On CBS.com: Victoria Secret Model Contest -Vote Now!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ina Fried
Posted on ZDNet News: Nov 10, 2004 2:55:00 PM

Borrowing a line from Allstate Insurance, Microsoft says it wants customers to know they are in good hands when they choose its software.

The software maker announced on Wednesday that it will indemnify nearly all its customers against any claims that their use of Microsoft software infringed on any intellectual-property claims. The company said the protection extends to current and older versions of its software, including its Windows operating system, Office desktop software and SQL Server database.

The company already offers unlimited protection to its volume license customers but is adding the indemnity for customers who buy its key products in other ways, such as from a computer maker or even off a retail shelf.

"When we looked at things, there was no reason not to provide that coverage to all those folks as well," said David Kaefer, director of intellectual-property licensing for Microsoft. The protection covers four main types of claims: patent, copyright, trade secret and trademark.

The protection extends to nearly all of Microsoft's products, with the main exception being embedded versions of Windows, largely because customers are able to modify the code.

Of course, it's not just altruism that motivates the software maker. The company plans to make indemnity a new plank in its "Get the Facts" campaign, which touts the advantages of Windows over Linux.

Chief Executive Steve Ballmer talked about indemnity as a key differentiator during Tuesday's shareholder meeting.

"We enhance the intellectual-property indemnifications we give our customers," Ballmer said at the meeting. "We can stand behind our products in a way that open source can't because they have no one standing behind them."

Kaefer said the argument is resonating with some customers who are concerned about liability. "More and more customers are realizing you don't get what you don’t pay for," he said.

Hewlett-Packard and Novell have offered liability protection to some Linux customers, but both Microsoft and analysts note that most of the protections from the Linux vendors are more limited.

Last year, Microsoft lifted a cap for its volume-licensing customers that had limited the dollar amount of protection Microsoft offered its customers against intellectual-property claims resulting from their use of Microsoft software.

Microsoft has been beefing up its own intellectual-property portfolio, a move that Kaefer said does make it easier for Microsoft to offer such protections.

"The reason we are able to do this at all is because we have done some of the things that you have to do earlier in the process," he said.

As part of the announcement, Microsoft highlighted two customers--Regal entertainment and ADC Telecommunications--that said that indemnity was key to their choice of Windows over Linux.

"We simply aren't interested in having to worry about potential legal risks of deploying Linux in this environment," ADC Telecommunications manager Jamey Anderson said in a statement.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 68 Talkback(s)
err actually MS users have
Check out the links provided by other people to
the MS SQL server incident.

By the same token, there has only been one
company SUED for using Linux, only because they
used Unix so... (Read the rest)
Posted by: hipparchus2000 Posted on: 11/11/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Somehow this smacks of more FUD and PR  crocd | 11/10/04
The devils in the small print - LOOPHOLES  David Mohring | 11/10/04
Smells like Redhat and SCO  FilledOut | 11/10/04
Borrowing a page from Republican handbook  TrustMe_z | 11/10/04
Didn't you get the message?  Spoon Jabber | 11/10/04
Some message!  AbsolutelyNot | 11/10/04
What?  nomorems | 11/10/04
yup  Jeff Spicoli | 11/10/04
Voters  Spoon Jabber | 11/11/04
Hey Trustme, Al Gore LOST, so did Kerry.  Update victim | 11/10/04
Thank you-- I wasn't sure until you were nice enough to tell us!  Jeff Spicoli | 11/10/04
so let me see if i got this right  JasonL31 | 11/10/04
Only if...  AbsolutelyNot | 11/10/04
If only all software companies would.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/10/04
Notice  rapson | 11/10/04
Huh?  Jeff Spicoli | 11/10/04
There you go again  rapson | 11/10/04
Well you let Jesus do your thinking for you..  Jeff Spicoli | 11/10/04
Yeah, real gullable  Spoon Jabber | 11/10/04
Here ya go!  Jeff Spicoli | 11/10/04
How?  rapson | 11/10/04
Actually..  Jeff Spicoli | 11/10/04
Stealing elections  Linux_Developer | 11/10/04
Can't deal with reality huh?  Jeff Spicoli | 11/10/04
That's republican WINNERS, Jeff  Spoon Jabber | 11/10/04
Yes  rapson | 11/10/04
Heehee  Jeff Spicoli | 11/10/04
Well ofd course Carl. The ABM crowd has no choice in the matter.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/10/04
I must have missed that  rapson | 11/10/04
Why oh why?  Jeff Spicoli | 11/10/04
Keep your friends close, and your.....  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/10/04
Message has been deleted.  Jeff Spicoli | 11/10/04
Heck, delete Jeff instead of the message (NT)  Spoon Jabber | 11/10/04
I think Jeff is going for hte record of deleted posts.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/10/04
Ax, Ax, Ax...  Spoon Jabber | 11/10/04
I'm sure Cognos will be pleased  Robert Crocker | 11/10/04
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!  Jeff Spicoli | 11/10/04
...find ways to be as good thiefs!  Jeff Spicoli | 11/10/04
I am sure other software companies can infrince on IP.  B.O.F.H. | 11/10/04
Wow, talk about whining....  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/10/04
I know, time to pipe down Axy..  Jeff Spicoli | 11/10/04
Good advice, but I doubt you can follow it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/10/04
We are sure you will find something to whine about.  B.O.F.H. | 11/10/04
I wondered when you would show up...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/10/04
So, who is Microsoft infringing on now?  B.O.F.H. | 11/10/04
No thank you.  alterego_z | 11/10/04
Lousy Admins will always have problems...  Confused by religion | 11/10/04
Re: Lousy Admins  alterego_z | 11/10/04
Probably on purpose  FilledOut | 11/10/04
You missed NetWare  htotten | 11/10/04
er i thought a selling point of MS servers was ease of use  hipparchus2000 | 11/11/04
re: No thank you.0  richdave | 11/10/04
Microsoft will need every marketing pitch they can invent ...  George Mitchell | 11/10/04
Microsoft Indemnification  htotten | 11/10/04
But it puts an end to open source claims...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/10/04
You are correct.  htotten | 11/10/04
Question  Spoon Jabber | 11/10/04
Heehee  Jeff Spicoli | 11/10/04
You give yourself too much credit  Spoon Jabber | 11/10/04
Good questions.,  htotten | 11/10/04
so you're saying there was no MS indemnification before  hipparchus2000 | 11/11/04
Microsoft thinks we are that stupid?  aprilnotafool | 11/10/04
Yep, like Redhat doing likewise  FilledOut | 11/10/04
Some of the posters here are prime candidates!  B.O.F.H. | 11/10/04
This can't be right NoAx said before that MS customers were indemnified  hipparchus2000 | 11/11/04
What a cute try, wrong but still cute anyhow.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/11/04
err actually MS users have  hipparchus2000 | 11/11/04
Ballmer: "I'm Lying My @$$ Off Again."  brenthawkinsmd | 11/11/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline