On CBS.com: Women talk about undressing
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ina Fried, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Jun 15, 2006 4:00:00 AM

Parallels, a start-up whose software enables Macs to run Microsoft Windows and the Mac OS at the same time, says it is ready with a final version of its product.

Apple Computer made headlines back in April when it said it would offer its own software--Boot Camp--for loading Windows onto Macs. However, Boot Camp permits people to run only one operating system at a time, meaning either Windows or the Mac OS can be in use, but not both at once.

Around the same time, Parallels started testing for its Parallels Desktop program, which uses virtualization technology to have Windows programs operate alongside Mac applications. The Windows programs open in a separate window within the Mac OS.

Unlike past software that allowed Windows programs to run on a Mac, Parallels Desktop does not need to emulate the hardware that's inside a PC. That's because Macs and PCs now use the same Intel-based chips. As a result, the speed of Parallels is far better than past efforts at bringing together the two operating systems, the software start-up said. In fact, Parallels says Windows programs can run nearly as fast through its virtualization as running natively on a Windows PC.

"The difference in performance between Parallels and Boot Camp is negligible," said Parallels marketing manager Ben Rudolph. "Things move very, very fast."

Being able to run Windows programs is seen as a potentially significant catalyst for Mac sales. Needham analyst Charlie Wolf upgraded Apple's stock on Tuesday, saying that the combination of Boot Camp and programs like Parallels could help the Cupertino, Calif.-based company gain market share.

"The trigger for our upgrade is the prospect that a significant number of Windows users will switch to a Mac once it's able to run Windows applications," Wolf wrote in a report. He cited a survey by his firm, which found that in the U.S., some 8 percent of home PC owners would switch to a Mac if it could run Windows. "An increase of this magnitude would almost triple Apple's share in the home market and increase it 75 percent worldwide," Wolf wrote.

Put through its paces
The Parallels software has been in testing since April, and more than 100,000 people have tried it out, according to the company. Interest has come not only from hobbyists eager to try out Microsoft's operating system on their Mac at home, but also from governments, businesses and schools that want to have their Macs better able to converse in a Windows-dominated world.

Parallels Windows on Mac

Canada's University of Waterloo, for example, has been testing Parallels software. It plans to use it in the Mac lab of its environmental studies department so students can benefit from a number of programs that aren't available for Apple machines.

"I've been very impressed with the performance of it," said Don Duff-McCracken, a graphics and computer-aided design systems manager at the university. Duff-McCracken said he has been using the Parallels tool to run processor-intensive software, such as the World Construction Set software for rendering terrain.

Duff-McCracken compared applications in Parallels with the same ones running directly in Windows via Boot Camp. The performance in Parallels was within 1 to 2 percent of the other, he said. And both Mac-based options were faster than some recently acquired Dell machines the school had.

"It's running this sophisticated software at native speeds," he said.

While Boot Camp is essentially a tool for letting a Mac run either Windows or the Mac OS, Parallels makes both operating systems available at the same time. To do this, Windows runs as what is known as a virtual machine--essentially acting as if it was a separate PC.

Boot Camp, meanwhile, is still in beta, though Apple has said it will be part of Leopard, the next version of Mac OS X. The company is expected to outline Leopard's key features at a developer conference in August.

Parallels plans to eventually charge $79 for its software, though it is selling it for $49 for the next 30 days. It has been offering it for $10 less than that for beta testers who pre-ordered the final version.

A potential challenge for the start-up is that Apple may decide to offer, in addition to Boot Camp, a feature that acts more like Parallels in allowing Windows programs to run within the Mac OS. There has been speculation that Leopard might have such abilities.

Rudolph said Parallels can't spend its time worrying about what others might do.

"All we do is virtualization," he said. "Apple has got hundreds of different products. I believe we are going to have a faster, better solution regardless of what happens."

Herndon, Va.-based Parallels got its start when its two founders were doing freelance help-desk work. They found they had a knack for virtualization and came up with the software engine behind Parallels Desktop.

The company now has 75 employees, with more being added on a weekly basis, Rudolph said.

"We went from being a little tiny company to a little tiny company with a huge product," he said.

The company also has some venture funding, though Rudolph did not offer many specifics. "We definitely have enough money to keep the lights on for the next couple of years," he said.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 203 Talkback(s)
Why run windows on Mac
Simple.
I'm a student, taking CompSci courses, a requriment for advanced
biology students. A requried CompSci courses is programing with
VBasic through Visual Studio. I either have to ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: nonextant Posted on: 08/14/06 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
So when do we get OS X and Windows on a real PC? HypnoToad   | 06/15/06
Not one of these overpriced Mac toys mrlinux   | 06/15/06
Mac don't even qualify as toy Mectron   | 06/15/06
How credible Mr. Troll - NT raycote   | 06/15/06
Macs are REAL PC'S! netzd   | 06/19/06
Mac vs Windows PC bserrett@...   | 06/15/06
Macs are a good PC but they cost more, no question Cayble   | 06/15/06
Don't forget to timpin1@...   | 06/16/06
your going the wrong way doh123   | 06/16/06
Look, please, this isnt some kind of game Cayble   | 06/17/06
When you buy a Windows PC it's loaded with... MacGeek2121   | 06/19/06
same features ericblr   | 06/20/06
Nothing to see here. Move along... BitTwiddler   | 06/15/06
Correction zmud   | 06/15/06
you missed a bit.. st!lborn   | 06/15/06
Take apart guide baggins_z   | 06/15/06
wtf - dude not of this world   | 06/15/06
True but such is the fact that no one part not even the processor Laff   | 06/15/06
High Quality m-nature   | 06/15/06
Thermal paste error bachware   | 06/15/06
Except this issue happened on ... ShadeTree   | 06/15/06
not true doh123   | 06/16/06
give me a hammer and a welding torch... st!lborn   | 06/15/06
Troll Alert DarthRidiculous   | 06/15/06
The irony of ignorance slingzenarrowzuvowtrayjissforchin   | 06/15/06
As one who has crashed and taken apart more than one Mac I say you're wrong ajole   | 06/15/06
Mac has had 3 great things for it shryko   | 06/15/06
Mac bashers are just afraid cuberantcamper   | 06/15/06
It does not cost alot for Avg clockmendergb@...   | 06/16/06
Toy? thegestunkenaraygun   | 06/15/06
Based on that simbey1982   | 06/15/06
Based on your thoughts thegestunkenaraygun   | 06/15/06
Yet another Apple Fanboi heard from... Wolfie2K3   | 06/15/06
No response required but... thegestunkenaraygun   | 06/15/06
Fanboi ericblr   | 06/20/06
This is the conparisons we need. clockmendergb@...   | 06/16/06
It'll never happen.... jgmsys@...   | 06/19/06
Actually we use both Mac's and PC's where I work Laff   | 06/15/06
Are you saying Macs are cheaper in price ??? mrlinux   | 06/15/06
I dont think so ariepert   | 06/15/06
Nope.... Laff   | 06/15/06
KVM Switch k@...   | 06/15/06
Give iogear a look..... Laff   | 06/15/06
LinksKey jefmud   | 06/15/06
Except the vast majority of businesses ... ShadeTree   | 06/15/06
Perhaps....but in the end for me and mine that does not matter. Laff   | 06/16/06
Oh, they need the Macs, alright. MTMacPhee   | 06/19/06
Are you saying Macs are cheaper in price ??? machelpdesk   | 06/15/06
HP and Dell are overpriced pieces of ... swoopee   | 06/15/06
Ok, get over the first tier crap too... ajole   | 06/15/06
And next week timpin1@...   | 06/16/06
Not with any $50-$100 Mainboard ericblr   | 06/22/06
I dont think so... ericblr   | 06/22/06
Wall Street Journals says Macs are cheaper tic swayback   | 06/15/06
Read the Fine Print JoseTorr   | 06/15/06
Continue the quote tic!! NonZealot   | 06/15/06
It is the closest equivalent though tic swayback   | 06/15/06
Me 2 schneb   | 06/15/06
I like this idea Shelendrea   | 06/15/06
Yup that is why we are only purchasing one system for testing purposes. Laff   | 06/15/06
Still need two machines francine@...   | 06/15/06
You can... fizzmaster   | 06/15/06
better run Linux not windoze Linux Geek   | 06/15/06
Actually you can do em all I think.... Laff   | 06/15/06
Parallels does Linux. Doug K   | 06/15/06
LOL @ U Boot_Agnostic   | 06/15/06
How come ?....'Yawn' this is so old ! applez   | 06/15/06
You hear him Linux_Geek Boot_Agnostic   | 06/16/06
Why? JulesLt   | 06/16/06
Windows Licensing Issue editcorp   | 06/15/06
Ya might need Linux User 147560   | 06/15/06
Wow, are you really that confused? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 06/15/06
You completely missed the sarcasm... Linux User 147560   | 06/15/06
Is that what you were attempting? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 06/15/06
What is truly sad Shelendrea   | 06/15/06
No Ax, can you explain further tic swayback   | 06/15/06
Heh-heh 999ad@...   | 06/15/06
Ok, Here's Microsoft's scoop editcorp   | 06/15/06
back-apps-wards. shraven   | 06/15/06
Is "bloated" a Maximum PC term or yours? Laff   | 06/15/06
Speed test d_hawk   | 06/15/06
Excellent question timpin1@...   | 06/16/06
Excellent question timpin1@...   | 06/16/06
Excellent question timpin1@...   | 06/16/06
Excellent question NonZealot   | 06/16/06
Why? Many answers.... Laff   | 06/16/06
back-apps-wards NoBias   | 06/15/06
it's all well and good... st!lborn   | 06/15/06
What is so funny is that everyone wants Windows No_Ax_to_Grind   | 06/15/06
Not quite JulesLt   | 06/15/06
You'd like to think that wouldn't you? Shelendrea   | 06/15/06
Seems like an awful lot of work! NonZealot   | 06/15/06
You MUST stop using common sense in the talkbacks! No_Ax_to_Grind   | 06/15/06
Oh Really? Shelendrea   | 06/15/06
So then, start coding... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 06/15/06
More automotive allegories, even more ignorance. handydan918   | 06/15/06
Buzzzt wroing again... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 06/15/06
But you do NonZealot   | 06/15/06
I like your argument, but have a possible issue with it ajole   | 06/15/06
The ideal about keeping both OSX and her many applications Laff   | 06/16/06
What is REALLY silly: dshealey_z   | 06/16/06
Need I remind you Sabz5150   | 06/15/06
You prove my point perfectly NonZealot   | 06/15/06
More F.U.D. ? Rick_K   | 06/18/06
Amen! oops, sorry, religion sneaked in there! ajole   | 06/15/06
Someone finally gets it! GuidoMuldoon   | 06/15/06
And to run the apps they NEED Windows. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 06/15/06
Knock Knock Shelendrea   | 06/15/06
Ah, why the need to insult? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 06/15/06
YOU of all people just asked me that? Shelendrea   | 06/15/06
Wow, what a slick dodge to a question. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 06/15/06
why thankyou Shelendrea   | 06/15/06
...like a hole in their head Anthony Volpe   | 06/15/06
All the Apps JulesLt   | 06/16/06
Ummm the two camps DON'T want to run Jim Blaine - Bellingham WA.   | 06/15/06
It's not emulation it's virtualization GoPower   | 06/15/06
misinformation doh123   | 06/16/06
Tehy are avialable to all No_Ax_to_Grind   | 06/15/06
Not everyone WANTS to run Windows... MacCanuck   | 06/15/06
You is funny! NonZealot   | 06/15/06
So "is" you... MacCanuck   | 06/15/06
YOURE FUNNY pablo@...   | 06/15/06
broken link pablo@...   | 06/15/06
Wow, good job with the links!! NonZealot   | 06/15/06
HISTORY & KARMA pablo@...   | 06/15/06
I feel sorry for you NonZealot   | 06/16/06
Fer Christ's sake get a life! And a brain! Sean_Ssss   | 06/15/06
Perhaps you should try taking your own advice MacCanuck   | 06/15/06
So your complaint is... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 06/15/06
More along the lines of... Spikey_Mike   | 06/15/06
Ah I see, your IT guy is expert in the most widely No_Ax_to_Grind   | 06/15/06
Preferred? cuberantcamper   | 06/15/06
You missed the point paul.anderson@...   | 06/15/06
Silly B-Trace users. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 06/15/06
You'll find it's D-Trace JulesLt   | 06/16/06
Mischaracterizations tic swayback   | 06/15/06
EVERYONE? itanalyst   | 06/15/06
nope wrong premise... CMKRNL   | 06/16/06
yeh, great tool, now... st!lborn   | 06/15/06
Mac and Windows rgourlay@...   | 06/15/06
No thanks :) Kobashrer   | 06/15/06
You Sir, deserve a royal caning for this double post! st!lborn   | 06/15/06
No thanks :) Kobashrer   | 06/15/06
You Sir, deserve a royal canign for thi sdouble post! st!lborn   | 06/15/06
Don't blame him tic swayback   | 06/15/06
Program Possibilities TechStudent   | 06/15/06
take the plunge crazierthanu   | 06/15/06
Explanation JulesLt   | 06/16/06
What about Windows Updates and virus threats? salemomar@...   | 06/15/06
Windows on a Mac... handydan918   | 06/15/06
Yes and No calvinsman-one@...   | 06/20/06
RUN D:/ANNOYING.EXE Anthony Volpe   | 06/15/06
RUN D:/OBVIOUS.EXE NonZealot   | 06/15/06
LOL - Go Windows - It Created Qbasic petemod   | 06/19/06
Welcome to the same old discussion simbey1982   | 06/15/06
Bottom line People Shelendrea   | 06/15/06
The real world TonyMcS   | 06/15/06
There are very good reasons to produce Mac code calvinsman-one@...   | 06/20/06
I predicted this is where Apple was headed when... Linux_Fanboy   | 06/15/06
Why can"t we all just get along? cuberantcamper   | 06/15/06
They don't cost more SikosisZDNet   | 06/15/06
Anything that makes computer easier is OK with me fnash   | 06/15/06
PCs arent as cheap ... SikosisZDNet   | 06/15/06
Granny plumnilly   | 06/16/06
You need to check too fnash   | 06/16/06
I'm have a MAC ATTACK cuberantcamper   | 06/15/06
The need is there...... suziew411@...   | 06/15/06
Your decisions rule supreme over others Boot_Agnostic   | 06/16/06
Good move by Apple tangent001   | 06/16/06
I agree 100% NonZealot   | 06/16/06
Demanding an OSX port? Are you kidding? tangent001   | 06/16/06
We seem to already be there NonZealot   | 06/16/06
Yes, we are Fred Fredrickson   | 06/16/06
Windows users would probably turn up their nose at Mac- IronCladChicken   | 06/20/06
Most will calvinsman-one@...   | 06/20/06
Demanding an OSX port? Are you kidding? IronCladChicken   | 06/20/06
Your home combo is good calvinsman-one@...   | 06/20/06
It also gives people a chance to see... Linux_Fanboy   | 06/18/06
It Just Works Steve@...   | 06/16/06
But you are running Windows NonZealot   | 06/16/06
But Only When I Choose To! Steve@...   | 06/16/06
Why would you ever choose to use Windows? NonZealot   | 06/16/06
I agree doh123   | 06/16/06
But Only When I Choose To! Steve@...   | 06/16/06
omitted from the story? doh123   | 06/16/06
Sounds like it could be based on Xen hawkeyeaz1   | 06/16/06
Fantastic! Fred Fredrickson   | 06/16/06
Fast, Rilly Fast, yada yada, like what else is BEN supposed to say? Feldwebel Wolfenstool   | 06/16/06
Win & Mac Pheck   | 06/18/06
Bravo! More choices, more fun! calvinsman-one@...   | 06/20/06
Why run Windows on Mac john.burkert@...   | 06/19/06
RE; Why run Windows on a Mac deepsnow   | 06/19/06
Agree and Don't calvinsman-one@...   | 06/20/06
Why run windows on Mac nonextant   | 08/14/06
copying data kentfx_z   | 06/19/06
Yes and No calvinsman-one@...   | 06/20/06
MAC costs much less overall - simple Gene(ius):)   | 06/19/06