On CBS MoneyWatch: Best Stocks to Buy Now
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Alorie Gilbert
Posted on ZDNet News: Oct 17, 2005 10:41:00 PM

Some big names in the computer industry are pledging to make the development of desktop applications for the Linux operating system much easier than it has been.

Adobe Systems, IBM, Intel, Hewlett-Packard, Novell, RealNetworks and Red Hat are all backing the new Linux standards effort led by the Free Standards Group. The nonprofit organization plans to marshal its resources to form standards for key components of Linux desktop software, including libraries, application runtime and install time. The group said Monday that it will encourage software developers to use its guidelines when building programs for Linux as part of its Linux Standard Base project.

The goal of the project is to encourage the development of more applications for the Linux platform, the group said. Developing applications for Linux desktops is a complicated endeavor now because of significant differences between two prevailing versions, called GNOME (GNU Network Object Model Environment) and KDE (K Desktop Environment).

"With this complex and costly development and support environment, independent software vendors may choose not to target the Linux desktop, leading to reduced choice for end users and an inability to compete with proprietary operating systems," the Free Standards Group said in a statement.

The growth of Linux desktops has been slow, especially among consumers. Microsoft's Windows continues to dominate the PC world. About 90 percent of all desktops and laptops are powered by Microsoft, according to reports from research firms Gartner and IDC.

The Free Standards Group expects to release the first specification for Linux desktop software early next year and to begin certifications shortly afterward. It plans to give compliant applications a "Linux Standard Base Desktop" certification mark.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 48 Talkback(s)
This is a very much needed feature...
The driver API in Linux should at least be patch level version agnostic, remaining to be release specific. What I mean, is that there should be a way to have a stock of symbols in the kernel with each... (Read the rest)
Posted by: thetargos Posted on: 11/08/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
All I can say is  Linux Advocate | 10/17/05
No, there is another  techboy_z | 10/18/05
RE: No. there is another  wolfdogjagr | 10/19/05
MP3, APT both work in RedHat and Fedora  carlito408@... | 10/31/05
Yes, we need common binaries and installers that work on all distributions.  DonnieBoy | 10/17/05
KDE is a far better  Linux Advocate | 10/17/05
What?  just^me | 10/17/05
KDE is really clunky. Konquerer suuucks.  DonnieBoy | 10/17/05
I don't use Konqueror  Linux Advocate | 10/17/05
Yes, through the madness of the open source process, it all works out . . .  DonnieBoy | 10/17/05
Have you heard of FreeDesktop??  thetargos | 11/08/05
Thank you DonnieBoy  carlito408@... | 10/31/05
Ok, I have to admit this is the beauty of open source.  DonnieBoy | 10/17/05
Welcome to the 21st Century  Yagotta B. Kidding | 10/18/05
No, that is still NOT good enough. Libraries should be LGPL, NOT GPL  DonnieBoy | 10/18/05
For those of you that don't know, the QT license is still a problem.  DonnieBoy | 10/18/05
What's wrong with  Linux Advocate | 10/18/05
If it wasn't something as basic as the widget set,it wouldn't be a big deal  DonnieBoy | 10/18/05
I don't program...  Linux Advocate | 10/18/05
Another thing. We need a common driver model.  DonnieBoy | 10/17/05
Well here  Linux Advocate | 10/17/05
I know, Tell me about it...  just^me | 10/17/05
Yes, the driver problem will only get better after we have a common model.  DonnieBoy | 10/17/05
One barrier I have seen  Linux Advocate | 10/17/05
rip off  reedjjjr | 10/18/05
This is a very much needed feature...  thetargos | 11/08/05
wow  jmills@... | 10/17/05
Hmm...  just^me | 10/17/05
Tech firms to tackle Linux desktop standards  Loverock Davidson | 10/17/05
You sir  Linux Advocate | 10/17/05
To a certain extent  DarbyOhara | 10/18/05
Boo hoo hoo  Loverock Davidson | 10/18/05
Why, you ask?  John Zern | 10/18/05
You must be referring to UnitedLinux.  Michael Kelly | 10/18/05
Troll...  jasonp@... | 10/18/05
Here you go, Love  carlito408@... | 10/31/05
Hey, get this, I just bought something that works with Linux, NOT Windows!!  DonnieBoy | 10/17/05
Is it just me....  DarbyOhara | 10/18/05
I would want one  Real World | 10/18/05
Well, Linux had the usb-serial driver built-in. With Windows, it was not  DonnieBoy | 10/18/05
Nope  Real World | 10/18/05
It is always easier if you can just plug it in and go. Now, I have to keep  DonnieBoy | 10/18/05
I have other uses for the device besides just running the configuration  DonnieBoy | 10/18/05
real world applications  reedjjjr | 10/18/05
Amen. Windows has no place in control systems, even for configuration.  DonnieBoy | 10/18/05
Another Linux Group - Good Luck  jpr75_z | 10/18/05
You made some good observations, but . . .  DonnieBoy | 10/18/05
If only M$ would....  nyabdns | 10/18/05

What do you think?

advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads