On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ina Fried
Posted on ZDNet News: Jul 27, 2004 10:52:00 PM

Microsoft said Tuesday that it has delayed an update to its Windows Server software as well as the first version of Windows to support 64-bit x86 chips such as Advanced Micro Device's Athlon 64.

The software maker said Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1, Windows Server 2003 for 64-bit Extended Systems and Windows XP 64-bit Edition for 64-bit Extended Systems will all be pushed back until the first half of next year. All three products, which are being developed together, were slated to ship by the end of this year.

The move is a blow to AMD, which has had its 64-bit desktop and server chips on the market for some time and has been waiting for a version of Windows that can take advantage of their capabilities. Intel has also said it will have chips that support the 64-bit extensions to the existing Pentium architecture, known as x86. There is already a version of Windows that supports Intel's 64-bit Itanium architecture, which uses an entirely separate instruction set than x86 chips.

"As is the case with all Microsoft product schedules, the development cycle is driven by quality with a focus on the needs of our customers, rather than an arbitrary date," Microsoft said in a statement.

Insight 64 analyst Nathan Brookwood said that although AMD would benefit from the software's release, the delay should not significantly hurt the ability of AMD's Opteron chip to compete against Intel's Xeon.

"They run very well in 32-bit mode. They are very competitive with Intel's Xeon in 32-bit mode," Brookwood said. The delay could inadvertently give Linux a leg up, Brookwood added, noting that 64-bit versions of that operating system are available that support both IBM's DB2 and Oracle's database software. "People who are motivated by database (performance) may find those environments preferable."

Similarly on the desktop, Brookwood said the delay could push some of those that need the performance gain of 64-bit computing over to Linux. "Again, a lot of the early workstation applications are in technical markets, CAD (computer-aided design) and the like. There Linux, again, is gaining some popularity."

Microsoft's announcement marks the latest in a series of delays for the 64-bit version of Windows XP.

AMD announced its first 64-bit chips in September 2003, at which time Microsoft had planned to release, by the first half of this year, a version of Windows that would support the chips.

Microsoft has also had to push back other versions of Windows. The long-awaited security update to Windows XP--Service Pack 2--has taken longer than expected and is now set to ship in August. Microsoft has also said the next major release of Windows, code-named Longhorn, won't ship until 2006.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 54 Talkback(s)
64-bit software
http://www.analogstereo.com/kia_sedona_owners_manual.htm... (Read the rest)
Posted by: yu_forum@... Posted on: 05/25/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Everybody calm down...  Mike Cox | 07/27/04
..Linux x86_64 has been available since last year..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 07/27/04
Small correction  michael-t | 07/27/04
I meant AMD64, but thanks for correction(NT)  Xunil_Sierutuf | 07/28/04
Yawn!  AbsolutelyNot | 07/27/04
Are you implying W2K3 needs Itanium to run print/file servers?  Plain Logic | 07/27/04
Implied Itanium requirement -- was that 32 or 64 bits you have now???  clasher_z | 07/29/04
Snork!  Cardinal_Bill | 07/27/04
deploy 64 bit  yu_forum@... | 05/25/07
6.2 Mike you've done better  Squawkbox | 07/27/04
Itanium  georgep_z | 07/28/04
You are delaying too?  clasher_z | 07/28/04
Come again!?!?!  chiwawa | 07/27/04
Even if you go easy on them.  doe_z | 07/27/04
Love ZDNet's "related links"...  Fred Fredrickson | 07/27/04
Ain't it intersting  Squawkbox | 07/28/04
Proof positive...  bjbrock | 07/27/04
MS wouldn't know QUALITY if it hit them between the eyes !  realitycheck101 | 07/27/04
Of course, you know absolutely nothing about software development  marksashton | 07/28/04
Agreed  PA-ITGuy | 07/28/04
64-bit drivers...  prime21 | 07/28/04
either way...  ryusen | 07/28/04
64-bit software  yu_forum@... | 05/25/07
64-bit software  yu_forum@... | 05/25/07
While you are waiting for Wintel 64bit.  alterego_z | 07/27/04
REPENT, You Apple loving heathen.......  middle of nowhere | 07/27/04
correction for you  doh123 | 07/28/04
The chickens are coming home to roost  Sunny Jalolly | 07/27/04
Are you sure Mac OS X 10.3 is 64-bit?  dvm | 07/27/04
10.3 Not 64 Bit  MonsterPuppy | 07/28/04
well...  doh123 | 07/28/04
MUCH better than Panther  yu_forum@... | 05/25/07
Intel owes them one  TerryC_z | 07/28/04
New light...Intel & SCO?  techboy_z | 07/28/04
Isn't this a blow to Intel too?  Robert Crocker | 07/28/04
abandoning the Itanium route???  PA-ITGuy | 07/28/04
Then again  johnnyu | 07/28/04
How old is the IA-64 and don't forget VME/VSB  clasher_z | 07/28/04
IA-64 == Alpha, VME == Hypertransport, ??? WTF  TerryC_z | 07/29/04
Hey... we're both on the AMD side  clasher_z | 07/29/04
agree with you  yu_forum@... | 05/25/07
IA-64 == Alpha, VME == Hypertransport, ??? WTF  TerryC_z | 07/29/04
Itanium  clasher_z | 07/29/04
Correction / addendum  clasher_z | 07/29/04
Credit where credit is due  TerryC_z | 07/30/04
Since most posters here won't use it anyway  FilledOut | 07/28/04
there are a few  php_developer | 07/28/04
No biggie...  BitTwiddler | 07/28/04
Trustworthy computing?  d_jedi | 07/28/04
Win XP/2003 64 delay -- wonder why  clasher_z | 07/28/04
calm down?  lotta_anger | 07/29/04
What comes after XP from M$ --- Round 2 anyone?  clasher_z | 07/29/04
addendum  clasher_z | 07/29/04
you can't beat them  yu_forum@... | 05/25/07

What do you think?

SmartPlanet

Click Here