On mySimon: Holiday Gifts Under $50
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Stephen Shankland
Posted on ZDNet News: Jan 16, 2006 7:30:00 PM

The Free Software Foundation on Monday released the first public discussion draft of the General Public License version 3, shedding light on proposed reforms to the document's patent and digital rights management provisions.

The GPL version 3 draft can be downloaded from the FSF's Web site, which also includes an explanation of the changes and an online commentary section. The revised GPL is the subject of a conference this week at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

The foundation is revising the GPL for the first time in 15 years, and this time the organization is accepting suggestions from the broad base of people and organizations now involved in the free software and open-source software movements. Over the last decade and a half, the GPL grew from an academic curiosity created by programmer and FSF founder Richard Stallman into a critical foundation of much of the software realm.

The GPL governs countless open-source projects, including the Linux kernel, the Samba file server software and the MySQL database. "It's tremendously important," Tom Carey, an intellectual property attorney at Boston-based Bromberg & Sunstein, said in an earlier interview. "Probably most lawyers who have an active practice in the software area have read the GPL and committed its essence to memory, which is something you can't say about any other license."

The proposed GPL revisions include expected changes in several areas:

• Provisions to make sure digital rights management mechanisms don't curtail software freedoms;

• An explicit grant of patent rights by anyone redistributing GPL-governed software;

• A retaliation clause that prohibits an organization from using privately modified GPL software if it files a patent infringement lawsuit relating to that software;

• And new terms describing how copyright holders may add additional licensing terms, such as more-severe patent retaliation provisions, to GPL software.

Regarding the new patent provisions, Aberdeen Group analyst Stacey Quandt said, "GPL 3 is an improvement over its predecessor." But she also predicted the issue "will likely spark debate." In addition, in the GPL 3 draft, it's "not necessarily clear what constitutes a derivative work," a central concept that describes modified versions of a program, she said.

The FSF hopes to complete GPL version 3 by Jan. 15, 2007, but is giving itself until March 2007. A second discussion draft is planned to be released June, with a possible third in October.

GPL-governed software is widely used in the technology industry. However, there are many other open-source licenses in use. Sun Microsystems, for example, is touting its Community Development and Distribution License as an alternative.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 86 Talkback(s)
Or Restriction
"it's usually the result of philosophical differences or a personal spat."

Like when XFree lost thier mind in thier license.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Suicida| Posted on: 02/15/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
GPL is pointless...  Mike Cox | 01/16/06
going with 6.5  Monkey_MCSE | 01/16/06
Ah! 7.1, not bad Mikey. I especially like your telling ...  Judas I. | 01/16/06
Only a 6 ...  ac2_z | 01/16/06
You're losing your touch Mike  Steve Z | 01/16/06
Evidence?  nalyd357 | 01/16/06
You must be a new fish.  shallow_diver | 01/17/06
mike more intensity  toxicfreak | 01/18/06
Should have a clause so you can't use ANY GPLed software if you file an  DonnieBoy | 01/16/06
Don't think so...  John L. Ries | 01/16/06
Yes, it would be legal. If it were part of the GPL, you would only give  DonnieBoy | 01/16/06
Pretend you're talking to a demon who wants to twist your words ...  __howard__ | 01/16/06
Read again what I am saying. I did not include proprietary software in the  DonnieBoy | 01/16/06
Does IBM distribute Linux?  __howard__ | 01/16/06
They Let Red Hat and SuSE do that  Edward Meyers | 01/16/06
If they ship computers with factory installed Linux, they are distributing  DonnieBoy | 01/17/06
Not ALL Patents...  krehbiel | 01/17/06
But, they can NOT exclude any patents. True, if a given patent  DonnieBoy | 01/17/06
Isn't this clause pretty much useless?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
More restriction  Suicida| | 02/15/06
Hmmm...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/16/06
You probably won't have any worries  Michael Kelly | 01/16/06
NOT true, the GPL allows you to distribute under newer versions WITHOUT  DonnieBoy | 01/16/06
Depends ...  __howard__ | 01/16/06
If they used the GPL v2, they agree to that clause. That clause is PART  DonnieBoy | 01/16/06
That clause you quoted  Michael Kelly | 01/17/06
But if you put a version number, users can still distribute copies under  DonnieBoy | 01/17/06
Ok, I just realized that it was a suggested way to apply  DonnieBoy | 01/17/06
False  John L. Ries | 01/17/06
Ok, thanks, I had not realized that.  DonnieBoy | 01/17/06
Correct me if I'm wrong!  Cratig | 01/17/06
Derivitive Work  Patrick Jones | 01/17/06
Grrr  CobraA1 | 01/17/06
Not acceptable...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
I just don't know if I agree with their DRM stance  Michael Kelly | 01/16/06
Well, we certainly DO want to be able to play movies on Linux.  DonnieBoy | 01/16/06
DRM applied to software code  krehbiel | 01/17/06
I agree  Patrick Jones | 01/17/06
But why would they go out of their way to say that?  Michael Kelly | 01/17/06
Because the it's about plhilosophy more than anything else  CobraA1 | 01/17/06
Upon re-reading...  Patrick Jones | 01/17/06
More than a jab at DRM..  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
Nope  Patrick Jones | 01/17/06
Re: More than a jab at DRM..  none none | 01/17/06
none none: I DO want DRM so does corporations.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
None None, Why?  Patrick Jones | 01/17/06
Re: none none: I DO want DRM so does corporations.  none none | 01/17/06
None None: Afraid not...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
Re: None None, Why?  none none | 01/17/06
none noen, keep thinking that...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
No_axe: What is the problem, and why is DRM the only solution?  CobraA1 | 01/17/06
Tons of reasons...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
A serious question for No_ax...  Michael Kelly | 01/17/06
hmm . . .  CobraA1 | 01/18/06
Wrong...  techboy_z | 01/17/06
software  ipfresh@... | 01/17/06
Can the GPL really be enforced overseas...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
Doesn't matter  John L. Ries | 01/17/06
I agree, to an extent...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
That would be up to copyright holders  John L. Ries | 01/17/06
That remains to be seen...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
Well,  Patrick Jones | 01/17/06
Neither will ever happen.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
Never say never..  Patrick Jones | 01/17/06
Re: Neither will ever happen.  none none | 01/17/06
I did at work  Patrick Jones | 01/18/06
Re: Can the GPL really be enforced overseas...  none none | 01/17/06
Was there a point?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
No free software license can prevent that  John L. Ries | 01/17/06
So you agree we could see an Asian specific version of Linux.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
Sure (that's being worked on now)  John L. Ries | 01/17/06
Ummm, the Asian market is larger than all others combined.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
Red Flag Linux came out in 2000.  B.O.F.H. | 01/17/06
Or Restriction  Suicida| | 02/15/06
Um..  Patrick Jones | 01/17/06
No, a very few people have it...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
Sure...  Patrick Jones | 01/17/06
Buy yourself a clue.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
You were there?  Patrick Jones | 01/18/06
If the GPL is unenforceable, chances are so are other licenses (nt)  CobraA1 | 01/18/06
Pleeaasse  dekirk6@... | 01/17/06
Re:  Patrick Jones | 01/17/06
The most suprising thing is that nobody is reacting, all is quiet.  DonnieBoy | 01/17/06
I don't find it surprising at all  Michael Kelly | 01/17/06
I think folks are trying to decide their position.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
for once, I agree  CobraA1 | 01/18/06

What do you think?

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here