On MovieTome: Megan Fox on TRANSFORMERS 2!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Declan McCullagh
Posted on ZDNet News: Apr 1, 2004 12:55:00 AM

A House of Representatives panel has approved a sweeping new copyright bill that would boost penalties for peer-to-peer piracy and increase federal police powers against Internet copyright infringement.

The House Judiciary intellectual property subcommittee voted for the "Piracy Deterrence and Education Act" (PDEA) late Wednesday, overruling objections from a minority of members that it would unreasonably expand the FBI's powers to demand private information from Internet service providers.

The PDEA--the result of intense lobbying from large copyright holders over the past six months--has emerged as a kind of grab-bag that combines other proposals introduced in the past but not approved. One section that first surfaced last year punishes an Internet user who makes available $1,000 in copyrighted materials with prison terms of up to three years and fines of up to $250,000. If the PDEA became law, prosecutors would not have to prove that $1,000 in copyrighted materials were downloaded--they would need only to show that those files had been publicly accessible in a shared folder.

One part of the PDEA that did not appear in earlier bills would require the FBI to "facilitate the sharing" of information among Internet providers, copyright holders and police.

"I am sure (that its sponsor) does not mean to expand the powers of the FBI," Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., said during the subcommittee hearing. "The concern I have is that this is very ambiguous. The language itself could lead an aggressive FBI to a different conclusion." Lofgren's attempt to amend the PDEA failed by a 4-14 vote.

Rep. Howard Berman, D-Calif., a PDEA supporter whose district abuts Hollywood, said that Lofgren's conclusions were unfounded. "They have been as passive as you can be," Berman said, referring to the FBI. "They have authority they don't exercise."

Although Congress has pressured the department to use the No Electronic Theft Act to jail file swappers, no such prosecutions have taken place so far. Earlier Wednesday, however, Attorney General John Ashcroft announced the creation of a task force on copyright violations.

The PDEA is an improved version of last year's legislation and will assist "federal law enforcement authorities in their efforts to investigate and prosecute intellectual property crimes," Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Tex., the subcommittee's chairman, said in his opening remarks. Smith said that the reworked version "clarifies and narrows the application of criminal copyright law to the worst P2P offenders."

Other sections of the PDEA would require Ashcroft to boost the number of antipiracy cops on the Justice Department's payroll, and order the U.S. Sentencing Commission to revisit prison term guidelines to make sure they reflect "the loss attributable to people broadly distributing copyrighted works over the Internet without authorization." The PDEA also combines parts of another of last year's proposals that bans unauthorized recording in movie theaters and includes harsh penalties if pre-release movies are swapped on peer-to-peer networks.

Gigi Sohn of Public Knowledge, a nonprofit group that agitates for fair use rights, said in a statement after Wednesday's vote that: "We hope the full Judiciary Committee will take a harder look at the change in the standard needed for prosecution of copyright infringement under this bill. The new standard created by the subcommittee could criminalize what is now lawful use of copyrighted materials."

At the same hearing, the House subcommittee also approved a bill that would increase criminal penalties for selling counterfeit labels that could go on CD-ROMs or software packages, and another bill to increase felony penalties for using false contact information when registering a domain name.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 134 Talkback(s)
Bring it on he he. Bring on the cententration camps martial law and execut
I share everything I download. I give back. I'm not a leech. Nothing short of internet martial law and mass concentration camps and executions will stop P2P. Especially with EMule and it's modders... (Read the rest)
Posted by: GreatInca Posted on: 10/13/04 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
File sharing legal in Canada cybershoplifter   | 04/01/04
And they're giving it away pretty soon here... TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
Don't like this, blame yourself if you swap. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
Cyber Shoplifter claimed I was wrong, I didn't have clue cybershoplifter   | 04/01/04
I blame them all buxxmaster   | 04/01/04
Punishment rises to meet the requirement. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
but that's part of what I am saying buxxmaster   | 04/01/04
Good choice, bad choice, doesn't matter. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
Yup buxxmaster   | 04/01/04
That's the real issue: Bad Business Choices TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
But no one is being punished! tic swayback   | 04/01/04
Does it bother anyone...? TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
it's notthe punishment that was the problem.. ryusen   | 04/01/04
That's part of what I am saying buxxmaster   | 04/01/04
the problem with that... ryusen   | 04/01/04
Sad isn't it? buxxmaster   | 04/01/04
ATM; ryusen   | 04/01/04
And when it gets to a certain point... TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
I'm all for a Boston CD party buxxmaster   | 04/01/04
Why new laws? tic swayback   | 04/01/04
File swapping is a red herring for power grab oldskool   | 04/01/04
Since all the file sharing apps in question run on Windows... B.O.F.H.   | 04/01/04
Problem: only 30 million swappers a day. Anton Philidor   | 04/01/04
As the OWNER, that is their choice. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
Thank you, King Canute. Anton Philidor   | 04/01/04
I could not care less. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
"I don't have a clue" No_Ax_to_Grind cybershoplifter   | 04/01/04
The truth of the matter... Stewart Cannon   | 04/01/04
"steal copyrighted material" cybershoplifter   | 04/01/04
His ilk will never "get it" TexasBBQ No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
His "ilk" includes the Supreme Court tic swayback   | 04/01/04
The only way to "steal" copyrighted material TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
Being right doesn't exonerate, but it helps Anton Philidor   | 04/01/04
Have any minor punishments worked in th epast? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
Draco and the threat of used clothing Anton Philidor   | 04/01/04
Good idea AX bchesmer   | 04/01/04
Major penalties don't work, either TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
there you go again... ryusen   | 04/01/04
Sure I care, but it's not an excuse. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
where in that post did i say it was an excuse? ryusen   | 04/01/04
You should care TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
King Canute, I like it, I like it! cybershoplifter   | 04/01/04
Quick note on Canute: a correction Anton Philidor   | 04/01/04
"I don't have a clue" No_Ax_to_Grind cybershoplifter   | 04/01/04
OWNER of what? myndlon@...   | 04/01/04
Fortunately for every content owner, you're wrong. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
We need more little Hitler's don't we? cybershoplifter   | 04/01/04
'tis true myndlon@...   | 04/01/04
unless you are the mayor of San Francisco buxxmaster   | 04/01/04
I AGREE!!! No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
The founding fathers had it right buxxmaster   | 04/01/04
Buxx, I would take it further. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
Not a bad idea at all buxxmaster   | 04/01/04
I wish you'd read them too tic swayback   | 04/01/04
or... ryusen   | 04/01/04
Obey, H=LL! TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
Well buxxmaster   | 04/01/04
As the OWNER, that is their choice. seosamh_z   | 04/01/04
Consumers have made their choice tic swayback   | 04/01/04
Consumers have only one legal choice. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
Two separate issues tic swayback   | 04/01/04
they won't buxxmaster   | 04/01/04
Only way to tell is stop the theft. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
Maybe, but buxxmaster   | 04/01/04
Can't stop what doesn't exist tic swayback   | 04/01/04
Only physical property, Bit TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
Gee, maybe you need to read the new laws. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
Been there, done that! TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
Well Bit Tim Patterson   | 09/28/04
As the owner, they apparently can also, ryusen   | 04/01/04
Bit loves "the letter of the law" TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
A historian your not. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
Shows what you know... TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
Really??? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
To answer No_Ax (annoyed at Talkback limits here) TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
perhaps... ryusen   | 04/01/04
??? TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
re: Diva ryusen   | 04/02/04
New laws only make.... KOS-MOS   | 04/01/04
I hope you get your wish. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
And I hope you can afford it TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
WTF??? John E Wahd   | 04/01/04
Only if you break the law Sue. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
You do if.... John E Wahd   | 04/01/04
Your either confused or being obtuse. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
All you are is a snotty brat! cybershoplifter   | 04/01/04
Your ?? grind_that_axe   | 04/01/04
Her point??? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
By the way, I love the flattery. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
Now see..... John E Wahd   | 04/01/04
Wasn't meant as an insult. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
Sure sounded like one! cybershoplifter   | 04/01/04
if they weren't meant to be insults, ryusen   | 04/01/04
She NEVER said she didn't understand TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
By the way, are you saying... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
This is how the public feels! cybershoplifter   | 04/01/04
So which is it Sue? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
Why yes, yes I am. John E Wahd   | 04/01/04
Sue: Why yes I am.... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
No. John E Wahd   | 04/01/04
Sue: Why yes I am.... myndlon@...   | 04/01/04
Sue: Are you talking about MADD? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
MADD? Please, there is no comparison there. John E Wahd   | 04/01/04
Sue: As I said, only when YOU agree is it good. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
Well, yeah...... John E Wahd   | 04/01/04
You're both! TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
Sorry, read it again. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
I did read it TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
You still don't get it, do you, Bit? TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
YOU don't "get it". No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
Hearsay TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
No further replies to this post will be accepted. cybershoplifter   | 04/01/04
(NT) That's just the "7 levels in a thread" limit kicking in John E Wahd   | 04/01/04
didn't know that. thanks! cybershoplifter   | 04/01/04
In other words, don't underestimate stupidity. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
(NT) LOL. John E Wahd   | 04/01/04
"7 levels in a thread" TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
bittie thinks it's great! cybershoplifter   | 04/01/04
On that we agree. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/01/04
So now using network file server is illegal oldskool   | 04/01/04
don't have to - already there by default V Sanders   | 04/01/04
Bad week for the RIAA tic swayback   | 04/01/04
i wonder how much that cost.... ryusen   | 04/01/04
not to mention V Sanders   | 04/01/04
i think P2P is more pervasive than just children... ryusen   | 04/02/04
FBI has powers they don't exercise???? TechDiva_z   | 04/01/04
NAtG: only when YOU agree is it good. myndlon@...   | 04/01/04
I'll just download my stuff from Canada! Xunil_Sierutuf   | 04/01/04
from what I read downloading is not what concerns them V Sanders   | 04/01/04
that's the point... ryusen   | 04/02/04
Owners rights and responsibilities myndlon@...   | 04/01/04
better make sure pc secure V Sanders   | 04/01/04
this one is sneaking up on us V Sanders   | 04/01/04
Bring it on he he. Bring on the cententration camps martial law and execut GreatInca   | 10/13/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement