On TechRepublic: 10 dying IT skills
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ingrid Marson
Posted on ZDNet News: May 25, 2006 4:42:00 PM

A correction was made to this story. Read below for details.

The OpenDocument Format has come under attack from Microsoft, which claims its Office Open XML format has significantly better performance.

"The use of OpenDocument documents is slower to the point of not really being satisfactory," Alan Yates, the general manager of Microsoft's information worker strategy, told ZDNet UK on Wednesday. "The Open XML format is designed for performance. XML is fundamentally slower than binary formats, so we have made sure that customers won't notice a big difference in performance."

Yates cited a study carried out by ZDNet.com that compared OpenOffice.org 2.0 with the XML formats in Microsoft Office 2003. But Marino Marcich, the managing director of the ODF Alliance, said this was not a fair comparison, as it did not test Open XML itself and examined only one implementation of the OpenDocument Format (ODF).

"There's simply no Open XML product on the market yet, to compare performance," Marcich said. "ODF is supported and implemented not just by OpenOffice, but by multiple applications including StarOffice, IBM Workplace, KOffice, Abiword/Gnumeric and Google Writely. All these applications have different performance behaviors."

He added that OpenOffice.org was not initially optimized for ODF, but will be in the future.

Marcich said Open XML is harder for companies to implement as it has more than 4,000 pages of documentation, compared with 700 for ODF.

"A skeptic might say the documentation is so long so only one application will support it well," he said. "On my initial reading of the (Open XML) documentation, it looks like Microsoft is trying to reinvent the wheel, while ODF freely refers to existing standards like SVG," or Scalable Vector Graphics.

But Yates said the Open XML documentation is longer because it is covering more functionality.

"The documentation is so much deeper than that for the OpenDocument Format--it represents much more functionality, many more options and a deeper, richer customer experience," Yates said.

Earlier this month, the International Organization for Standardization approved ODF, a move research firm Gartner predicted would thwart Microsoft's chances of getting Open XML approved by ISO.

Yates disagreed with Gartner's analysis and said there was "plenty of room for multiple document formats."

The Gartner analysis "was very surprising and ill-informed," he said. "We've encouraged the analysts to gather more data and understand the depth of the situation."

Last week, ECMA International, a European standards body, published an intermediate draft of the Open XML format. ECMA is expected to make a decision about the format by the end of the year, according to Yates.

Ingrid Marson of ZDNet UK reported from London.

 

Correction: This story misstated the approval process for the Open XML format. ECMA is expected to make a decision on it by the end of the year.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 59 Talkback(s)
ODF is just as fast as MS's offering.
Here's the proof:

Open George Ou's test file in OpenOffice and then save it as an .ods file. Then open the .ods file in Gnumeric (one of the office apps implementing the ODF format).

No... (Read the rest)
Posted by: libertyaikido Posted on: 06/01/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Credit where due  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/25/06
Good question  John CarrollZDNet Moderator | 05/25/06
Come on John, try to make an argument here. Or is your last name really  DonnieBoy | 05/25/06
Learn to read...  John CarrollZDNet Moderator | 05/25/06
Agreed  nucrash | 05/25/06
Story has been updated to link to me  georgeou | 05/26/06
This is such rubbish  mosborne | 05/26/06
What annoyed me about George's test...  bportlock | 05/27/06
Atypical tests  INGOTIAN | 05/29/06
M$ criminal lies & FUD  Linux Geek | 05/25/06
To Microsoft: Vista is too slow.  DonnieBoy | 05/25/06
What exactly (with a GUI) is swift on the recommended minimums  JoeMama_z | 05/25/06
Yes MS thinks the speed of ODF is important, but want you to overlook Vista  DonnieBoy | 05/25/06
eh who's to say....  JoeMama_z | 05/25/06
save/load time  Scott W | 05/27/06
Lier !!  not of this world | 05/25/06
The key word is "optimized". I am sure that the performance of reading and  DonnieBoy | 05/25/06
Well-known  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/25/06
Sounds more like MS used a trick implementation to make it faster, the same  DonnieBoy | 05/25/06
You misunderstand  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/25/06
Well, in any regard, sounds to me like an implementation trick, NOT a file  DonnieBoy | 05/25/06
You are more cracked than Mike Cox  nucrash | 05/25/06
And, again, tell us how the file format can make for faster load and save  DonnieBoy | 05/25/06
ODF is a relatively pure XML implementation Microsoft XML is not.  stevey_d | 05/27/06
MS is really strugling to describe what is wrong with ODF. Funny to listen  DonnieBoy | 05/25/06
Ask me a hard one  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/25/06
LMAO  enduser_z | 05/25/06
Bad word files too  maxo_z | 05/25/06
I think I said that  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/25/06
My experience with StarOffice  PB_z | 05/25/06
Slow graphs in OOo  johnay | 05/26/06
Yes but OpenOffice isn't the only tool using ODF  stevey_d | 05/27/06
Wasn't talking about large files, or Excel.  johnay | 05/30/06
Perhaps you should  Update victim | 05/26/06
But it was at the same age level as ODF. (NT)  Update victim | 05/26/06
About a million years ago  specialk_z | 05/25/06
What we suspected from George in the very beginning...  Richard Flude | 05/25/06
This is a load of bull.  DemonX | 05/25/06
George's specialty: Irrelevant statistics  Chad_z | 05/26/06
OO2 is slow with large files  stevey_d | 05/27/06
And another thing.  DemonX | 05/25/06
Didn't they also say Open Source was a Cancer??? (nt)  Plain Logic | 05/25/06
MSFT references George Ou "research"  Chad_z | 05/26/06
Its JUST a format  Roger Ramjet | 05/26/06
There are those who will and those who won't  fwood_4@... | 05/26/06
well I like microsoft office, but this isn't doing microsoft any favours  stevey_d | 05/27/06
To each their own  Boot_Agnostic | 05/27/06
A format can't be slow  Mechano | 05/28/06
A FORMAT CAN BE SLOW  zdnet@... | 05/29/06
I don't buy it  fireball74 | 05/29/06
Buy it.  dave.leigh@... | 05/29/06
asn.1 and binary xml  stevey_d | 05/29/06
And MS software is the epitome of speed and efficiency?  INGOTIAN | 05/29/06
Pot calling the kettle black...  Ratzmandious | 05/29/06
Too slow?  code_flogger | 05/29/06
Who is Microsoft kidding?!  Leria | 05/29/06
OpenDocument is NOT an application  jdeisenberg | 05/30/06
An application can make something run slow  Boot_Agnostic | 05/31/06
ODF is just as fast as MS's offering.  libertyaikido | 06/01/06

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here