On CHOW: Turkey recipes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ina Fried
Posted on ZDNet News: Jan 30, 2006 7:19:00 PM

Microsoft has begun e-mailing its corporate customers worldwide, letting them know that they may need to start using a different version of Office as a result of a recent legal setback.

The software maker said Monday that it has been forced to issue new versions of Office 2003 and Office XP, which change the way Microsoft's Access database interacts with its Excel spreadsheet.

The move follows a verdict last year by a jury in Orange County, Calif., which found in favor of a patent claim by Guatemalan inventor Carlos Armando Amado. Microsoft was ordered to pay $8.9 million in damages for infringing Amado's 1994 patent. That award covered sales of Office between March 1997 and July 2003.

"It was recently decided in a court of law that certain portions of code found in Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003, Microsoft Office Access 2003, Microsoft Office XP Professional and Microsoft Access 2002 infringe a third-party patent," Microsoft said in an e-mail to customers. "As a result, Microsoft must make available a revised version of these products with the allegedly infringing code replaced."

Although existing customers can keep using older versions on current machines, any new installations of Office 2003 will require Service Pack 2, released by Microsoft in September. Office XP will need to be put into use with a special patch applied.

Microsoft is also recommending that customers update their existing software with the new code.

"We understand that this will create an inconvenience for a small percentage of our customers and are committed to working with them through the process and easing the inconvenience as best as possible," Sunny Jensen Charlebois, a Microsoft senior product manager, said in a statement to CNET News.com. The company is readying an all-new version of Office, code-named Office 12, that is due out later this year.

Microsoft would not say how many customers are affected, but said it is likely only a "small fraction" of Office users. However, the company appears to be requiring all companies to use the new version from now on, so most large organizations could be affected by the move.

The software maker started notifying customers this month, in an e-mail sent via its sales channel. All those affected will have been informed by next month, Microsoft said.

The company said the necessary downloads are available from its Web site.

Gartner analyst Michael Silver said it is hard to estimate the cost to customers, but said it is a significant impact for companies to move to a new service pack of a major program such as Office.

"It's probably a multimonth effort" for companies that want to double-check that key databases and critical Excel macros all work, Silver said. The other option is to "roll the dice" and just switch to the new software, but "most companies don’t want to do that with critical resources," he added.

The question for companies, though, is if they are exposing themselves to potential legal liability if they don't quickly move to the new software. Microsoft promises to indemnify customers from third-party patent claims, but Silver said the license terms also require customers to "immediately" move to any new noninfringing version that Microsoft releases.

"Immediate is pretty quick," Silver said. "It would be nice if there was some sort of time line that says you have to do it within six months or a year."

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 169 Talkback(s)
Not Really
Remember that "Indemnity" means they will protect you if *YOU* get sued over a patent that they infringed. It doesn't mean that, if *THEY* screw up and get sued, then you don't and up with a lot of h... (Read the rest)
Posted by: cwtryon Posted on: 03/02/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
No biggy  Boot_Agnostic | 01/30/06
Open source software not necessarily free of Patent Infringments  drhender | 01/30/06
This is a cease and desist order I own the Patent  IceTheNet@... | 01/30/06
RE: This is a cease and desist order I own the Patent  OmegaFirebolt | 01/30/06
Not exactly...  Still Lynn | 01/30/06
you are missing the point  eLurker | 01/30/06
No biggy  c-o-b | 01/31/06
Howdy  Boot_Agnostic | 01/31/06
Oh the joys of patents! (NT)  P. Douglas | 01/30/06
The patent situation has gotten so NUTS that all the  Laff | 01/30/06
Patents of Software  jack@... | 01/30/06
Music to the RIAA's Ears  kjgslg@... | 01/30/06
Patents vs Copyright??  mtn.brk@... | 01/30/06
It changed in 1995  wookey | 01/30/06
I love how these patent trolls ...  Too Old For IT | 01/30/06
What patent number?  Nigel Johnstone | 01/30/06
To be critical of the article.  MO411 | 01/31/06
Microsoft Indemnity Against IP Claims  Nigel Johnstone | 01/30/06
re:Microsoft Indemnity Against IP Claims  Edward@... | 01/31/06
And yet  lengua99 | 02/05/06
Not Really  cwtryon | 03/02/06
Kill software patents  jrepin | 01/30/06
Kill software patents  stevem_001 | 01/30/06
So that means...  WayneB@... | 01/30/06
Yes Exactly  Nigel Johnstone | 01/30/06
Greener pastures??? And that would be...Where??  Cayble | 01/30/06
Free as in?  Too Old For IT | 01/30/06
Well yeah, I've heard your argument before...  ArtMac | 01/30/06
Yup!  Update victim | 01/30/06
No...  techboy_z | 01/30/06
No. That's what copyright protection is for.  The King's Servant | 01/30/06
Killing us???  Bearberries | 01/30/06
Amen  ArtMac | 01/30/06
Show me your inventions  Nigel Johnstone | 01/30/06
Remember GIF?  MO411 | 01/31/06
Another peon defending the Robber Barons...  hulse_kevin | 01/30/06
really don't agree with that emotional plea  ej00807 | 01/30/06
PAYBACK!  tedego | 01/30/06
And yet...  rapson | 01/30/06
Yes...  ArtMac | 01/30/06
Patent Infringement "Breaking the Law"  PMC-CON | 01/30/06
Well then  ArtMac | 01/30/06
Missing the point.  Still Lynn | 01/30/06
Um...  Real World | 01/31/06
Of course! However...  Dr_Zinj | 01/31/06
???  eLurker | 01/30/06
Wow! 500,000 desktops  StorageGuru | 01/30/06
i can  eLurker | 01/30/06
it is hard?  sackbut | 01/30/06
t-bone: ok  eLurker | 01/30/06
never have -  ArtMac | 01/30/06
you brought it up  eLurker | 01/30/06
How easily will Microsoft be able to rewrite?  I am Gorby | 01/30/06
that is the issue, isnt it?  eLurker | 01/30/06
Amen, I say...  ArtMac | 01/30/06
You poor clueless fool  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/30/06
Is a license not a copywrite?  ArtMac | 01/30/06
License vs. copyright  FirstNLastN | 01/30/06
No, a license is a license, nothing more.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/30/06
ummm  eLurker | 01/30/06
Wow. There was a time when....  John Zern | 01/30/06
Jya... Jeez...  ArtMac | 01/30/06
Get a good lawyer to argue...  The King's Servant | 01/30/06
Mutually ensured destruction!  I am Gorby | 01/30/06
which means  eLurker | 01/30/06
Guatemalan ?  drdug | 01/30/06
Why not mention it?  el1jones | 01/30/06
Zenophobe?  Ghostdog36c | 01/30/06
Definitions...  Chryse | 01/30/06
It could mean  ArtMac | 01/30/06
Fear of Novel Management tools?  The King's Servant | 01/30/06
Nationality may be pertinent  Dr_Zinj | 01/31/06
Maybe you are the xenophobe...  MV_z | 02/03/06
Well then...  ArtMac | 01/30/06
Go Play With Safari Some Place Else (nt)  PMC-CON | 01/30/06
which means...  ArtMac | 01/30/06
you might  eLurker | 01/30/06
let's see...  ArtMac | 01/30/06
neither  eLurker | 01/30/06
Explain this to me.  DemonX | 01/30/06
You're right, naturally,  ArtMac | 01/30/06
Are You by Any Chance A New Version of DonnieBoy?(nt)  PMC-CON | 01/30/06
That has dark overtones,  ArtMac | 01/30/06
Same coin, different side.  The King's Servant | 01/30/06
patent infringement != code ripping  Allstar_z | 01/30/06
Prove that  ArtMac | 01/30/06
ok  eLurker | 01/30/06
The reason  stephen0838_z | 01/30/06
Patents abound  jsjag1 | 01/30/06
You obviously haven't tried to  ArtMac | 01/30/06
Yeah right...  artplus@... | 01/30/06
Yeah, I get where you're coming from...  ArtMac | 01/30/06
but where are you coming from?  eLurker | 01/30/06
I've got no problem with MS,  ArtMac | 01/30/06
you have some sort of problem  eLurker | 01/30/06
very forgiving of you  davagain | 01/30/06
Best post for this article...by far (nt)  Real World | 01/31/06
check the dates on that  rock06r | 01/30/06
I have to agree  Leria | 01/30/06
Yes.....Way too far  catlovr-20723788969807198650981698774804 | 01/30/06
What did the court do?  ArtMac | 01/30/06
Software patents are good ...  phil@... | 01/30/06
What patent number?  Nigel Johnstone | 01/30/06
Think again...  artplus@... | 01/30/06
?  eLurker | 01/30/06
Thank you  ArtMac | 01/30/06
Guatemala, Mexico, Latino...  The King's Servant | 01/30/06
some are, some are not  tima_z | 01/30/06
Patent on software are good, not patents on code  Leria | 01/30/06
Re: Patent on software are good, not patents on code  Programmer384 | 01/30/06
re: sw patents in europe  werner2k_z | 01/31/06
Insanity  sjpatrick | 01/30/06
Would have been far easier  Ken_z | 01/30/06
But...  rapson | 01/30/06
What's the difference?  tic swayback | 01/30/06
The difference is...  rapson | 01/31/06
Okay, Rapson. I'll bite.  The King's Servant | 01/30/06
Two points  rapson | 01/31/06
Why are we arguing?  The King's Servant | 01/31/06
You mean YOUR villainy...  John Zern | 01/30/06
For every processor...  ArtMac | 01/30/06
That's still a different issue  woot! | 01/30/06
My humble apologies.  sjpatrick | 01/30/06
Ahem...  ArtMac | 01/30/06
Patent  Jafrh | 01/30/06
A five year limit on software patents  John CarrollZDNet Moderator | 01/30/06
But what  ArtMac | 01/30/06
I think you may be confusing  tima_z | 01/30/06
then you  Shelendrea | 01/31/06
Probably not  j.m.galvin | 01/30/06
Re : Probably not  bushell@... | 01/30/06
Re-think...  Still Lynn | 01/30/06
How about ZERO  Mectron | 01/30/06
The irony  Richard Flude | 01/30/06
ZDNet headlines... Sheesh... It's NOT an upgrade.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/30/06
wow...  ArtMac | 01/30/06
That depends on how you look at it..  Patrick Jones | 01/31/06
What does 'up' mean?  The King's Servant | 01/31/06
Not an Upgrade???  30bob1 | 01/31/06
Correction: users have a cost associated with the update...  The King's Servant | 01/31/06
Why?  Gravitas@... | 01/30/06
Sigh.  woot! | 01/30/06
you have fallen for it  eLurker | 01/30/06
The trouble is  pbiss | 01/30/06
No 'technical' requirement now  Nigel Johnstone | 01/30/06
Obvious patents...  astro_z | 01/30/06
What's good for the goose...  HypnoToad | 01/30/06
What friggin planet are you from???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/30/06
You do not cooperate in a competitive market.  osreinstall | 01/30/06
What is a software patent?  newgeek2be | 01/30/06
When you could talk to CPM  npolimeni@... | 01/30/06
This is the system that Bill Gates is fighting so hard to implement in E.U.  mobrien_12@... | 01/30/06
Good one, let your customer pay instead of  tombalablomba | 01/31/06
Software patents are NOT bad.  jimroar2000 | 01/31/06
Sssorry, but IP is an oxymoron,  Update victim | 01/31/06
You are correct, but whats there in Microsoft's Office???  vinshe | 02/11/06
Can't make money any more? Share it on Emule  GreatInca | 01/31/06
All patent laws must die [nt]  Omch'Ar | 01/31/06
Re: Correction  30bob1 | 01/31/06
Re: Correction: users have a cost associated with the update...  30bob1 | 01/31/06
OOOOPS  30bob1 | 01/31/06
How come do they have time for it?  adelagza@... | 01/31/06
REPLIES  tonyscot@... | 01/31/06
Garbage  biggestred | 02/01/06
Failure of aquiring technology  pj-xmesh | 02/01/06
All entities affected by M$'s GREED and patent Steeling should  btljooz | 02/01/06
Patents  jervin | 02/01/06
15 - Luv GPL leads  greavesg | 02/08/06
Microsoft Starts To Fight A Losing Battle...  vinshe | 02/11/06

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here