On TV.com: HOUSE's New Formula for Excellence
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ina Fried
Posted on ZDNet News: Jun 15, 2006 4:00:00 AM

Parallels, a start-up whose software enables Macs to run Microsoft Windows and the Mac OS at the same time, says it is ready with a final version of its product.

Apple Computer made headlines back in April when it said it would offer its own software--Boot Camp--for loading Windows onto Macs. However, Boot Camp permits people to run only one operating system at a time, meaning either Windows or the Mac OS can be in use, but not both at once.

Around the same time, Parallels started testing for its Parallels Desktop program, which uses virtualization technology to have Windows programs operate alongside Mac applications. The Windows programs open in a separate window within the Mac OS.

Unlike past software that allowed Windows programs to run on a Mac, Parallels Desktop does not need to emulate the hardware that's inside a PC. That's because Macs and PCs now use the same Intel-based chips. As a result, the speed of Parallels is far better than past efforts at bringing together the two operating systems, the software start-up said. In fact, Parallels says Windows programs can run nearly as fast through its virtualization as running natively on a Windows PC.

"The difference in performance between Parallels and Boot Camp is negligible," said Parallels marketing manager Ben Rudolph. "Things move very, very fast."

Being able to run Windows programs is seen as a potentially significant catalyst for Mac sales. Needham analyst Charlie Wolf upgraded Apple's stock on Tuesday, saying that the combination of Boot Camp and programs like Parallels could help the Cupertino, Calif.-based company gain market share.

"The trigger for our upgrade is the prospect that a significant number of Windows users will switch to a Mac once it's able to run Windows applications," Wolf wrote in a report. He cited a survey by his firm, which found that in the U.S., some 8 percent of home PC owners would switch to a Mac if it could run Windows. "An increase of this magnitude would almost triple Apple's share in the home market and increase it 75 percent worldwide," Wolf wrote.

Put through its paces
The Parallels software has been in testing since April, and more than 100,000 people have tried it out, according to the company. Interest has come not only from hobbyists eager to try out Microsoft's operating system on their Mac at home, but also from governments, businesses and schools that want to have their Macs better able to converse in a Windows-dominated world.

Parallels Windows on Mac

Canada's University of Waterloo, for example, has been testing Parallels software. It plans to use it in the Mac lab of its environmental studies department so students can benefit from a number of programs that aren't available for Apple machines.

"I've been very impressed with the performance of it," said Don Duff-McCracken, a graphics and computer-aided design systems manager at the university. Duff-McCracken said he has been using the Parallels tool to run processor-intensive software, such as the World Construction Set software for rendering terrain.

Duff-McCracken compared applications in Parallels with the same ones running directly in Windows via Boot Camp. The performance in Parallels was within 1 to 2 percent of the other, he said. And both Mac-based options were faster than some recently acquired Dell machines the school had.

"It's running this sophisticated software at native speeds," he said.

While Boot Camp is essentially a tool for letting a Mac run either Windows or the Mac OS, Parallels makes both operating systems available at the same time. To do this, Windows runs as what is known as a virtual machine--essentially acting as if it was a separate PC.

Boot Camp, meanwhile, is still in beta, though Apple has said it will be part of Leopard, the next version of Mac OS X. The company is expected to outline Leopard's key features at a developer conference in August.

Parallels plans to eventually charge $79 for its software, though it is selling it for $49 for the next 30 days. It has been offering it for $10 less than that for beta testers who pre-ordered the final version.

A potential challenge for the start-up is that Apple may decide to offer, in addition to Boot Camp, a feature that acts more like Parallels in allowing Windows programs to run within the Mac OS. There has been speculation that Leopard might have such abilities.

Rudolph said Parallels can't spend its time worrying about what others might do.

"All we do is virtualization," he said. "Apple has got hundreds of different products. I believe we are going to have a faster, better solution regardless of what happens."

Herndon, Va.-based Parallels got its start when its two founders were doing freelance help-desk work. They found they had a knack for virtualization and came up with the software engine behind Parallels Desktop.

The company now has 75 employees, with more being added on a weekly basis, Rudolph said.

"We went from being a little tiny company to a little tiny company with a huge product," he said.

The company also has some venture funding, though Rudolph did not offer many specifics. "We definitely have enough money to keep the lights on for the next couple of years," he said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 203 Talkback(s)
Why run windows on Mac
Simple.
I'm a student, taking CompSci courses, a requriment for advanced
biology students. A requried CompSci courses is programing with
VBasic through Visual Studio. I either have to ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: nonextant Posted on: 08/14/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
So when do we get OS X and Windows on a real PC?  HypnoToad | 06/15/06
Not one of these overpriced Mac toys  mrlinux | 06/15/06
Mac don't even qualify as toy  Mectron | 06/15/06
How credible Mr. Troll - NT  raycote | 06/15/06
Macs are REAL PC'S!  netzd | 06/19/06
Mac vs Windows PC  bserrett@... | 06/15/06
Macs are a good PC but they cost more, no question  Cayble | 06/15/06
Don't forget to  timpin1@... | 06/16/06
your going the wrong way  doh123 | 06/16/06
Look, please, this isnt some kind of game  Cayble | 06/17/06
When you buy a Windows PC it's loaded with...  MacGeek2121 | 06/19/06
same features  ericblr | 06/20/06
Nothing to see here. Move along...  BitTwiddler | 06/15/06
Correction  zmud | 06/15/06
you missed a bit..  st!lborn | 06/15/06
Take apart guide  baggins_z | 06/15/06
wtf - dude  not of this world | 06/15/06
True but such is the fact that no one part not even the processor  Laff | 06/15/06
High Quality  m-nature | 06/15/06
Thermal paste error  bachware | 06/15/06
Except this issue happened on ...  ShadeTree | 06/15/06
not true  doh123 | 06/16/06
give me a hammer and a welding torch...  st!lborn | 06/15/06
Troll Alert  DarthRidiculous | 06/15/06
The irony of ignorance  slingzenarrowzuvowtrayjissforchin | 06/15/06
As one who has crashed and taken apart more than one Mac I say you're wrong  ajole | 06/15/06
Mac has had 3 great things for it  shryko | 06/15/06
Mac bashers are just afraid  cuberantcamper | 06/15/06
It does not cost alot for Avg  clockmendergb@... | 06/16/06
Toy?  thegestunkenaraygun | 06/15/06
Based on that  simbey1982 | 06/15/06
Based on your thoughts  thegestunkenaraygun | 06/15/06
Yet another Apple Fanboi heard from...  Wolfie2K3 | 06/15/06
No response required but...  thegestunkenaraygun | 06/15/06
Fanboi  ericblr | 06/20/06
This is the conparisons we need.  clockmendergb@... | 06/16/06
It'll never happen....  jgmsys@... | 06/19/06
Actually we use both Mac's and PC's where I work  Laff | 06/15/06
Are you saying Macs are cheaper in price ???  mrlinux | 06/15/06
I dont think so  ariepert | 06/15/06
Nope....  Laff | 06/15/06
KVM Switch  k@... | 06/15/06
Give iogear a look.....  Laff | 06/15/06
LinksKey  jefmud | 06/15/06
Except the vast majority of businesses ...  ShadeTree | 06/15/06
Perhaps....but in the end for me and mine that does not matter.  Laff | 06/16/06
Oh, they need the Macs, alright.  MTMacPhee | 06/19/06
Are you saying Macs are cheaper in price ???  machelpdesk | 06/15/06
HP and Dell are overpriced pieces of ...  swoopee | 06/15/06
Ok, get over the first tier crap too...  ajole | 06/15/06
And next week  timpin1@... | 06/16/06
Not with any $50-$100 Mainboard  ericblr | 06/22/06
I dont think so...  ericblr | 06/22/06
Wall Street Journals says Macs are cheaper  tic swayback | 06/15/06
Read the Fine Print  JoseTorr | 06/15/06
Continue the quote tic!!  NonZealot | 06/15/06
It is the closest equivalent though  tic swayback | 06/15/06
Me 2  schneb | 06/15/06
I like this idea  Shelendrea | 06/15/06
Yup that is why we are only purchasing one system for testing purposes.  Laff | 06/15/06
Still need two machines  francine@... | 06/15/06
You can...  fizzmaster | 06/15/06
better run Linux not windoze  Linux Geek | 06/15/06
Actually you can do em all I think....  Laff | 06/15/06
Parallels does Linux.  Doug K | 06/15/06
LOL @ U  Boot_Agnostic | 06/15/06
How come ?....'Yawn' this is so old !  applez | 06/15/06
You hear him Linux_Geek  Boot_Agnostic | 06/16/06
Why?  JulesLt | 06/16/06
Windows Licensing Issue  editcorp | 06/15/06
Ya might need  Linux User 147560 | 06/15/06
Wow, are you really that confused?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/15/06
You completely missed the sarcasm...  Linux User 147560 | 06/15/06
Is that what you were attempting?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/15/06
What is truly sad  Shelendrea | 06/15/06
No Ax, can you explain further  tic swayback | 06/15/06
Heh-heh  999ad@... | 06/15/06
Ok, Here's Microsoft's scoop  editcorp | 06/15/06
back-apps-wards.  shraven | 06/15/06
Is "bloated" a Maximum PC term or yours?  Laff | 06/15/06
Speed test  d_hawk | 06/15/06
Excellent question  timpin1@... | 06/16/06
Excellent question  timpin1@... | 06/16/06
Excellent question  timpin1@... | 06/16/06
Excellent question  NonZealot | 06/16/06
Why? Many answers....  Laff | 06/16/06
back-apps-wards  NoBias | 06/15/06
it's all well and good...  st!lborn | 06/15/06
What is so funny is that everyone wants Windows  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/15/06
Not quite  JulesLt | 06/15/06
You'd like to think that wouldn't you?  Shelendrea | 06/15/06
Seems like an awful lot of work!  NonZealot | 06/15/06
You MUST stop using common sense in the talkbacks!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/15/06
Oh Really?  Shelendrea | 06/15/06
So then, start coding...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/15/06
More automotive allegories, even more ignorance.  handydan918 | 06/15/06
Buzzzt wroing again...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/15/06
But you do  NonZealot | 06/15/06
I like your argument, but have a possible issue with it  ajole | 06/15/06
The ideal about keeping both OSX and her many applications  Laff | 06/16/06
What is REALLY silly:  dshealey_z | 06/16/06
Need I remind you  Sabz5150 | 06/15/06
You prove my point perfectly  NonZealot | 06/15/06
More F.U.D. ?  Rick_K | 06/18/06
Amen! oops, sorry, religion sneaked in there!  ajole | 06/15/06
Someone finally gets it!  GuidoMuldoon | 06/15/06
And to run the apps they NEED Windows.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/15/06
Knock Knock  Shelendrea | 06/15/06
Ah, why the need to insult?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/15/06
YOU of all people just asked me that?  Shelendrea | 06/15/06
Wow, what a slick dodge to a question.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/15/06
why thankyou  Shelendrea | 06/15/06
...like a hole in their head  Anthony Volpe | 06/15/06
All the Apps  JulesLt | 06/16/06
Ummm the two camps DON'T want to run  Jim Blaine - Bellingham WA. | 06/15/06
It's not emulation it's virtualization  GoPower | 06/15/06
misinformation  doh123 | 06/16/06
Tehy are avialable to all  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/15/06
Not everyone WANTS to run Windows...  MacCanuck | 06/15/06
You is funny!  NonZealot | 06/15/06
So "is" you...  MacCanuck | 06/15/06
YOURE FUNNY  theo_durcan | 06/15/06
broken link  theo_durcan | 06/15/06
Wow, good job with the links!!  NonZealot | 06/15/06
HISTORY & KARMA  theo_durcan | 06/15/06
I feel sorry for you  NonZealot | 06/16/06
Fer Christ's sake get a life! And a brain!  Sean_Ssss | 06/15/06
Perhaps you should try taking your own advice  MacCanuck | 06/15/06
So your complaint is...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/15/06
More along the lines of...  Spikey_Mike | 06/15/06
Ah I see, your IT guy is expert in the most widely  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/15/06
Preferred?  cuberantcamper | 06/15/06
You missed the point  paul.anderson@... | 06/15/06
Silly B-Trace users.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/15/06
You'll find it's D-Trace  JulesLt | 06/16/06
Mischaracterizations  tic swayback | 06/15/06
EVERYONE?  itanalyst | 06/15/06
nope wrong premise...  CMKRNL | 06/16/06
yeh, great tool, now...  st!lborn | 06/15/06
Mac and Windows  rgourlay@... | 06/15/06
No thanks happy  Kobashrer | 06/15/06
You Sir, deserve a royal caning for this double post!  st!lborn | 06/15/06
No thanks happy  Kobashrer | 06/15/06
You Sir, deserve a royal canign for thi sdouble post!  st!lborn | 06/15/06
Don't blame him  tic swayback | 06/15/06
Program Possibilities  TechStudent | 06/15/06
take the plunge  crazierthanu | 06/15/06
Explanation  JulesLt | 06/16/06
What about Windows Updates and virus threats?  salemomar@... | 06/15/06
Windows on a Mac...  handydan918 | 06/15/06
Yes and No  calvinsman-one@... | 06/20/06
RUN D:/ANNOYING.EXE  Anthony Volpe | 06/15/06
RUN D:/OBVIOUS.EXE  NonZealot | 06/15/06
LOL - Go Windows - It Created Qbasic  petemod | 06/19/06
Welcome to the same old discussion  simbey1982 | 06/15/06
Bottom line People  Shelendrea | 06/15/06
The real world  TonyMcS | 06/15/06
There are very good reasons to produce Mac code  calvinsman-one@... | 06/20/06
I predicted this is where Apple was headed when...  Linux_Fanboy | 06/15/06
Why can"t we all just get along?  cuberantcamper | 06/15/06
They don't cost more  SikosisZDNet | 06/15/06
Anything that makes computer easier is OK with me  fnash | 06/15/06
PCs arent as cheap ...  SikosisZDNet | 06/15/06
Granny  plumnilly | 06/16/06
You need to check too  fnash | 06/16/06
I'm have a MAC ATTACK  cuberantcamper | 06/15/06
The need is there......  suziew411@... | 06/15/06
Your decisions rule supreme over others  Boot_Agnostic | 06/16/06
Good move by Apple  tangent001 | 06/16/06
I agree 100%  NonZealot | 06/16/06
Demanding an OSX port? Are you kidding?  tangent001 | 06/16/06
We seem to already be there  NonZealot | 06/16/06
Yes, we are  Fred Fredrickson | 06/16/06
Windows users would probably turn up their nose at Mac-  IronCladChicken | 06/20/06
Most will  calvinsman-one@... | 06/20/06
Demanding an OSX port? Are you kidding?  IronCladChicken | 06/20/06
Your home combo is good  calvinsman-one@... | 06/20/06
It also gives people a chance to see...  Linux_Fanboy | 06/18/06
It Just Works  Steve@... | 06/16/06
But you are running Windows  NonZealot | 06/16/06
But Only When I Choose To!  Steve@... | 06/16/06
Why would you ever choose to use Windows?  NonZealot | 06/16/06
I agree  doh123 | 06/16/06
But Only When I Choose To!  Steve@... | 06/16/06
omitted from the story?  doh123 | 06/16/06
Sounds like it could be based on Xen  hawkeyeaz1 | 06/16/06
Fantastic!  Fred Fredrickson | 06/16/06
Fast, Rilly Fast, yada yada, like what else is BEN supposed to say?  Feldwebel Wolfenstool | 06/16/06
Win & Mac  Pheck | 06/18/06
Bravo! More choices, more fun!  calvinsman-one@... | 06/20/06
Why run Windows on Mac  john.burkert@... | 06/19/06
RE; Why run Windows on a Mac  deepsnow | 06/19/06
Agree and Don't  calvinsman-one@... | 06/20/06
Why run windows on Mac  nonextant | 08/14/06
copying data  kentfx_z | 06/19/06
Yes and No  calvinsman-one@... | 06/20/06
MAC costs much less overall - simple  Gene(ius):) | 06/19/06
Using MACs and MS-Ware for more than 20 years  IronCladChicken | 06/20/06
True that  Cosmo Kramer | 06/20/06
Depend on what you mean by "cost"  calvinsman-one@... | 06/20/06
Works as advertised  calvinsman-one@... | 06/20/06
True  calvinsman-one@... | 06/20/06
And meanwhile.....  Cosmo Kramer | 06/20/06

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here