On The Insider: Avril Lavigne Files for Divorce
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ingrid Marson
Posted on ZDNet News: Dec 21, 2004 4:32:00 PM

The European Union has again failed to ratify the software patent directive, after a crucial last-minute intervention from Poland.

An EU Council representative confirmed that the Computer Implemented Inventions Directive will not be adopted Tuesday, as had been planned.

According to sources close to the situation, Wlodzimierz Marcinski, Poland's undersecretary of science and information technology, spoke out at the EU Council meeting and asked that the directive be removed from the agenda.

No one objected to Poland's request, and the chairman removed the item from the agenda.

This last-minute decision to remove the item is likely to please antipatent campaigners who were unhappy that the EU Council was planning to adopt the directive without vote or discussion.

The Polish government spoke out against the proposed directive in November, saying it could not support the text because it was ambiguous and contradictory. Politicians from the Netherlands, Germany and Austria have also publicly spoken out against the directive.

Ingrid Marson of ZDNet UK reported from London.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 42 Talkback(s)
Carl Rapson, a well know Microsoft dill.
"If Microsoft had a history of using patents as a weapon, you would be right. But so far there is no history. So I think my original analogy stands."

The threats for Microsoft in the past were ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: systemcleaner Posted on: 12/22/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Great news for everybody but Microsoft.  DonnieBoy | 12/21/04
Only Microsoft?  rapson | 12/21/04
Microsoft has reason to  voska | 12/21/04
Not really  rapson | 12/21/04
Umm that's what patents are for though  voska | 12/21/04
Would you say the same about IBM?  rapson | 12/21/04
Carl Rapson, a well know Microsoft dill.  systemcleaner | 12/22/04
SCO!  Jeff Spicoli | 12/21/04
None that I've seen  rapson | 12/21/04
Might, maybe, could, possibly, perhaps, someday... Blah...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/21/04
Oh Oracle you said it to be true  voska | 12/21/04
And your selective reality needs repairing  Jeff Spicoli | 12/21/04
According to your crystal ball, axey  AmusedAtItAll | 12/22/04
Are you arguing patents or just defending Microsoft?  voska | 12/21/04
'Just' defending?  rapson | 12/21/04
If you don't fanaticaly hate MS, then your a shill.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/21/04
Well...  Jeff Spicoli | 12/21/04
Difference  rapson | 12/21/04
Really? Show me..  Jeff Spicoli | 12/21/04
Because Donnie seem very anti Microsoft  voska | 12/21/04
OK, sorry  rapson | 12/21/04
Yes, IBM's patent portfolio could be dangerous at some time too.  DonnieBoy | 12/21/04
MS has made some veiled threats on this subject  tic swayback | 12/21/04
Again, it's simply not possible...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/21/04
Actually, that's not true  tic swayback | 12/21/04
What?! You HAVE to be kidding  Jeff Spicoli | 12/21/04
MS Using Patents Indirectly Against OSS  P. Douglas | 12/21/04
I mostly agree  rapson | 12/21/04
Huh?  Jeff Spicoli | 12/21/04
Integrity has nothing to do with it  rapson | 12/21/04
Flailing at windmills again.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/21/04
Back tracking?  voska | 12/21/04
No you completely misunderstand.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/21/04
Something like a mine  IT_User | 12/21/04
Yes, Microsoft is not the only that could abuse patents.  DonnieBoy | 12/21/04
We??? Oh you mean the tiny minority of users.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/21/04
Small minority?  voska | 12/21/04
Just a teensy nitpick...  John Le'Brecage | 12/21/04
Good for them  Nigel Johnstone | 12/21/04
Good point.  Anton Philidor | 12/22/04
Not surprising ...  George Mitchell | 12/21/04
Poles push patents off EU agenda  patrice_z | 12/22/04

What do you think?

advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads