On The Insider: Joe Simpson to Produce TV Show
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ina Fried
Posted on ZDNet News: Sep 9, 2004 12:50:00 AM

SAN FRANCISCO--Microsoft continues to make adjustments to a controversial architecture for securing PCs but still plans to include the feature in Longhorn, the next release of Windows.

The software maker stressed that Longhorn will work regardless of whether the Next Generation Secure Computing Base (NGSCB) is enabled. That technology is designed to make PCs more secure by shifting sensitive data and operations into a separate part of the computer's operation. The software maker also continues an overhaul of the technology, which is already quite different from the code that was given out to developers at Microsoft's Professional Developer Conference last year.

"We're making some modifications based on feedback from the industry," said Steve Heil, Windows technical evangelist, on Wednesday during a presentation at the Intel Developer Forum here.

The revamped NGSCB will still allow companies that use it to separate things like keystrokes and user logins into a separate "compartment" within Windows, a move that should make such information harder for hackers to access. One of the big changes is that these compartments are based on Windows programming interfaces as compared with the custom code that was required in the version given out at the Professional Developer Conference.

The technology will continue to let companies also run custom programs, or "scenarios," within a secure layer, although that appears to be less of a focus than when Microsoft first demonstrated the software last year. At the time there was concern that Microsoft was trying to lock in Windows customers and that it could lock users out of their data.

Heil said potential customers were concerned that the security benefits of the earlier approach were outweighed by the pain involved in changing their internal applications.

Microsoft has been trying to create these kinds of changes to Windows for more than half a decade, since developers and researchers at the company first outlined the ideas of a "Trusted Windows." The initiative took on the code name Palladium in 2002, and, Heil said, raised the ire of those who saw it as the equivalent of digital rights management on a chip.

The latest changes have been in the works for a while, with the shift first evident at the WinHec conference this spring in Seattle.

Despite the changes, Microsoft still plans for some version of the technology to be included in Longhorn, which is due for desktops and notebooks in 2006 and for servers in 2007.

"We're on track to have...at least some of those features in the Longhorn release," Heil said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 184 Talkback(s)
This is why I started using Linux
Three years ago, I read something about Palldium, and now, I'm running all Linux all the time.

So maybe this is a good thing; maybe it's a bad thing. All I need to know is that I have a choi... (Read the rest)
Posted by: blackbelt_jones Posted on: 04/27/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Microsoft needs  ParadigmOdyssey | 09/08/04
Chief, we gotta put SOMETHING in shorthorn!  chiwawa | 09/08/04
Worse! With restrictions!  Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/09/04
Owners have ZERO restrictions.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
it means I won't buy into it  V Sanders | 09/09/04
I agree, labling is important.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Why? Windows is a Toy Operating System  brenthawkinsmd | 09/09/04
You have trouble clicking?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
I was thinking ame thing  V Sanders | 09/09/04
It's irritating  voska | 09/09/04
Well the decision is made - - -  sometime | 09/09/04
No matter the name, customsters stay away from DRM...  Root User | 09/08/04
Yea, what he said! And "the link"  Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/09/04
thanks!!  cybershoplifter | 09/09/04
Not a chance, not even a remote chance...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
if customers had a CHOICE  V Sanders | 09/09/04
And if wishes were fishes...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
you are wrong  V Sanders | 09/09/04
always that same assumption...  ryusen | 09/09/04
Here it is....  richdave | 10/03/04
no kidding  V Sanders | 09/09/04
"Feedback from industry" must be RIAA,MPAA  Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/09/04
And every company with sensitive content.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
yes, companies want their pc's calling ms  V Sanders | 09/09/04
More black helicopters?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
you don't think....  ryusen | 09/09/04
The phone-home thing.  cbiltcliffe@... | 09/10/04
nonsense  NemesisNL | 09/09/04
And the governments around the world.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
the true reason the DOJ let ms off  V Sanders | 09/09/04
Ummm, seen any little green men lately?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
No  php_developer | 09/09/04
Do me a favor then, don't read them.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
would make it easier to spread you FUD wouldn't it(NT)  V Sanders | 09/09/04
Pretty Thin Agenda No Ax  ParadigmOdyssey | 09/09/04
and you think...  ryusen | 09/09/04
yeah  NemesisNL | 09/09/04
DRM can be good or bad depending on how it's implemented  Michael Kelly | 09/09/04
why not give customers the CHOICE  V Sanders | 09/09/04
You are dead wrong.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
you are right  V Sanders | 09/09/04
You are dead wrong...  nomorems | 09/10/04
Well, I bet MS wishes it could...  Zogg | 09/12/04
You do have choice  Michael Kelly | 09/09/04
not true  V Sanders | 09/09/04
Are you saying...  Michael Kelly | 09/09/04
Try again.  bhanes@... | 09/09/04
How so?  Michael Kelly | 09/09/04
Copying *nix  Roger Ramjet | 09/09/04
OUTSTANDING!!! Simply outstanding!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
the OWNER  V Sanders | 09/09/04
That would depend on how it was sold...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Copyright abuse  Yagotta B. Kidding | 09/09/04
Yes, far too many abuse copyright law.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
so punish paying customers with DRM  V Sanders | 09/09/04
I don;t care if RIAA increases sales or not.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
your right no ax, you just want ms to control the world  V Sanders | 09/09/04
Bad Laws  tic swayback | 09/09/04
And that is where you are wrong, dead wrong!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
What would you have us do?  tic swayback | 09/09/04
no ax - in your part of the world the rich are not punished  V Sanders | 09/09/04
Your speed law explanation works against you  voska | 09/09/04
Bad Laws cont'd  tic swayback | 09/09/04
Let me put it another way so you can understand.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Fuzzy logic  tic swayback | 09/09/04
I agree to one point.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Do you use a VCR?  tic swayback | 09/09/04
No, I don't.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
To No_Ax: Why Fair Use exists  Joel R | 09/09/04
Wow, you've never Xeroxed anything out of a book?  tic swayback | 09/09/04
and let me turn that around...  ryusen | 09/09/04
Respond to the actual message, No_Ax.  Joel R | 09/09/04
Thanks for pointing out the strawman  Yagotta B. Kidding | 09/09/04
Sorry, I'm kinda new to ZD TalkBack.  Joel R | 09/09/04
Need to use square brackets [ ] rather than...  MacCanuck | 09/09/04
Unreadable post. Forget the HTML, ok?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Speed laws a good analogy  Anton Philidor | 09/09/04
Speed??  voska | 09/09/04
Respond to the actual message, No_Ax (v.2)  Joel R | 09/09/04
denouncing the theives...  ryusen | 09/09/04
That is the question, isn't it?  Michael Kelly | 09/09/04
Says who?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
You're taking me way too literally  Michael Kelly | 09/09/04
No, your wrong.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Mine can  voska | 09/09/04
Ok here:  Michael Kelly | 09/09/04
You are white noise...  nomorems | 09/10/04
Good point  voska | 09/10/04
was it on the label"  V Sanders | 09/09/04
Not required.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Wrong  tic swayback | 09/09/04
Most are NOT labled as a CD. You assume it is.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Consider yourself A** then, you are still wrong  tic swayback | 09/09/04
tic, are your arms tired yet.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Not even breathing heavy  tic swayback | 09/09/04
Does this mean we'll be signing contracts?  tic swayback | 09/09/04
tic, you assume I care what you do...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Just asking you to clarify your point?  tic swayback | 09/09/04
Call it buyer bewware.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Lemon laws  tic swayback | 09/09/04
tic, let me explain it one more time.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
But they can't break the law or their contracts to do it  tic swayback | 09/09/04
No_Ax is White Noise...  nomorems | 09/10/04
That's why I don't buy online music  voska | 09/09/04
No additional restriction can be applied for a purchase  voska | 09/09/04
Ummm, dude  php_developer | 09/09/04
Owner versus rightsholder  tic swayback | 09/09/04
Doesn't matter, DRM is here and there is nothing you can do about it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Just shut up and go along with the fascists?  tic swayback | 09/09/04
That is the MS way...  nomorems | 09/10/04
If I BUY it then it is up to ME on how I use it legally  BitTwiddler | 09/09/04
how wrong you are...  ryusen | 09/09/04
That's exactly where it is now,  NemesisNL | 09/09/04
Dull Ax, Dull Ax, Dull Ax. Again, so wrong....  richdave | 10/03/04
How about the consumer?  CobraA1 | 09/09/04
It IS for the consumer.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
spyware no-ax - it's spyware  V Sanders | 09/09/04
Then YOUR choice is to not buy it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
ms will let OEMs give us this choice - LOL  V Sanders | 09/09/04
Every major OEM sells Linux boxes.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
NAME ONE  V Sanders | 09/09/04
To V Sanders: HP does  Michael Kelly | 09/09/04
How about, HP, DELL, IBM, Gateway to name a few.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Uh, OEM's don't sell content.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
are you saying ms has no content - lol  V Sanders | 09/09/04
Not entirely true  voska | 09/09/04
Look at this....Dull Ax.  richdave | 10/03/04
Boy, you really DON'T get it do you...  BitTwiddler | 09/09/04
How does it get better?  NemesisNL | 09/09/04
Huge hole to remain for 2 years  Teknophobic | 09/09/04
MS Can Seperate These Things But NOT IE From the OS???  brenthawkinsmd | 09/09/04
What ever gave yu such a silly idea?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Microsoft said that in court.  B.O.F.H. | 09/09/04
Sorry, you are wrong and need help.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
ms doubletalk  V Sanders | 09/09/04
The fact you can't understand is not my fault.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Not double talk  voska | 09/09/04
find the citation!  B.O.F.H. | 09/09/04
You made the claim, you back it up.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
that means no ax knows he is wrong  V Sanders | 09/09/04
Wasn't my claim, back up your statement.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Based upon your comment...  B.O.F.H. | 09/09/04
Read the thread, who made the statement??  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
And Judge (hangem) Jackson said.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
that is not what they said in court  V Sanders | 09/09/04
That is exactlly what they said.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
here are two links  NemesisNL | 09/09/04
Will this work??  richdave | 10/03/04
Users don't care  voska | 09/09/04
the majority of users aren't even aware to make the choice...  ryusen | 09/09/04
If only we knew what we were talking about.  Anton Philidor | 09/09/04
Alas, on the issue of DRM, No_Ax is largely correct.  B.O.F.H. | 09/09/04
And we now know  Confused by religion | 09/09/04
What can I say, the industry pays well!  B.O.F.H. | 09/09/04
You seem to know a lot about it...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Much of this is ancient history....  B.O.F.H. | 09/09/04
Just ask Gutenberg  tic swayback | 09/09/04
Why is it BOFH knows so much about ......  BXLE | 09/09/04
Who broght up Linux?  B.O.F.H. | 09/09/04
that's fine and dandy IF...  ryusen | 09/09/04
No big deal, Apple is the future  FilledOut | 09/09/04
Clue for you, Apple (IBM CPU) has DRM.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
You made the claim, you back it up  tic swayback | 09/09/04
Not all Intel CPUs will have DRM  scrapheap | 09/09/04
Old and out of date article. Sorrry, your wrong.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
So show us your source...  scrapheap | 09/09/04
Yeah, let's see it!  tic swayback | 09/09/04
To no ax...  Michael Kelly | 09/09/04
Sorry that was supposed to be a reply to no ax's comment  Michael Kelly | 09/09/04
Is that true?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Exactly my point  Michael Kelly | 09/09/04
And we know what "assume" does...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
WRONG. Try again.  Michael Kelly | 09/09/04
Actually, they are labeled incorrectly  tic swayback | 09/09/04
Sorry, but that's your mistake.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Actually, somethnig like that happened to my uncle.  Michael Kelly | 09/09/04
How many times can you be so wrong?  tic swayback | 09/09/04
Again, Dull Ax......sigh.  richdave | 10/03/04
lock down the user instead lowering the price.. *sigh*  M_c | 09/09/04
Microsoft security?  stromberge | 09/10/04
Longhorn ain't done  Sunny Jalolly | 09/10/04
WINDOWS SECURITY NOT GOOD ENUGH  MASTERPICE | 09/11/04
Did we miss our meds?  Linux User 147560 | 09/11/04
This is why I started using Linux  blackbelt_jones | 04/27/05

What do you think?

SmartPlanet

Click Here