On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Stephen Shankland
Posted on ZDNet News: Jan 11, 2005 6:50:00 AM

IBM has decided to let open-source developers use 500 software patents without fear of an infringement lawsuit, a new step in its encouragement of the collaborative programming philosophy.

It is a small but significant measure for a company with major efforts to patent its research, then license those patents. Still, the vast majority of IBM's 10,000 software patents in the United States aren't being shared so freely.

The move follows that of Linux seller Red Hat, a comparatively small company that objects to software patents but allows unfettered use of its own smaller portfolio in open-source software. And Novell, the second-largest Linux seller, has vowed to use its own patent portfolio to deter and counter legal attacks against open-source software.

IBM is a vocal champion of Linux and has hundreds of programmers contributing to the development of the operating system. In August, the company pledged not to use its patent portfolio to attack Linux, and in October, the company named former microprocessor chief John Kelly to lead a new intellectual-property division.

Some fear that patents could hurt Linux, the best-known success of open-source software. A Hewlett-Packard executive warned in 2002 that he expected Linux foe Microsoft to launch patent attacks against Linux and other open-source projects, and Microsoft has begun lavishing more attention on its patent-licensing program. And a company that sells insurance to pay Linux users' legal costs, if they're sued for patent infringement, says Linux potentially violates as many as 283 patents--60 held by IBM.

Patented software could throw a monkey wrench into Linux and other open-source software. The General Public License (GPL), which governs Linux and many other open-source projects, prohibits use of software covered by a patent license that requires royalty payments. Finding such encumbered patents in open-source software could, at a minimum, force programmers to write replacement software and customers to change to the new version.

When it comes to computing patents, IBM is king. The corporation has 40,000 patents worldwide and 25,000 in the United States. In 2004, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) granted IBM another 3,248--more than any other company for the 12th consecutive year--and IBM plans to try to maintain its lead.

Hewlett-Packard was in fourth place with 1,775 patents in 2004.

IBM said the patents it's liberating cover a broad range of technologies, including linking operating system processes dynamically; protocols for exporting files; interoperability between databases and operating systems; language processing; user interfaces; and the Internet. A full list is available for download.

IBM called Tuesday's move a first step.

The company plans to grant royalty-free access to more patents in the future for open-source use, a representative said Monday. It also plans to release patents for use in open standards--a move that could make it easier to embrace such standards within open-source and proprietary software.

Open-source programs are built by cooperating developers who may freely see, modify and redistribute the software. It stands in stark contrast to proprietary software such as Microsoft's Windows operating system, IBM's WebSphere business software and Oracle's database.

Kelly said in a statement that he hopes other companies will follow suit.

"Through measures such as today's pledge, we will increasingly use patents to encourage and protect global innovation and interoperability through open standards, and we urge others to do so as well," Kelly said. "We will work with the U.S. PTO and other commentators and policy makers to ensure that the U.S. patent system continues to evolve to address the challenges of the innovation economy."

IBM will allow royalty-free use of patents in any software covered by the Open Source Initiative's Open Source Definition, the company said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 127 Talkback(s)
Not really
>>>As for your mention of MS in your reply, it seems that you believe everyone should take sides. I am not pro this company or pro that company. In fact my company is totally an IBM shop...<<<

... (Read the rest)
Posted by: AmusedAtItAll Posted on: 01/12/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
OSS has taken over this planet, earthlings, REJOICE!!!  chiwawa | 01/11/05
How will MSand the OSS community react to that!  crocd | 01/11/05
"can control OSS"?  Anton Philidor | 01/11/05
Microbaiter !!!! (NT)  Update victim | 01/11/05
SCO might have issue with this...  Mike Cox | 01/11/05
a bit weak mike  crocd | 01/11/05
I think we know  jsjag1 | 01/11/05
No_Ax! wink  crocd | 01/11/05
4.5  Real World | 01/11/05
I agree - not one of your best  shallow_diver | 01/11/05
I hate to respond to Mike in a serious manner  Squawkbox | 01/11/05
Your rep missed the ball  bugmenotznet | 01/12/05
Real linuxers hate blue evil's involvement with open source  pa2004 | 01/11/05
Mike parody trie or true opinion?  crocd | 01/11/05
Pipe dream  jsjag1 | 01/11/05
Drivel. (NT)  Zogg | 01/11/05
Nonsense  NemesisNL | 01/11/05
Be polite!  pa2004 | 01/11/05
and so?  systemcleaner | 01/11/05
Yet again...nonsense  NemesisNL | 01/11/05
10.0 Best one I've ever seen! (NT)  NonZealot | 01/11/05
If big Blue was being so generous,  low-life | 01/11/05
Missing the point  WhoDaMan | 01/11/05
Oops...  WhoDaMan | 01/11/05
Not any more...  low-life | 01/11/05
Desperation?  WhoDaMan | 01/11/05
OK.  low-life | 01/11/05
Can't put the jeanie back in the bottle, can they?  Spoon Jabber | 01/11/05
Your pseudonym fits your comment. (NT)  Update victim | 01/11/05
What's your point?  AmusedAtItAll | 01/11/05
Its good to know  low-life | 01/11/05
Not really  AmusedAtItAll | 01/12/05
Correction  AmusedAtItAll | 01/11/05
WTO - the global arm of USPTO  low-life | 01/11/05
Market Share.....  htotten | 01/11/05
Don't Hate! wink  Roger Ramjet | 01/12/05
MS, Please encourage innovation and do the same ... (nt)  Plain Logic | 01/11/05
Oh.. look.. a flying pig..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 01/11/05
A bite of forbidden fruit?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/11/05
Why?  Patrick Jones | 01/11/05
Because you can't get in a mud wrestling contest without getting dirty.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/11/05
And that still doesn't answer anything.  Patrick Jones | 01/11/05
The problem with the ignorance method...  Michael Kelly | 01/11/05
Not very realistinc...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/11/05
Not very coherent  AmusedAtItAll | 01/11/05
Who want's to wrestle here?  NemesisNL | 01/11/05
Ah, but....  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/11/05
I always thought  Spoon Jabber | 01/11/05
Yes  rapson | 01/11/05
Here in America...  AmusedAtItAll | 01/11/05
I think since most if not all are well in glasshouses  Laff | 01/11/05
True of competition, but not patent holding companies.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/11/05
Like SCO? Yes I suppose that is correct...then however  Laff | 01/11/05
But is that a good thing?  rapson | 01/11/05
Ah but in this case I think IBM is only striking back.  Laff | 01/11/05
Just to be clear I am not in any fashion against people  Laff | 01/11/05
You're too kind  Spoon Jabber | 01/11/05
Major, minor, natural evils.  Anton Philidor | 01/11/05
Spoon we should do our own documentary called  Laff | 01/11/05
Remember, Anton  Spoon Jabber | 01/11/05
Suggestion, Laff  Spoon Jabber | 01/11/05
Spoon I've been itchin for a lintchin for a long time now:)  Laff | 01/11/05
Laff, I see your dilemma happy  Spoon Jabber | 01/11/05
Oh like I don't poke fun at folk? heh heh heh...:)  Laff | 01/11/05
Why do it? and who wins?  Update victim | 01/11/05
Well  Linux User 147560 | 01/11/05
Supra, your suggestion?  Spoon Jabber | 01/11/05
Re: Supra, your suggestion?  Linux User 147560 | 01/11/05
Oooooh yeah, me likey!  Spoon Jabber | 01/11/05
RE: Oooooh yeah, me likey!  Linux User 147560 | 01/11/05
One question LU  Spoon Jabber | 01/12/05
RE: One question LU  Linux User 147560 | 01/12/05
No, not like SCO at all.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/11/05
SCO makes something? heh heh heh..snicker..:)  Laff | 01/11/05
What does Acacia have to do with this topic?  B.O.F.H. | 01/11/05
This could be very good  Update victim | 01/11/05
Let's hope so  Spoon Jabber | 01/11/05
Spoon we should do our own documentary called  Laff | 01/11/05
Deja vou!  Spoon Jabber | 01/11/05
FRENCH!!! From you Spoon!?! hee hee hee..snicker!  Laff | 01/11/05
You got me!  Spoon Jabber | 01/11/05
Well there is the....  Laff | 01/12/05
Yeah, what ever happened?  Spoon Jabber | 01/12/05
NOT root of all evil - root of all STUPIDITY  Roger Ramjet | 01/12/05
Please remember, Roger  Spoon Jabber | 01/12/05
Ya know I don't think it is the Love of money..but the  Laff | 01/12/05
Again, bitty, you are wrong  AmusedAtItAll | 01/11/05
I think you got it.....  htotten | 01/11/05
A small developer/patent holder...  Anton Philidor | 01/11/05
Of course you seem to forget  AmusedAtItAll | 01/11/05
For once I agree No_Ax  crocd | 01/11/05
Nothing is risk-free. You have to choose.  systemcleaner | 01/11/05
I suggest you take a hard look at IBM's past...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/11/05
Which past is that, bitty?  AmusedAtItAll | 01/11/05
I think that's the point  rapson | 01/11/05
How dependent on IBM's good will...  Anton Philidor | 01/11/05
IBM was careful.  Anton Philidor | 01/11/05
True, better if IBM placed them into the public doimain.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/11/05
Or the reverse, lol  voska | 01/11/05
Your bias shows.  Update victim | 01/11/05
What are you talking about?  B.O.F.H. | 01/11/05
No, IBM has a use for the patents  IT_User | 01/11/05
You wish  AmusedAtItAll | 01/11/05
And we have another one  AmusedAtItAll | 01/11/05
bitty, are you really as clueless as you come across?  AmusedAtItAll | 01/11/05
trollcatcher?  VicVics | 01/11/05
Real facts and real opinions?  AmusedAtItAll | 01/12/05
Patent detestation.  Anton Philidor | 01/11/05
Ya see, there's the difference  Monkey_MCSE | 01/11/05
Philanthropy includes choice.  Anton Philidor | 01/11/05
i agree with what you're saying....but  Monkey_MCSE | 01/11/05
I tried to head your argument off at the pass...  Anton Philidor | 01/11/05
Your thinking is what lands you with out a pay cheque  voska | 01/11/05
Not a positive change, but adapt anyway.  Anton Philidor | 01/11/05
Philanthropy?  Update victim | 01/11/05
The normal condition of software is broken.  Anton Philidor | 01/11/05
Re: Philanthropy includes choice.  none none | 01/11/05
A volunteer chooses to work free.  Anton Philidor | 01/11/05
No, not really  seosamh_z | 01/11/05
Another red herring  AmusedAtItAll | 01/12/05
the dam done broke..  sent2null | 01/11/05
Progress....NOT  Progress_z | 01/11/05
Meeting "the right people"  Anton Philidor | 01/11/05
You mentioned earlier...  Spoon Jabber | 01/11/05
Why innovate?  Anton Philidor | 01/11/05
Sort of  Spoon Jabber | 01/12/05
Thanks...  Anton Philidor | 01/12/05

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More