On CBS MoneyWatch: 11 Buzzwords That Should Be Banned
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ina Fried
Posted on ZDNet News: Jul 1, 2005 11:57:00 PM

The founder of pen computing pioneer Go filed an antitrust suit against Microsoft, claiming that the software giant violated antitrust laws by trying to thwart Go's attempt to enter the PC operating system market.

The suit, which seeks unspecified damages, was filed on Wednesday in U.S. District Court in San Francisco by S. Jerrold Kaplan, Go's founder.

"Microsoft undertook to 'kill' Go by resorting to many of the same collusive and exclusionary tactics Microsoft used against Netscape, Sun, Novell...and others," according to the complaint, which was seen by CNET News.com.

The lawsuit also claims that Microsoft stole Go technology, that the company threatened Intel, which had invested in Go, and that it used "incentives and threats" to coerce Compaq, Fujitsu, Toshiba and other computer makers not to use Go's operating system.

Microsoft spokeswoman Stacy Drake rejected Kaplan's assertions.

"These claims date back nearly 20 years," Drake said on Friday. "They were baseless then and they are baseless now."

Drake noted that handwriting recognition technology "had severe limitations in the late 1980s and early 1990s."

While Microsoft's original pen-enabled version of Windows stirred little interest, the company has continued to pursue handwriting recognition as a means of computer input, most recently with its Windows XP Tablet PC Edition.

The suit came as Microsoft resolved yet another of its outstanding antitrust matters, announcing on Friday that it has made an $850 million deal with IBM. The company has also settled antitrust claims with Sun Microsystems, AOL Time Warner, Gateway, Be and others.

The ill-fated Go was merged into an AT&T subsidiary in 1994. The company's claims were assigned to Lucent in 1996 when that company was split off from AT&T. Kaplan regained the rights to Go's claims in April, according to the lawsuit.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 51 Talkback(s)
No I think you don't know your head from your arstechnica
Twenty years ago, hmm, what CPU was popular NOT Intel! What server was storming the planet? UNIX you dork and then Novell who pretended they were as good as UNIX who is still used for mission-critic... (Read the rest)
Posted by: jmills@... Posted on: 10/11/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
More talk from MS  Richard Flude | 07/01/05
Go files antitrust suit against Microsoft  Loverock Davidson | 07/01/05
You probably think that Sun, AOL, and IBM did not have a case either.  DonnieBoy | 07/02/05
Poor LoveyDove has turned Microshill Extraordinaire  Jeff Spicoli | 07/02/05
The latest installment from that Mike Cox imitator:  Judas I. | 07/02/05
Antitrust form 20 years ago?  jmills@... | 07/01/05
You don't know your history, do you?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/03/05
No I think you don't know your head from your arstechnica  jmills@... | 10/11/05
Guess this money grab  Boot_Agnostic | 07/04/05
No, it's for real and will likely succeed.  Fred Fredrickson | 07/05/05
But...  rapson | 07/05/05
Funny even then, I couldn't buy a computer with DRDOS on it. (NT)  Update victim | 07/04/05
But you could buy a computer with PCDOS  voska | 07/04/05
Go was another company  John Zern | 07/02/05
The OS SHOULDN'T be that important.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/03/05
What are you talking about?  Squawkbox | 07/04/05
OH !  Update victim | 07/04/05
You mean FreeDOS counts as an OS  Boot_Agnostic | 07/04/05
Sorry You are wrong  Squawkbox | 07/04/05
No, you're wrong  Fred Fredrickson | 07/05/05
Still wrong!  ShadeTree | 07/06/05
Not any more  rapson | 07/06/05
Dell  richhayes | 07/05/05
Just because Dell doesn't offer it ...  ShadeTree | 07/05/05
AHH!  Real World | 07/05/05
Ha ha  Fred Fredrickson | 07/05/05
It's the new linux tax  Boot_Agnostic | 07/05/05
Wrong conclusion!  ShadeTree | 07/06/05
No that's not it  osreinstall | 07/07/05
And you point is??  michaeldschmidt | 07/07/05
Go could would should ve shined the Apple  Boot_Agnostic | 07/04/05
Next up...  Rodney Davis | 07/02/05
Uhhhh....  bugmenotznet | 07/02/05
That's my point...  Rodney Davis | 07/03/05
Read More About It (TM)  bugmenotznet | 07/02/05
Exactly.  GuyAlanDye | 07/03/05
Why did he wait so long to sue?  Rodney Davis | 07/03/05
Dunno  Mark Miller | 07/04/05
You refer to the DOJ several times  vferrara | 07/05/05
Why he waited so long to sue.....  An_Axe_to_Grind | 07/05/05
But if the case had merit...  Rodney Davis | 07/06/05
Go legal action against Microsoft  ALFRED_z | 07/02/05
So what about Apple?  michaeldschmidt | 07/07/05
Let the evidence be the seed  Boot_Agnostic | 07/04/05
Billions in the bank  voska | 07/04/05
Ongoing Criminal Enterprize!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 07/05/05
I'll bite  vferrara | 07/05/05
Not to mention...  rapson | 07/05/05
One plus One does not equal three  ShadeTree | 07/06/05
Sorry this post is to the wrong response(nt)  ShadeTree | 07/06/05
Take your Meds boy!  osreinstall | 07/07/05

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here