On CBS MoneyWatch: The Dumbest Generation: Who Is It?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Graeme Wearden
Posted on ZDNet News: Oct 29, 2004 3:57:00 PM

With the European Parliament poised to begin deliberating on software patents again, organizations on both sides of the argument are continuing to push their cases.

EICTA, the European Information and Communication Technology Association, wrote to the parliament's legal committee this week, calling for the introduction of software patents. EICTA argued that patents would protect the investments made by European companies in research and development, protect jobs and encourage the sharing of information among companies.

"Europe is a prominent player in software-enabled inventions in many areas, such as health care, telecommunications, mobile phones, cars, aviation and consumer electronics. Europe needs patents to maintain and strengthen its leadership," wrote EICTA.

However, EICTA's position is being challenged by some who oppose the introduction of software patents, such as the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII).

"The EICTA is repeating the same dubious and inaccurate claims that have been heard for so long," said Rufus Pollock, U.K. spokesman for the foundation.

Pollock added, "These latest comments smack of desperation, coming as they do at a time when there have been extremely positive signs that both the EU parliament and national legislatures are aware of the dangers that unrestricted software patents pose to innovation."

Europe's various legislative bodies have very different views on whether software patenting should be permitted. The European Council of Ministers wants to bring it in, as part of its measures to harmonize patent law across Europe, but the European Parliament has fought this move.

In September 2003, the European Parliament tried to water down the council's Directive on the Patentability of Computer-Implemented Inventions by adding amendments to it that would restrict widespread software patenting.

This move was rejected by the council in May, and the parliament is expected to begin its work again in November. Because the parliament has appointed former French Prime Minister Michel Rocard--who has described himself as a "supporter of free software"--to lead its response to the council, there is speculation that it could take a hard line.

EICTA, which represents 50 multinational companies and 32 industry associations, warned the parliament in its letter that if it wasn't possible to license patents for software-enabled inventions, Europe would lose thousands of jobs.

"Europe would become a haven for plagiarism," EICTA said. "European industry, stripped of patent protection in its home market, would lose considerable market share to those who do not invest in R&D (research and development) and simply copy."

Unsurprisingly, the FFII has a different take, arguing that software patents actually threaten innovation.

"Without patents, Europe would be a haven not for plagiarism but for innovation at its most dynamic," Pollock said.

"Moreover," Pollock added, "as all informed observers know, promoting innovation is a matter of striking a correct balance between protection and monopoly. Innovation and ideas must be 'adequately rewarded,' and this is precisely what software patents do not do."

The foundation is currently gathering testimony on software patents from British businesses and developers, which it plans to pass on to the U.K. government.

Campaigning is also taking place around Europe, with the four main German political parties all backing a move to demand changes to the European Council's position.

Graeme Wearden of ZDNet UK reported from London.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 52 Talkback(s)
Internet didn't require patents
America pioneered most of the Internet, and it was done basically as patent-free, open-source software: Ethernet, TCP/IP, telnet, FTP, HTTP, SMTP, etc. That didn't stop a huge explosion in innovation ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: alscook@... Posted on: 11/01/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
I find it ironically hilarious..  Jeff Spicoli | 10/29/04
And I thought you didn't like monopolies.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
Nothing to say Jeff? Amazing!!! (nt)  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
maybe he's gone out with a girlfriend, or friends for a beer  hipparchus2000 | 10/29/04
Nope, he is still posting to other replies.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
Relax Ax, I forgot about this article..  Jeff Spicoli | 10/29/04
So why are you avoiding the question?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
Internet didn't require patents  alscook@... | 11/01/04
Ask Bruce Perens!  Roger Ramjet | 10/29/04
Hmmm, lets take a look at it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
Fifi deserves respect.  Anton Philidor | 10/29/04
Too sides to what they say.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
bitty talks the talk  AmusedAtItAll | 10/29/04
Can you say 283 patent infringements.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
Where's the beef?  AmusedAtItAll | 10/29/04
Ask your buddies at FFII...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
Re: Ask your buddies at FFII...  AmusedAtItAll | 10/29/04
Oh, I am just so scared of your liable claim.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
Can you say 'POSSIBLY'?  quietkey | 10/29/04
It's called, "getting your ducks in a row".  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
my kids break the "swining" patent every day  hipparchus2000 | 10/29/04
er that should be "swinging"  hipparchus2000 | 10/29/04
Sure there are bad patents, I support removing them..  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
There is a reason why this is relevant  hipparchus2000 | 10/29/04
Why? Momma won't allow you to?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/30/04
Source?  IT_User | 10/29/04
In the article.  Anton Philidor | 10/29/04
Not what I asked  IT_User | 10/30/04
Following the money.  Anton Philidor | 11/01/04
Somebody's scared alright, but it's not open source people  CobraA1 | 10/29/04
You need to read...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
what you don't know is what Open Source folk have done about this already  hipparchus2000 | 10/29/04
Sure I do, Linus said don't look and don't tell.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
One guy isn't the whole movement and what tirade  hipparchus2000 | 10/29/04
Um, Bruce has said the same thing many times.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
Wnat to hear something HILARIOUS? You agree with me!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
How is using the law to protect your work (&way it is used) fear?  hipparchus2000 | 10/29/04
How is it fear? OOS is reacting right???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/30/04
You need a clue, bitty.  AmusedAtItAll | 10/29/04
Sure I'll lend you a clue.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
bitty waffles again.  AmusedAtItAll | 10/29/04
When you have lost, call names.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
you implicitly called Bruce Perens a patent thief you hippochrite  hipparchus2000 | 10/29/04
No, I did not, learn to read.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/30/04
Impeccable sources  IT_User | 10/29/04
Yuo maybe right and they are clueless.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/04
Two people?  CobraA1 | 10/29/04
Not hardly...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/30/04
Yes, let's  IT_User | 10/29/04
what if someone would of patented basic ideas  V Sanders | 10/30/04
What if water were purple...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/30/04
In principle patents on software should not be a problem but...  JeremyBarker | 10/31/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and