On MovieTome: TRANSFORMERS 2 has THE TOUCH!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Abby Dinham
Posted on ZDNet News: Aug 20, 2004 7:56:00 PM

Sharman Networks, Australian parent company of the file-sharing software developer Kazaa, is rejoicing at the U.S. court ruling that two similar peer-to-peer programs, Grokster and Morpheus, do not violate copyright law.

However, the company concedes that the ruling is unlikely to have any effect on a music copyright-infringement case currently going through the courts in Australia.


News.blog
Broadband
Our reporters' take on what's
happening in broadband.


Sharman said that, as consequence of the decision made by the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, it will file a motion for a similar ruling to be held over its U.S. copyright infringement case, with the group's lead counsel for the trial, Rod Dorman, demonstrating a new air of confidence.

"Sharman Networks will be filing a motion for summary judgment nearly identical to the successful motions filed by Grokster and Morpheus, and we are confident that Judge Wilson will find that our product, Kazaa, is a lawful product as well," he said.

Dorman describes the decision as a victory for the technology industry and for fans, artists and owners of entertainment content.

"Entertainment industry executives in the U.S. must now embrace peer-to-peer technology and work with software developers and other partners to commercialize it. It is time for them to take their business back from their lawyers and steer it into the future of digital distribution," Dorman said.

However, Dorman added that the decision will not set a precedent for a case underway in Australia, in which Sharman Networks is facing music copyright infringement charges related to its Kazaa software. The action was brought by Universal Music Australia and numerous Australian record companies. After six months of hearings, the case is still in the early stages of evidential discovery.

"The doctrines of vicarious and contributory copyright infringement have been established in the U.S. by the courts," Dorman said. "Although analogous doctrines are recognized by Australian courts, the principles to be applied are not identical."

Yet Dorman adds he expects the Australian court will consider the U.S. appeals court's line of thought and decision in its deliberations.

"Regardless, the reasoning of the Ninth Circuit decision is powerful, sound and persuasive. In addition, and more importantly, we are a global community, and there should be consistent doctrines governing the application of copyright law to the Internet worldwide," he said.

The public face of Sharman Networks, CEO Nikki Hemming, describes the decision as a "fantastic result" for the peer-to-peer community, which she said reinforces similar decisions in other courts around the world that peer-to-peer software is legal.

"Our message to the entertainment industry is to stop litigating and start partnering with us. Legislation is not the answer, commercialization of P2P is," she said.

Sharman Networks was back in Australian court last Wednesday to continue negotiations over evidence access and procedural matters. No firm court date has been set; however, presiding Justice Murray Wilcox has set a tentative trial date of Nov. 29.

Abby Dinham of ZDNet Australia reported from Sydney.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 31 Talkback(s)
fair use goes beyond that...
for example, it's within fair use for me to make a copy of my CD and give it to my sister, my friend, my GF... or make a mixed CD and give it away. as long as i stay within the limits of the NET Act ($1000/6mo).... (Read the rest)
Posted by: ryusen Posted on: 08/23/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
tools should never be blamed for the crime  V Sanders | 08/20/04
P2P , not server!  nomorems | 08/20/04
Whoa a second there  voska | 08/20/04
no no no  V Sanders | 08/21/04
Uploading vs. Copying  TechDiva_z | 08/23/04
fair use goes beyond that...  ryusen | 08/23/04
No, don't congratulate yourselves on it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/20/04
Last time I checked..  d_jedi | 08/20/04
Wink, wink, don't do that...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/21/04
can't have it both ways  V Sanders | 08/21/04
Given what teh users do, I say they disregard the EULA  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/22/04
And that's the P2P company's problem.. why?  d_jedi | 08/23/04
wink, wink?  d_jedi | 08/23/04
Why not?  TechDiva_z | 08/23/04
Why not  d_jedi | 08/23/04
And you are supporting an illegally maintained monopoly...  Xunil_Sierutuf | 08/23/04
question for you guys  Valis Keogh | 08/20/04
You buy a copy  amicus_curious | 08/21/04
What about the 1960's?  Bill_gates_Is_SATAN | 08/22/04
EULA?  voska | 08/23/04
Check the online stores?  d_jedi | 08/23/04
You own it all  voska | 08/23/04
You miss the point  bugmenot00 | 08/21/04
The man in the middle  amicus_curious | 08/21/04
Really???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/21/04
Kind of a stupid assumption  amicus_curious | 08/21/04
Sorry, stealing is not buying.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/22/04
Stealing in this case is legal  voska | 08/23/04
Interesting how you take an arguement out of context!  B.O.F.H. | 08/22/04
Ok, now that was stupid  voska | 08/23/04
Pirates?  TechDiva_z | 08/23/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and
advertisement
Click Here