On TV.com: Julie is HOT (and so is TV in a FLASH)
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Stephen Shankland
Posted on ZDNet News: Apr 4, 2006 12:47:00 PM

BOSTON--Open Source Development Labs is previewing work that attempts to make life easier for software companies by bridging GNOME and KDE, the two competing graphical interfaces most widely used with Linux.

The effort, called Portland Project, began showing its first software tools on Tuesday in conjunction with this week's LinuxWorld Conference & Expo here. Using them, a software company can write a single software package that works using either of the prevailing graphical interfaces.

LinuxWorld Boston 2006 roundup

OSDL and a cooperating group called Freedesktop.org, which is already working on unifying interface issues, plan to release a beta version of the software in May and version 1.0 in June. Ultimately, advocates hope that it will be part of a larger but separate effort called Linux Standard Base, which is designed to make the operating system easier for software companies to use.

Portland Project began as a meeting among developers at OSDL in Portland, Ore., in December, organizers said. KDE and the GNOME Foundation both endorsed the project.

Unlike Windows and Mac OS X, Linux has two major sets of graphical interfaces. This presents people with different items, such as control panels; complicates cut-and-paste operations; and requires programmers to be aware of what underpinnings they're using for elements such as dialogue boxes or pull-down menus.

It's common for software packages with both interfaces to be installed on Linux machines, enabling programs created for either to run smoothly, but that circumstance isn't guaranteed.

Portland Project is working on two ways to gloss over the differences, a set of command-line tools and an application programming interface called DAPI. OSDL, a nonprofit consortium founded in 2000 by computing-industry heavyweights and employing Linux leader Linus Torvalds, began working on desktop Linux issues in 2003.

"Portland is promising because the historical lack of uniformity across KDE and GNOME has made it difficult for ISVs to build a single application that integrates well in both environments," Linux Standard Base chairman Ian Murdock said in an interview. But, he added, the Portland Project is just one step of many that are needed.

The Linux Standard Base plans to add the software libraries of KDE and GNOME, called Qt and Gtk, respectively, to version 3.1 of its standard. That version is scheduled to debut in early May, while version 3.2 due in early 2007 will incorporate the Portland Project's work, Murdock said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 40 Talkback(s)
Blah blah blah
What the hell are you talking about? (Read the rest)
Posted by: thunderdome1 Posted on: 04/05/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Why?  nucrash | 04/04/06
This will NOT make the two interfaces more similar.  DonnieBoy | 04/04/06
can't handle a complicated GUI  xuniL_z | 04/04/06
Pointless random rant (nt)  thunderdome1 | 04/05/06
This is great, choice with compatibility!!  DonnieBoy | 04/04/06
Choice is great...  xuniL_z | 04/04/06
Who are you speaking for?  thunderdome1 | 04/05/06
KDE sucks  pa2004 | 04/04/06
The reality of the situation is that KDE will be around for somt time, we  DonnieBoy | 04/04/06
No way  Tim Patterson | 04/04/06
Sigh. Please don't get into KDE vs GNOME  mosborne | 04/04/06
Finally!!!  xuniL_z | 04/04/06
It's not the Linux users who have a problem being open minded..  nomorems | 04/04/06
RE: It's not the Linux users who have a problem being open minded..  richdave | 04/04/06
My favorite is GNOME, but, I want applications to be compatible between  DonnieBoy | 04/04/06
Don't make me laugh  ITTech001 | 04/04/06
No, all people being forced to do the same thing does NOT lead to inovation  DonnieBoy | 04/04/06
I know where you are coming from  ITTech001 | 04/04/06
It's called competition  Yagotta B. Kidding | 04/04/06
The car analogy is not correct  xuniL_z | 04/04/06
Not necessarily  mosborne | 04/04/06
Huh?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 04/04/06
Actually  mosborne | 04/04/06
Your opinion  Linux User 147560 | 04/04/06
And, why stop here, how about a compatibility layer for Windows so that  DonnieBoy | 04/04/06
For the last 3 years I have been developing  Hugh Jass | 04/04/06
About time  ITTech001 | 04/04/06
Your fixes aren't needed  thunderdome1 | 04/04/06
Hardly an attitude grow linux on the desktop  ITTech001 | 04/04/06
Binary compatibility  chemist109 | 04/04/06
So?  ITTech001 | 04/04/06
That wouldn't be an improvement  tommyhigbee | 04/04/06
Your attitude sucks too  thunderdome1 | 04/05/06
the OS.  xuniL_z | 04/04/06
Partially  thunderdome1 | 04/05/06
Don't fix what isn't broken...  chemist109 | 04/04/06
Ask me a hard one  Yagotta B. Kidding | 04/04/06
Competition remember, those who cried...  SouthernPride | 04/04/06
Blah blah blah  thunderdome1 | 04/05/06
The article has it wrong  dow@... | 04/04/06

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads