On mySimon: Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ina Fried
Posted on ZDNet News: Jul 30, 2004 7:14:00 PM

Although server customers may have to wait a little longer for a version of Windows that supports their 64-bit systems, they won't have to pay for an upgrade when the software does ship.

Microsoft said Friday that customers that buy a 64-bit Opteron or Xeon server and pay for a license to Windows Server 2003 will be able to exchange that license for one that covers the 64-bit edition when it ships next year. Earlier this week, Microsoft announced it was pushing out the launch of that product until next year, the latest in a series of delays for the 64-bit edition.

So-called x64 chips--64-bit processors that build on the existing x86 instruction set--have been on the market since April 2003, when AMD introduced its first Opteron. Some analysts had expected that Microsoft would have a 64-bit version of Windows out by the end of 2003, and the company itself first promised the software would make its debut in the first part of this year. It pushed that date back to the end of this year before the latest delay.

Part of the reason for the timing is that Microsoft has tied the release of both the desktop and server versions of 64-bit Windows to the release of Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1, which has itself been pushed back.

The software maker said the "technology exchange program" will allow customers to feel secure in buying x64 servers today, pointing out that such servers can offer a 10 percent to 30 percent performance enhancement running existing 32-bit software.

"We see (that) the x64 architecture is, over time, going to become the dominant platform for the server market," said Dennis Oldroyd, a director in Microsoft's Windows Server unit. Oldroyd said the technology-exchange program announced Friday was only for the server OS.

Oldroyd also said Microsoft plans to make an updated beta version of the software available Monday. The latest test version, part of its , supports both AMD's Opteron as well as Intel's 64-bit Xeon architecture. Earlier test versions supported only AMD chips.

Oldroyd said he doesn't think Microsoft is holding up adoption of 64-bit technology.

"Given where customers are in the evaluation phase, we don't think we're holding back that adoption," he said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 42 Talkback(s)
In your mind only...
. (Read the rest)
Posted by: Linux User 147560 Posted on: 08/01/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
MS helping Intel to catch up  dg mh | 07/30/04
more like...  Iain_Peters | 07/30/04
No Formal development schedule for Linux !  mbraincell@... | 07/30/04
No Formal development schedule for Linux !  Loverock Davidson | 07/30/04
What is LINSUX ?  mbraincell@... | 07/30/04
What is LINSUX ?  Loverock Davidson | 07/30/04
Obviously you don't either  Jay Cash | 07/30/04
Right  Loverock Davidson | 07/30/04
Don't make fun of dyslexic (sp?) people..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 07/30/04
And who is LovesCock?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/30/04
Oh soooo original...  Loverock Davidson | 07/30/04
Just like you, LovesCock.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/31/04
Enterprise ANALyst...  Linux User 147560 | 08/01/04
Lin is his  Linux User 147560 | 08/01/04
Linsuxs and M$  Bill4 | 07/30/04
Bias?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/30/04
Bias?  Loverock Davidson | 07/30/04
In your mind only...  Linux User 147560 | 08/01/04
In the words of the immortal J. Wellington Wimpy  Cardinal_Bill | 07/30/04
I think your off a bit.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/30/04
My ISP has been bouncing  Cardinal_Bill | 07/30/04
Unreal value and savings...  Mike Cox | 07/30/04
Not bad Mike  shallow_diver | 07/30/04
Supercomputer for Norton updates !  mbraincell@... | 07/30/04
Perhaps you didn't hear, Mikey.  bjbrock | 07/30/04
Mikey you are such a fraud!  drichards1953 | 07/30/04
Hey, he has the most entertaining posts here!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/30/04
I have my hands on the NEWEST beta  toomuchgreeatea@... | 07/31/04
Regardless of the reason, this was a mistake.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/30/04
What have you done with Bitty?  Xunil_Sierutuf | 07/30/04
I take MS to task when appropiate.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/30/04
So, are you saying...  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/30/04
Nothing of the sort.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/31/04
But what about those people who WANT legacy support?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/31/04
They have one.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/31/04
Unforgivable  toomuchgreeatea@... | 07/30/04
Not necessarily.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/31/04
You don't understand the problems.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/31/04
Maybe others can't, but MS should know  toomuchgreeatea@... | 07/31/04
One more time, it's NOT their code!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/01/04
Gee ... EMULATE!!  toomuchgreeatea@... | 08/01/04
The Best Solution for an Upgrade!  TechRoot.com | 07/30/04

What do you think?

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads