On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Matt Hines
Posted on ZDNet News: Sep 13, 2004 3:47:00 PM

A number of software makers and well-known IT vendors have agreed to endorse the Free Standards Group's latest Linux standard to help create common ground for companies building open-source technologies.

The San Francisco-based nonprofit said Monday that open-source software makers around the world have already adopted the guideline, known as Linux Standard Base 2.0. In addition, the Free Standards Group said a handful of high-profile vendors already working with Linux technology are backing the standard, including Advanced Micro Devices, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, IBM and Intel.

"As with any standard you must reach a certain critical mass to gain recognition," said Jim Zemlin, executive director of the Free Standards Group. "We've gained total support from the world's Linux software makers and having these other vendors come lend their support goes a long way."

Linux Standard Base 2.0 was first released to the public in January, but the Free Standards Group officially launched a final version of the guideline on Monday.

The trade group's goal with Linux Standard Base 2.0 is to create a central point of reference for programmers and companies working on open-source technologies. While Linux was created primarily by individuals adding their own touches to the free operating system launched by Linus Torvalds in 1991, over the years it has been funneled into a number of different versions, specifically by companies looking to reap profits from their own iterations of the software, including Red Hat and Novell.

If the Free Standards Group can make Linux Standard Base 2.0 the de facto guideline for companies working with the open-source operating system, the effort could help vendors compete more closely with Microsoft, whose Windows operating system dominates the market. In the past, Microsoft has used the existence of many variations of Linux as a marketing tool for Windows, implying that the variety of software versions equates to potential instability and unpredictability in working with the open-source software.

Zemlin asserts that Microsoft has been overstating the idea that Linux is unstable, in an attempt to instill a "fear of fragmentation" about open-source products across the IT industry. However, he said that the software giant's current policy of using Window's total cost of ownership to market against Linux speaks volumes.

"Customers are smart enough to understand that efforts like Linux Standard Base are reducing the need to worry about stability, and now Microsoft is pointing at the cost of supporting Linux as an advantage," he said. "If price is their best bet to fight Linux, I think open source is winning the battle already."

From Dell's perspective, lending support to Linux Standard Base 2.0 will help prevent a scenario similar to the splintering of the Unix software market, when various companies built their own incompatible versions of the operating system and created long-term headaches for customers and developers alike.

"If you look at the days of Unix fragmentation, you can see why we hope that wouldn't occur again," said Judy Chavis, director of business development at Dell Product Group. "The key for Dell is that with the Linux Standard Base binary code, we won't be forced to rewrite our software every time there is a new Linux distribution."

For example, Chavis said that Dell is working to make its business management software compliant with the standard. While the Round Rock, Texas-based company does not produce a great deal of software, Chavis said Dell remains tightly focused on promoting efforts that will simplify interoperability among different technologies.

At its core, Linux Standard Base 2.0 is meant to standardize how some aspects of Linux work, with the goal of making it easier for software makers to create programs that run on different companies' versions of the open-source operating system. Software developers already working on Linux Standard Base-certified products include Red Hat, SuSE Linux, MandrakeSoft, Conectiva, ThizLinux Laboratory, Sun Wah Linux, Turbolinux and Progeny.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 96 Talkback(s)
Here we go again
Back in the mid to late 80s several of the big unix vendors (IBM, DEC, HP, SUN, ...) got behind an OSF initiative to come up with a "Standard" unix. All paid lip service to it but only DEC implemente... (Read the rest)
Posted by: XXX_z Posted on: 09/22/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Linux needs this  agramont@... | 09/13/04
Ironic  rapson | 09/13/04
well, the REAL ideal would be...  ryusen | 09/13/04
Bring back the commentary!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
Don't click on the blogs  voska | 09/13/04
Good idea.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
Agreed  Mr_Shifty | 09/13/04
Belch the blogs  Roger Ramjet | 09/14/04
How does this help differenciate products?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
Do you mean that ...  Eggs Ackley_z | 09/13/04
Exactlly! A race to the bottom!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
There will be others who will try to differentiate  Michael Kelly | 09/13/04
Will it matter?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
Yeah, but what if you can have both?  Michael Kelly | 09/13/04
And of them, cost is the one that counts.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
And as I'm sure you know well...  Michael Kelly | 09/13/04
How so when they all sell/provide the same thing?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
Exactly the same?  Michael Kelly | 09/13/04
That makes them identical.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
There IS a difference...  Michael Kelly | 09/13/04
Love/Hate the CEO, He is still the boss.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
Eye Candy is what Microsoft does best  voska | 09/13/04
Desktop vs. server.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
You could be right  voska | 09/14/04
Eye candy?  seosamh_z | 09/13/04
compared to DOS (NT)  doh123 | 09/13/04
The GUI and Wizards  voska | 09/14/04
follwoing a standard doesn't mean being a clone...  ryusen | 09/13/04
Not according to the story.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
No  Michael Kelly | 09/13/04
Huh, what desktop?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
So what you are saying ...  P. Douglas | 09/13/04
But...  Michael Kelly | 09/13/04
do you understand what compliant is?  ryusen | 09/13/04
You make my point for me.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
you are so wrong...  ryusen | 09/13/04
Yes you are.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
Now wait a minute...  Michael Kelly | 09/13/04
or how about....  ryusen | 09/13/04
Pentium 4 vs Athlon XP is like Pepsi vs Coke  voska | 09/14/04
It's Not Going To Work  P. Douglas | 09/13/04
Spot On!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
How is that any different from right now?  voska | 09/13/04
Yes and no.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
And that low cost distro could very well offshore ...  P. Douglas | 09/13/04
Reply to P Douglas  voska | 09/14/04
and i stand in amazement, that...  ryusen | 09/13/04
Proof is in the pudding.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
let's see:  ryusen | 09/13/04
You sure can and businesses do  voska | 09/13/04
No You Can't  P. Douglas | 09/13/04
You illustrate my point perfectly  voska | 09/14/04
there will still be ways to differentiate...  ryusen | 09/13/04
Not really...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
Once again...  Michael Kelly | 09/13/04
Exactlly right!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/14/04
Do you even understand what a baseline is?  B.O.F.H. | 09/13/04
Do you have a clue how markets work?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/14/04
like the m4 bolt, like auto-gas... oh those are standards that haven't been  hipparchus2000 | 09/14/04
You do realize  rapson | 09/13/04
Now you've gone and done it!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
God forbid...  Michael Kelly | 09/13/04
Nothing wrong with it  rapson | 09/14/04
there's a difference between  ryusen | 09/13/04
Efficiency?  rapson | 09/14/04
it depends....  ryusen | 09/14/04
The LSB is a baseline, nothing more!  B.O.F.H. | 09/13/04
Yup, the cheapest *** on the block wins.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
We have the same in hardware, though.  B.O.F.H. | 09/13/04
repeating the same rubbish over and over doesn't make it true  hipparchus2000 | 09/14/04
Don't have to standardize everything  John L. Ries | 09/13/04
no need, you can make your own linux distro WITHOUT LSB. Freedom  hipparchus2000 | 09/14/04
Linux in management software... alread been there...  +-Chris-+ | 09/13/04
Who Cares About Yesterday's News : Microsoft  brenthawkinsmd | 09/13/04
Man, how wrong can you possibly be???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/13/04
I've worked on a bunch of Windows software  hipparchus2000 | 09/14/04
Not much experience in the real world?  balsover | 09/13/04
That's the service you BUY when you BUY SUSE OR LINSPIRE X.X  hipparchus2000 | 09/14/04
Money-Hungry Monopoly ...  mwagner@... | 09/14/04
Would be nice to know the details...  John L. Ries | 09/13/04
RE: Love/Hate the CEO, He is still the boss.  Michael Kelly | 09/13/04
Great news for Linux ... uniformity + choice  George Mitchell | 09/13/04
Dream on ...  mwagner@... | 09/14/04
Spot on Post!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/14/04
Why not?  voska | 09/14/04
Promise of C, etc  hipparchus2000 | 09/14/04
Software Industry will die first  voska | 09/14/04
tinfoil hat wearer  hipparchus2000 | 09/14/04
Finally they get it.  jimk_z | 09/13/04
You mean eye candy (GUI that actually works)  jimk_z | 09/13/04
eaten into market  hipparchus2000 | 09/14/04
Window 2000 and later are very command line friendly  voska | 09/14/04
Linux standard gains big-name backers  Loverock Davidson | 09/14/04
Standards are fine but ...  mwagner@... | 09/14/04
I've taken a C tool and compiled it on many UNIX systems  hipparchus2000 | 09/14/04
Here we go again  XXX_z | 09/22/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here