
.NET like J2EE is SERVER technology  Robert Crocker | 06/22/04
Is .net essential?  IT_User | 06/22/04
Yes and no.  seosamh_z | 06/22/04
Get with the program  Yagotta B. Kidding | 06/22/04
Don't think they won't trick you into proprietary tech on the client.  DonnieBoy | 06/22/04
Yes, that is what MS wants, right now it is a J2EE world.  DonnieBoy | 06/22/04
LOL  CO_TechGuy | 06/23/04
i have to hand it to you,  eLurker | 06/24/04
IE is not a product  rgriffith64@... | 06/22/04
Yes, they slipped up big time!!  DonnieBoy | 06/22/04
it is a part of the OS yes  V Sanders | 06/22/04
Yes, they could make anything part of the OS though.  DonnieBoy | 06/22/04
FireFox 0.9  BitTwiddler | 06/22/04
Hopefully we will get a 1.0 release of FireFox soon.  DonnieBoy | 06/22/04
I Doubt That ...  Mike Rotch | 06/22/04
Yes, being pre-installed is a huge advantage.  DonnieBoy | 06/22/04
I don't see the open standards push ...  Mike Rotch | 06/22/04
Open stds, cheapness...  techboy_z | 06/22/04
That's Awesome!!!  Mike Rotch | 06/22/04
Pre installed isn't that much of an advantage  voska | 06/22/04
To what market segment?  IT_User | 06/22/04
Automatic updates...  Patrick Jones | 06/22/04
Oh, corporations want to spend time patching and updating two browsers????  DonnieBoy | 06/22/04
Most people I know use Mozilla  voska | 06/22/04
Not here - it's Netscape  IT_User | 06/22/04
How much disk space is used?  Spoon Jabber | 06/23/04
FireFox 0.9  LongShipUser | 06/22/04
download manager?  doh123 | 06/22/04
Yep there it is...  LongShipUser | 06/22/04
Slimbrowser instead of IE  jjon2121 | 06/22/04
MS Acknowledges Mozilla  tero_t_vaananen@... | 06/22/04
Firefox S*cks Compaired To The Mozilla Browser  nikoli | 06/22/04
Why is that?  CobraA1 | 06/23/04
Less prefs  nikoli | 06/23/04
close ... you were off by one word  eLurker | 06/23/04
It may be a little faster  Spoon Jabber | 06/23/04
Not holding my breath  Jeff Spicoli | 06/22/04
What you are saying is exactly why Microsoft felt the needed to act.  DonnieBoy | 06/22/04
.001% is going to change the world?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/22/04
Not so clear  IT_User | 06/22/04
From Forbes.com  IT_User | 06/22/04
Rosa Parks did.  Spoon Jabber | 06/23/04
Blur the Lines Between Internet and Clinet?  Mike Rotch | 06/22/04
They do not want you to know when you are using proprietary technology.  DonnieBoy | 06/22/04
So true  IT_User | 06/22/04
Absolutely  seosamh_z | 06/22/04
Easy  Mike Rotch | 06/22/04
I disagree  seosamh_z | 06/22/04
They have tried this before  tero_t_vaananen@... | 06/22/04
There Will Be Two Worlds -- MS is in decline  RobertoSalazar | 06/22/04
Not to be rude ...  Mike Rotch | 06/22/04
About your examples  IT_User | 06/22/04
Save some money..  seosamh_z | 06/22/04
Not my study  IT_User | 06/22/04
My rep gave me the heads up on this weeks ago...  Mike Cox | 06/22/04
10.0  Michael Kelly | 06/22/04
10.0  Loverock Davidson | 06/22/04
Give it up - you're not funny anymore.  JustMe99_z | 06/22/04
LOL...  LongShipUser | 06/22/04
9 for content 6 for delivery...  ryusen | 06/22/04
Very Clever  P. Douglas | 06/22/04
Sorry. I meant to point out ...  P. Douglas | 06/22/04
Chocolate cake ... wink My favorite! Ah, Mike...  Grayson_Peddie | 06/22/04
Smart move I would say.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/22/04
Or vice-versa  IT_User | 06/22/04
networking has been part of the OS since the mid 80's.  B.O.F.H. | 06/22/04
So? I mean who cares? What is your point?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/22/04
Please explain  Patrick Jones | 06/22/04
Certainly...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/22/04
still does nto exlplain...  ryusen | 06/22/04
I don't NEED it to be a browser.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/22/04
i'm trying to understand why yoru tangent matters to the article?  ryusen | 06/22/04
I think you are missing what I am saying.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/22/04
i disagree  ryusen | 06/23/04
Nor do you need it NOT to be a browser  IT_User | 06/22/04
You miss the entire point  Robert Crocker | 06/22/04
Because I don't want a browser....  quietLee | 06/22/04
Then how do you find...  Robert Crocker | 06/22/04
Simple, Microsoft (MSN) does search.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/22/04
a rose by any other name...  ryusen | 06/22/04
Can you say .net and ASP?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/22/04
Can you USE .net and ASP?  IT_User | 06/22/04
2nd choice of top level domain and Application Service Provider?  B.O.F.H. | 06/22/04
Huh???  LongShipUser | 06/22/04
Why do you care?  IT_User | 06/22/04
Greetings, IT_User  FederalistPaperBoy | 06/22/04
Sort of back burner  IT_User | 06/23/04
Huh???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/22/04
And that's no different from the way things are now  Michael Kelly | 06/22/04
the other problem...  ryusen | 06/22/04
Its not an Evangelist they need  enternamehere-20061413043042855708329691381958 | 06/22/04
Design issues, integration  techboy_z | 06/22/04
The problem with your point  IT_User | 06/22/04
Please Don't Use This Worm & Virus Spreader  claytonmuhler | 06/22/04
Oh @#$%&*!  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 06/22/04
Somebody please tell me why I "need" this  CobraA1 | 06/23/04
.net does beat out j2ee NOW  ITsucks | 06/23/04
You'll excuse me if I don't simply take MS's word for it...  Michael Kelly | 06/23/04

What do you think?

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here