On CBS Sports: Latest fantasy football player rankings
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ina Fried, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Jun 14, 2005 4:18:00 PM

Use of Microsoft Windows XP has grown inside corporations, but a new study shows that nearly half of business PCs are still running the older Windows 2000.

The study, released Tuesday by AssetMetrix, underscores a recurring problem for Microsoft: While the company spends billions of dollars developing new versions of Windows and its Office desktop software, many customers are slow to give up older versions of software that's paid for and works just fine.

The AssetMetrix study shows that many companies have moved off of other versions of Windows, including Windows NT 4, Windows 95 and Windows 98.

Windows XP use surged to 38 percent by the first quarter of this year, up from 6.6 percent in the third quarter of 2003. However, the popularity of Windows 2000 has remained high, with the venerable operating system still in use in 48 percent of business PCs during the first quarter of 2005, down just four percentage points from the third quarter of 2003.

"I think (Windows 2000) worked too well."
--Steve O'Halloran,
managing director,
AssetMetrix
"The findings of this study suggest that Windows 2000 still plays an important part in many IT environments," Steve O'Halloran, managing director of Ottawa-based AssetMetrix's research division, said in a report.

And, if anything, analysts say that customer reticence in upgrading has increased in recent years.

"It seems to be taking longer each time" for customers to upgrade, said Michael Cherry, an analyst at Directions on Microsoft.

The sustained use of Windows 2000 is particularly significant as Microsoft prepares to end mainstream support for it at the end of this month. The company will still patch any important security flaws, but most other updating of the OS will cease. Support calls on nonsecurity matters will also be handled only on a paid basis.

Microsoft is preparing one final update to Windows 2000. The software maker opted last year to forgo a full service pack and is instead releasing what it dubs an Update Rollup, a lesser collection of security patches and updates issued since the release of Service Pack 4 in June 2003.

The company has said to expect the Update Rollup by midyear but has not said what features will be included beyond already released patches and updates. By not releasing a more full-featured service pack, Microsoft may be trying to send a signal that customers need to upgrade to get new features.

"I think Microsoft would obviously prefer they were running Windows XP, in part because Microsoft has invested so much to improve the security of XP with Service Pack 2," Cherry said.

For Microsoft, the fact that customers hang on to older versions of its software has become a chronic bugaboo. To some degree, the sluggish upgrade pace affects the company's revenue. In many cases, however, customers have already paid for a license to newer versions.

More significantly, Microsoft believes that when customers stick with older software, their satisfaction level is lower than it might otherwise be--a situation that could ultimately lead to lost sales.

In addition, the situation threatens to undermine the vast sums that Microsoft is spending to increase security in its most recent versions of Windows: Windows XP and Windows Server 2003.

There are several reasons for customers' foot-dragging. Many companies aren't getting rid of their older PCs running Windows 2000. Instead, when new XP-based machines are purchased, businesses are passing on the Windows 2000 machines to workers lower in the pecking order, O'Halloran said.

Windows 2000 is, in some ways, also a victim of its own success.

"When Windows 2000 came out, it was fantastic blend of security and user interface," O'Halloran said. As a result, companies planned their whole infrastructure around it. Many of its management tools have continued to be updated, leaving companies relatively satisfied.

"I think it worked too well," he said.

O'Halloran does expect that the percentage of Windows 2000 machines will drop further now that companies have largely gotten rid of all their Windows 95, Windows 98 and Windows NT 4 machines. Still, O'Halloran predicts that the decline will be a gradual one rather than a large exodus spurred by the June 30 change in support status.

"I don't see anyone having a knee-jerk reaction," he said.

In some cases, Cherry said businesses may decide they want to wait for Longhorn, the new version of Windows due out in the second half of next year. But that transition--if and when companies decide to make the move--could be a far more dramatic one than the move from Windows 2000 to XP. O'Halloran said that most companies won't see a big shift if they move to XP. Windows XP is really just a bulked-up version of Windows 2000.

"It's an SUV versus a minivan," he said. "They both can get you there. It's the same type of vehicle. You still understand how to drive it."

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 421 Talkback(s)
The slow road to WindowsXP
I have not seen much comment here about the glugginess of the OS... MS get your act together and
RE-COMPILE THE PRESENT SYSTEM to include ONLY new code. My customers will see a Simpler (Version 3 ?... (Read the rest)
Posted by: chime_8@... Posted on: 07/05/05 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Windows XP a new OS? bidemytime   | 06/14/05
Same old thing markg4269   | 06/14/05
A new thing! LLLActive   | 06/15/05
Try not being stuck with them ebrke   | 06/15/05
New OS? roo_z   | 06/14/05
lmao IT Scion   | 06/14/05
I would put Win2000 over XP in a NY minute! Laff   | 06/15/05
Jim, the funny part IT Scion   | 06/15/05
I tend to think the point is that they bought the Laff   | 06/15/05
But IT Scion   | 06/15/05
Not logical, captain...roo rock06r   | 06/17/05
X Pee! An_Axe_to_Grind   | 06/14/05
X.org linuxoverwindows   | 06/14/05
w00t? What is this w00t? Hmmm... Colonel_Panic   | 06/14/05
Check Wikipedia (NT) jbx233   | 06/15/05
Thanks >;-] (nt) Colonel_Panic   | 06/15/05
wOOt! StyleAndEntertainment   | 06/24/05
Ok, then run 2000 rock06r   | 06/17/05
Obviously, many of us do cdgoldin   | 06/17/05
And why did it sell at all?? Bundled with new PC..! Xunil_Sierutuf   | 06/14/05
Why did it sell at all? CodeBubba   | 06/14/05
Yea IT Scion   | 06/14/05
Slow scale, right balance tony49mcp   | 06/14/05
For me IT Scion   | 06/14/05
Getting better is not good enough aramael   | 06/14/05
Getting Better... Wolfie2K3   | 06/14/05
A matter of degree mds_z   | 06/14/05
RE: Getting better is not good enough nightshade0143   | 06/14/05
Aren't you angry? aramael   | 06/14/05
No flames, it's good to see one person actually bought it. Xunil_Sierutuf   | 06/14/05
That's the highest compliment you could give. PA-ITGuy   | 06/14/05
Bummer, Dude! WarHippy   | 06/14/05
Somebody Convert WarHippy to Linux, Please (NT) PMC-CON   | 06/14/05
Who? Me?? WarHippy   | 06/14/05
Yes... Colonel_Panic   | 06/14/05
Software development? rbentley@...   | 06/15/05
totally agree HelpDesk Dave   | 06/15/05
why? rbentley@...   | 06/15/05
HERE is a difference with Linux Henaway   | 06/15/05
Here Microsoft could learn from Linux ajv123   | 06/16/05
Sure, and Mac pOS Crestview   | 06/15/05
You know these forums really need some work! Linux User 147560   | 06/14/05
Hate much IT Scion   | 06/14/05
I know enough Linux User 147560   | 06/14/05
Let's not be so passionate... vashthestampede   | 06/14/05
And now for a lesson in reading comprehension! Linux User 147560   | 06/14/05
Same here FoxFord   | 06/14/05
Don't need the lesson but thanks IT Scion   | 06/14/05
You sound like... Colonel_Panic   | 06/14/05
Myh point was pretty clear IT Scion   | 06/14/05
Yeah yeah, blah blah, I get it but... Colonel_Panic   | 06/15/05
Smashing the computer HiRezL   | 06/15/05
Re: Smashing the computer Colonel_Panic   | 06/15/05
Strange, people that work with Windohs alot... Colonel_Panic   | 06/14/05
Is that you with another handle Mepis? osreinstall   | 06/15/05
I didn't know you... Colonel_Panic   | 06/15/05
That is sad osreinstall   | 06/15/05
Protect what with what? Huh?... Colonel_Panic   | 06/15/05
Well the handle is quite honest osreinstall   | 06/15/05
Re: Well the handle... Colonel_Panic   | 06/15/05
Maybe a little of both osreinstall   | 06/15/05
Hey reinschtall, click enclosed link... Colonel_Panic   | 06/15/05
I already found it osreinstall   | 06/15/05
Not necessarily shawkins   | 06/14/05
"just another . . . fanboy" brian ansorge   | 06/15/05
Love vs. Hate 2cool_z   | 06/14/05
Really Needs Work Ruko   | 06/14/05
LOL @ XP = "more efficient virus magnet" (nt) Colonel_Panic   | 06/14/05
Take a step back to W2K or discover a new world :: Linux :: LLLActive   | 06/15/05
Microsofts problems ajv123   | 06/16/05
Fantastic security? zztong   | 06/14/05
Dig deap ibabadur1   | 06/14/05
Re: fantastic security alterego_z   | 06/14/05
Antivirus/AntiSpyware companies brian ansorge   | 06/15/05
It's not revisionism, it's the truth.....literally! cicuta   | 06/14/05
revisionist history linuxoverwindows   | 06/14/05
I So Look Forward To Microsoft Sucks Tuesday itanalyst   | 06/14/05
More like "Billy Hung the Kid".. Xunil_Sierutuf   | 06/14/05
BOTH of you are funny, lmao. (nt) Colonel_Panic   | 06/14/05
"hanged," actually . . . brian ansorge   | 06/15/05
Does Activaion Hurt? Hotshot_z   | 06/15/05
Thats one of the reasons I don,t use XP wexwimpy@...   | 06/15/05
You are kidding right? Did somebody... Colonel_Panic   | 06/15/05
Activation is an invation of privacy ajv123   | 06/16/05
The slow road to Windows XP Loverock Davidson   | 06/14/05
Agreed PA-ITGuy   | 06/14/05
The next problem for Microsoft will be the hardware required for Longhorn. DonnieBoy   | 06/14/05
That would imply Loverock Davidson   | 06/14/05
I tend to disagree FreeBSD   | 06/14/05
Well.. regloff@...   | 06/14/05
Thats what I'm saying Loverock Davidson   | 06/14/05
Good post and... Colonel_Panic   | 06/15/05
But, you are in control, and resource needed for Longhorn are out of sight. DonnieBoy   | 06/14/05
Corporate Responsibility PMC-CON   | 06/14/05
RE:
That would imply
 nightshade0143   | 06/14/05
The Big Lie hulse_kevin   | 06/15/05
That makes the assumption... PA-ITGuy   | 06/14/05
But for support reasons, they probably downgrade new hardware to XP. DonnieBoy   | 06/14/05
And so once again PA-ITGuy   | 06/14/05
And Your Assumption Makes the Assumption WarHippy   | 06/14/05
I suspected as much ajv123   | 06/16/05
But than, XP-SP2 Runs a whole lot better ajv123   | 07/02/05
Fair Assumption Richard Flude   | 06/14/05
Read everything on that link PA-ITGuy   | 06/14/05
As long as you don't use the minimum Occupant82   | 06/14/05
No Cost Savings for Linux dcreed   | 06/14/05
RE: No Cost Savings for Linux DrBrianM   | 06/14/05
Red herrings galore! Linux User 147560   | 06/14/05
wine linuxoverwindows   | 06/14/05
Thanks for the cedega Linux User 147560   | 06/14/05
My employer spent $2.96M fmcgowan   | 06/14/05
*applaud* linuxoverwindows   | 06/14/05
RE: No Cost Savings for Linux nightshade0143   | 06/14/05
yawl crack me up linuxoverwindows   | 06/14/05
Linux upgrades all the time! Andrej.G.   | 06/15/05
That is still Linux Achilles heel ajv123   | 06/16/05
Yea most of my customers need IT Scion   | 06/14/05
very well... linuxoverwindows   | 06/14/05
Sorry IT Scion   | 06/14/05
well, opinions are like... linuxoverwindows   | 06/14/05
To Win2000 users, don't upgrade to XP, upgrade to Firefox, Thunderbird, DonnieBoy   | 06/14/05
Beat you to it osreinstall   | 06/15/05
It's simple economics. JonathonDoe   | 06/14/05
XP just breaks 2K security. palmwarrior   | 06/14/05
Combine Code Base of NT and DOS PMC-CON   | 06/14/05
Fewer and fewer reasons to upgrade ... George Mitchell   | 06/14/05
No reason to upgrade since NT4 uno@...   | 06/14/05
Most of us are just using office. Arrg   | 06/14/05
No reason other than ... umm ... ac2_z   | 06/14/05
99% of us use very basic office, AND OpenOffice is free. DonnieBoy   | 06/14/05
XP is actually more stable immrlizard   | 06/14/05
Better Option IceTheNet@...   | 06/14/05
Better for who? IT Scion   | 06/14/05
Uh first off Linux User 147560   | 06/14/05
Actually IT Scion   | 06/14/05
Now we know the reason! cdgoldin   | 06/15/05
Funny IT Scion   | 06/15/05
Thanks IT Scion   | 06/14/05
Get real... Wolfie2K3   | 06/14/05
Danger! Stereotype Alert!! Danger! fmcgowan   | 06/14/05
LOL PA-ITGuy   | 06/15/05
OK; ya got me... kinda fmcgowan   | 06/15/05
What support? cdgoldin   | 06/15/05
I've never had a stability problem with win2k. Arrg   | 06/14/05
more stable than what? linuxoverwindows   | 06/14/05
yeah, and my Novell Netware 3.12 server was last rebooted 2 years ago... Googey10   | 06/15/05
Yep --- XP is Very Robust with New Hardware PMC-CON   | 06/14/05
Heck, we're still happy using Redfrat 6 and Socaris 8 Boot_Agnostic   | 06/14/05
Product Activation p*ssed off a lot of businesses alterego_z   | 06/14/05
D.N.A. to corporate, which is all Microsoft cares about anyway.... shawkins   | 06/14/05
License Agreement Zolar   | 06/14/05
Hah billwaib   | 06/15/05
Microsoft activation. Captain-Video   | 06/14/05
A hassle to what? Delmont   | 06/14/05
heh M_c   | 06/14/05
Activation is no problem as long as your legal ajv123   | 07/02/05
Already happen to me with Outlook Argonnj   | 06/14/05
Sounds more like a user issue to me Delmont   | 06/14/05
Is Your IQ two or Three digits?? WarHippy   | 06/14/05
Yes it is their right. Delmont   | 06/14/05
MS has their rights, so do I... just curious   | 06/14/05
So..... Delmont   | 06/14/05
Go Get a Job Yourself, I'm Retired WarHippy   | 06/14/05
And the black helicopters circle above Delmont   | 06/14/05
More koolaid please Argonnj   | 06/15/05
a user issue Clp727   | 06/15/05
I love it wexwimpy@...   | 06/17/05
re: Product Activation p*ssed off a lot of businesses Wolfie2K3   | 06/14/05
RE: re: Product Activation p*ssed off a lot of businesses nightshade0143   | 06/14/05
Product Activation Code robert.carraher@...   | 06/14/05
again, what activation codes? Delmont   | 06/14/05
You Mean...........YER CHEATING???? WarHippy   | 06/14/05
It's called downgrade PA-ITGuy   | 06/15/05