On CBS.com: HD may burn your eyes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Martin LaMonica, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Oct 5, 2004 9:09:00 PM

Network services giant AT&T is evaluating different operating systems, including Linux and Mac OS X, as alternatives to Windows for internal use.

The company's chief information officer, Hossein Eslambolchi, has set up a team in AT&T's research labs to assess the appropriateness of desktop operating systems for the company, AT&T spokesman Michael Dickman said Thursday. The company currently uses Windows on its desktop PCs, which number in the tens of thousands.

The engineers are testing and measuring how Windows, Linux and Mac OS X stack up on security, reliability and total cost of ownership, Dickman said. The CIO is also the company's chief technology officer and is responsible for AT&T's research and development.

AT&T expects to make a decision on the merits of the desktop operating systems by the end of next year or early 2006.

Most likely, AT&T will stick with Windows, because Microsoft is addressing many of problems associated with its desktop software, including security flaws that leave it particularly vulnerable to viruses, Dickman said. But increasingly, corporate customers have more choices for desktop software, he noted.

"There's competition; there's choice now," Dickman said. "Any CIO would not be doing due diligence if they are not looking at their options now."

AT&T is not actively seeking to replace Windows, Dickman said. But the company's decision to thoroughly evaluate Mac OS X and Linux, along with Windows, for widespread corporate use underscores the improvements in Windows alternatives.

Linux, in particular, has become a more viable option for a desktop operating system, according to analysts. Vendors such as Novell and Sun Microsystems are actively trying to build open-source desktop software businesses catering to corporations.

Use of Linux on desktops is minimal in business right now, according to analysts, but there is growing interest in it. IBM earlier this year launched its own internal project to evaluate Linux for desktop computers. Also, a number of governmental organizations are pursuing open-source options to Microsoft dominance in desktop software.

Researchers at The Yankee Group last month published a report predicting that small businesses will drive adoption of Linux on desktops. In a survey, they found that 4 percent to 10 percent of small companies expect to have Linux PCs one year from now.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 86 Talkback(s)
AT&T could be floating this to get a break from MS
I used to work for AT&T, and I would not put it past them to be floating this as a rumour to get a break from Microsoft.

MS apps are so much a part of corporate life at AT&T, I really d... (Read the rest)
Posted by: robmill Posted on: 10/07/04 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Interesting..... Kamakazii   | 10/05/04
Re: Interesting alterego_z   | 10/05/04
windows NV (no virii)? Richard Flude   | 10/05/04
no training is needed for a OS V Sanders   | 10/06/04
Must have been setup well.. d_jedi   | 10/06/04
.. a few other quibbles.. d_jedi   | 10/06/04
I'm sure AT&T will take these into consideration. Laff   | 10/06/04
Re: AT d_jedi   | 10/06/04
Uh... yes it does. Linux User 147560   | 10/06/04
Does it? d_jedi   | 10/06/04
Then change it... Linux User 147560   | 10/06/04
Well like in your previous posts and response to me Laff   | 10/06/04
Thank you, Linux user.. d_jedi   | 10/06/04
No problem! Linux User 147560   | 10/06/04
Oops.. d_jedi   | 10/06/04
OK...let's rehash. Cardinal_Bill   | 10/06/04
re: OK...let's rehash. d_jedi   | 10/06/04
re:interesting ickusslime@...   | 10/05/04
Retraining, Retraining!! They don't need no stinkin' Retrainin' ! el1jones   | 10/05/04
MS didn't copy Mac StorageGuru   | 10/06/04
Right Click mrlinux   | 10/06/04
MS DID Copy the Mac Interface jacarter3   | 10/06/04
Your kidding, right? el1jones   | 10/06/04
Why stay with the limited capabilities of VBScript? Linux User 147560   | 10/06/04
Correct! Zooomy   | 10/06/04
They have to "retrain" anyway IT_User   | 10/05/04
Evan "IF" what you say is true...Isn't the benefits of Laff   | 10/06/04
Not too big of a story. doe_z   | 10/05/04
Gee AT&T spokesman appears at odds with the comments of the CIO Richard Flude   | 10/05/04
The quote about not having to switch was from the CIO... Anton Philidor   | 10/06/04
Faint hope StorageGuru   | 10/06/04
Wow you're right;-) Richard Flude   | 10/06/04
No matter how one trys to SPIN this it is big Laff   | 10/06/04
Lets not forget. doe_z   | 10/06/04
It does seem that the people that should know about Laff   | 10/06/04
Can't sue AT&T over System V infringement StorageGuru   | 10/06/04
Agreed, diversifying is key to security. NT dave95   | 10/06/04
Can you elaborate on this please? seosamh_z   | 10/06/04
hmmm, it only seems natural dave95   | 10/06/04
companies like this want to install bare bones pc's with only apps agents V Sanders   | 10/06/04
Mac costs Roger Ramjet   | 10/06/04
Here I think... doe_z   | 10/06/04
TCOO sjohns14@...   | 10/06/04
and? doh123   | 10/06/04
Mass adoption supoman   | 10/06/04
Clue 1 - Corps don't buy $499 specials ITGuy04   | 10/06/04
Wasn't the cost of hardware that drove us to PCs YuridaMan   | 10/06/04
Hardware cost essentially a wash markdoc.geo   | 10/07/04
Does it really cost as much? emiliosic@...   | 10/07/04
This Is Only The Beginning..... itanalyst   | 10/06/04
First we get the power! Then we get the WOMEN!!! Laff   | 10/06/04
Now that's an inspiring headline. Anton Philidor   | 10/06/04
You would think . . . Roger Ramjet   | 10/06/04
Selective targeting Anton Philidor   | 10/06/04
I don't know Anton....Perhaps you are introducting Laff   | 10/06/04
Bet you weren't discussing O-S-X Anton Philidor   | 10/06/04
Personally I think generalizations always fail Laff   | 10/06/04
could care less dlevesqu   | 10/06/04
AT&T is extremely myopic, the future lies consolidated HypnoToad   | 10/06/04
Only time will tell this tale.......:) Laff   | 10/06/04
Switching is no idle threat Chad_z   | 10/06/04
I wonder if the EU commision can read? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 10/06/04
I'll be blunt Darkintent   | 10/06/04
So will I. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 10/06/04
It's curious... jacarter3   | 10/06/04
I see your mistake... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 10/06/04
Wrong again Fred Fredrickson   | 10/06/04
Who's fault is that? seosamh_z   | 10/06/04
What fault? jacarter3   | 10/07/04
Not statistically relevant! B.O.F.H.   | 10/06/04
Don't tell me, tell Munich. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 10/06/04
15,000 desktops will not change the statistic much! B.O.F.H.   | 10/06/04
And here you made such a big deal about it... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 10/06/04
No such claim was made! B.O.F.H.   | 10/06/04
Yes but... seosamh_z   | 10/06/04
Ah but the point is... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 10/06/04
However... John L. Ries   | 10/06/04
I wonder if you can think? Fred Fredrickson   | 10/06/04
Simply put michael-t   | 10/06/04
Well not exactly. Cardinal_Bill   | 10/06/04
Irony PMDubuc   | 10/06/04
Actually no. seosamh_z   | 10/06/04
Re: Actually no. PMDubuc   | 10/07/04
Makes sense John L. Ries   | 10/06/04
It's OK ... michael-t   | 10/06/04
AT&T could be floating this to get a break from MS robmill   | 10/07/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
Click Here