On TechRepublic: 4 registry tweaks to speed Windows XP
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By John Borland, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Sep 26, 2006 11:19:00 PM

Microsoft has filed a federal lawsuit against an alleged hacker who broke through its copy protection technology, charging that the mystery developer somehow gained access to its copyrighted source code.

For more than a month, the Redmond, Wash., company has been combating a program released online called FairUse4WM, which successfully stripped anticopying guards from songs downloaded through subscription media services such as Napster or Yahoo Music.

Microsoft has released two successive patches aimed at disabling the tool. The first worked--but the hacker, known only by the pseudonym "Viodentia," quickly found a way around the update, the company alleges. Now the company says this was because the hacker had apparently gained access to copyrighted source code unavailable to previous generations of would-be crackers.

"Our own intellectual property was stolen from us and used to create this tool," said Bonnie MacNaughton, a senior attorney in Microsoft's legal and corporate affairs division. "They obviously had a leg up on any of the other hackers that might be creating circumvention tools from scratch."

In a Web posting early Wednesday morning, Viodentia denied using any copyrighted Microsoft code, and released yet another version of his tool.

"FairUse4WM has been my own creation, and has never involved Microsoft source code," the developer wrote. "I link with Microsoft's static libraries provided with the compiler and various platform SDK (software development kit) files."

This latest round of copy-protection headaches comes at a delicate time for Microsoft. In a few months, the company plans to launch its own digital music subscription service, called "Zune," paired with an iPod device rival of the same name. The package will compete with services from Microsoft's traditional partners, such as Napster and Yahoo.

The Zune service and device will use their own flavor of digital rights management, and this will not be directly compatible with Microsoft's partners' products, despite being based on the same Windows Media technology. The company is taking great pains to assure its partners that their PlaysForSure-branded products are still state of the art.

Two-pronged approach
At the moment, Microsoft is taking a two-pronged technical and legal approach to FairUse4WM that goes beyond the scope of its earlier DRM battles.

On the technical side, it is pursuing much the same strategy as in the past: studying the hacker's tool and trying to update its Windows Media technology to block it.

Indeed, the company's Windows Media copy protection technology was designed from the start to support swift updates that would address inevitable cracks. That has long been part of the technology's draw for record labels and movie studios, which are fearful that content protection flaws will lead to films and music being swapped freely online.

Microsoft's copy protection has been cracked before and then quickly fixed. Company representatives said that the FairUse4WM tool, despite its developer's success in breaking through the company's first patch, is simply triggering the same kind of security review that has happened in the past.

"This particular circumvention doesn't change that reality at all, or affect the underpinnings of the system," said Marcus Matthias, a senior product manager at Microsoft. "This is not quite as 'cat and mouse' as some people might have you believe."

The crack's unusual longevity has caused ripples of worry inside the digital media community, however. One service provider, the British network BSkyB, even temporarily canceled movie downloads.

Representatives from other services say Microsoft's previous rights-management security updates have been successful and expect this effort ultimately to be no different.

"One of the great features of the Windows Media DRM is its renewability," said Bill Pence, chief technical officer at Napster. "When the DRM system is compromised, we can incorporate updates with minimal impact on users, and we expect to do the same with the current patch."

Using courts to track a cracker
However, the federal "John Doe" lawsuit, along with "dozens" of legal letters sent to Internet sites that are hosting the allegedly copyright-infringing tool, is a decidedly different tack for Microsoft.

The copyright lawsuit was filed in Seattle federal court last Friday, without a name attached. Just as in the recording industry's many lawsuits against accused file swappers, it targets an unknown individual or individuals, whose true identity will be sought in the course of the case.

For now, that means going to the Internet service providers for Web sites where the original FairUse4WM tool was released, in hopes of tracking down an IP address or other digital traces that might lead to the developer, MacNaughton said.

Microsoft is also contacting other Web sites that have posted the FairUse4WM tool, asking them to remove the software, on the grounds that it contains copyrighted company code.

Company representatives declined to speculate on exactly how "Viodentia" gained access to copyrighted source code. The code in question is part of a Windows Media software development kit, but is not easily accessible to anyone with a copy of that toolkit, Microsoft said.

So far, little is known about the developer, who has used the pseudonym "Viodentia" in several online postings at a site called Doom9.org. "Viodentia" could not immediately be reached for comment.

After spending an unaccustomed month of grappling with the problem, Microsoft representatives stopped short of promising their latest Windows Media update will be impregnable--although certainly, the hope is that a third patch won't be needed. Viodentia's newest release, posted online Wednesday, will test the strength of the company's latest approach.

"Any time we put out an update, it is our hope that it will be as efficacious as possible," Matthias said. "It is our hope that the technical mitigations that we've put in place will do something to impede this circumvention."

Analysts say that "Viodentia" hasn't proved that Microsoft's DRM tools are fundamentally flawed, but has shown that the business of keeping it, or any rights management system, secure is increasingly becoming a full-time job.

"Any DRM out there is going to be cracked," GartnerG2 analyst Michael McGuire said. "More important is how the technology service reacts. Someone has to be keeping an eye online all the time now, looking for the next time."

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 168 Talkback(s)
reverse engineered? sure?
i guess he encrypted a file( ok, when you cant do that, this theory is bullbeep), started ethereal and then wmp. i guess this might be possible, right?... (Read the rest)
Posted by: subway.cookie Posted on: 12/29/06 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Zune, iPod Was Start of HP identity theft mighetto   | 09/26/06
Another bogus "MS's Fault" report... John Zern   | 09/27/06
ROTFLMAO Beyond the Vista, a Leopard is stalking .   | 09/27/06
What don't you understand about ... Media-Ted@...   | 09/27/06
Isn't that Apple in this case? xuniL_z   | 09/28/06
OK, new term: Media-Ted@...   | 09/30/06
I think everyone missed the big picture! WV_z   | 09/27/06
Stole from Apple? mbrierley   | 09/28/06
Correction tic swayback   | 09/28/06
First of all xuniL_z   | 09/28/06
Well... zkiwi   | 09/28/06
huh?? xuniL_z   | 09/28/06
WRONG! Rick_K   | 09/28/06
SORRY, BUT YOU ARE WRONG!! xuniL_z   | 09/28/06
standardized... misi999   | 09/28/06
If it weren't for the sentiments xuniL_z   | 09/28/06
Moral frgough   | 09/26/06
No, the 'moral' mdemuth   | 09/26/06
The problem beaner1111@...   | 10/04/06
Challenging the Lexmark precedent Edward Meyers   | 09/26/06
How did they get ahold of the code? nucrash   | 09/27/06
The dog walking the human ... lalogos   | 09/27/06
good depends on your point of view voska   | 09/27/06
wow, that shoe fits me! shraven   | 09/27/06
Re: The dog walking the human ... sstephenlposey@...   | 09/27/06
Cartoons chinese.bookie   | 09/27/06
What the... MythicalMe   | 09/27/06
Chamberlain was Conservative FoxFord   | 09/27/06
Hmm Chamberlain mbrierley   | 09/28/06
Microsoft is a criminal organisation. DemonX   | 09/27/06
Assertions, assertions zkiwi   | 09/27/06
DRM encryption will soon be irrelevant! Irritated_User   | 09/27/06
Ah, the analog hole ! Yamust B. Kiddingme   | 09/28/06
THANK-YOU!!!! beaner1111@...   | 10/04/06
If it truly provided for "fair use" I might have some sympathy for MS shawkins   | 09/27/06
And if this was a Linux hack.... DragonBRockin   | 09/27/06
Uhh since we don't have these kinds of restrictions Linux User 147560   | 09/27/06
But isn't Linus fighting fo rthe right John Zern   | 09/27/06
The only thing he is fighting is GPL v3 Linux User 147560   | 09/27/06
Careful LU.. Monkey_MCSE   | 09/27/06
We wish tic swayback   | 09/27/06
Drop the crak pipe , and stop being in denial , MS code is C.R.A.P. <NT> Beyond the Vista, a Leopard is stalking .   | 09/27/06
Just so as you know... zkiwi   | 09/27/06
RE: And if this was a Linux hack.... joe6pack_z   | 09/28/06
Atleast the "Analyst's" realize something... ju1ce   | 09/27/06
Just Release The Source To All The File-Sharing Sites itanalyst   | 09/27/06
DRM was meant to be broken #_z   | 09/27/06
Well, if he didn't use MS source code... PB_z   | 09/27/06
Wasn't DeCSS removal forced? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 09/27/06
Correct, but #_z   | 09/27/06
They claimed it violated trade secret Edward Meyers   | 09/27/06
It would seem to me No_Ax_to_Grind   | 09/27/06
Like throwing eggs at shadows voska   | 09/27/06
Re: Wasn't DeCSS removal forced? none none   | 09/27/06
I see no No_Ax_to_Grind   | 09/27/06
Re: I see no none none   | 09/27/06
Reverse engineering isn't illegal voska   | 09/27/06
Gee, guess you never heard of DMCA huh? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 09/27/06
Nope. Edward Meyers   | 09/27/06
Bzzzt, wrong... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 09/27/06
EULA and DMCA davids@...   | 09/27/06
EULAs themselves violate the basic fundamental principles of contract law. Joel R   | 09/27/06
Security feature ?? pkrdk   | 09/28/06
Um, no voska   | 09/27/06
re: DMCA and other countries dpastern   | 09/27/06
I'm curious to know! Spikey_Mike   | 09/27/06
Really??? DNSB   | 09/27/06
EULA has nothing to do with it Yagotta B. Kidding   | 09/27/06
What about beaner1111@...   | 10/04/06
Try that again #_z   | 09/27/06
Your memory is a little off, too critic-at-arms   | 09/27/06
Reverse-engineered code dms350   | 09/27/06
Reverse engineering - speaking of history jim.shaw@...   | 09/27/06
purchased? ttocsmij   | 09/27/06
Thanks e're so much Media-Ted@...   | 09/27/06
They did not raggi   | 09/28/06
Huh? draciron@...   | 09/27/06
Reverse engineering in itself not illegal, but the end result is John Zern   | 09/27/06
Not Quite . . . What Is a Patent? graphyx@...   | 09/30/06
Not Quite . . . graphyx@...   | 09/30/06
DeCSS and similar programs are still out there. B.O.F.H.   | 09/27/06
Message has been deleted. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 09/27/06
Which is why.... tic swayback   | 09/27/06
Re: I agree, low life scum will always exist. none none   | 09/27/06
Now We Know Ole Man   | 09/27/06
Now we know dellaszoo   | 10/01/06
Scum Bucket X41   | 09/27/06
Self-absorbtion Yagotta B. Kidding   | 09/27/06
anyone else you'd like to offend? shraven   | 09/28/06
If this was illegal zkiwi   | 09/27/06
Has the copyright infringement... Spikey_Mike   | 09/27/06
Welcome to the DMCA Edward Meyers   | 09/27/06
lol, so they tell websites to take it down.. it will just end up on Been_Done_Before   | 09/27/06
Er... A.Sinic   | 09/27/06
Reason ben7352@...   | 09/28/06
Nothing stops them from asking voska   | 09/27/06
Instill fear of later litigation Ngallendou   | 09/27/06
Copyright infringement carlor@...   | 09/27/06
Although oddly enough zkiwi   | 09/27/06
If ya can't beat em, cheat em bony tryan   | 09/27/06
M$ Funded SCO wjgrimm   | 10/04/06
Fortunatly for us TripleII   | 09/27/06
MS is assuming Shelendrea   | 09/27/06
Your missing a key element draciron@...   | 09/27/06
Preview of a new MS tactic? critic-at-arms   | 09/27/06
While I understand... BitTwiddler   | 09/27/06
DRM is the root of all evil drorharari   | 09/27/06
DRM is not just about crippling fair use rights tic swayback   | 09/27/06
DMCA is the Root... entraxon1190   | 09/28/06
doesn't feel so good does it MS? mypl8s4u2   | 09/27/06
Wow, what a ranting little guy you are. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 09/27/06
Opinion granted mypl8s4u2   | 10/02/06
Oh look. Another one John Zern   | 09/27/06
Not all of us TripleII   | 09/27/06
Finally, ... I'm sorry, ... Who? Media-Ted@...   | 09/27/06
don't forget bitty (although he may be no_axe) - nt. aladorn@...   | 09/29/06
Yes, probably, maybe zkiwi   | 09/27/06
Or another viewpoint crayolakidd   | 09/29/06
They will have to change the name msdead   | 09/27/06
Has ANY of the content providers considered... msdead   | 09/27/06
no, because it doesn't earn them their annual 'bonus' zoroaster   | 09/27/06
I see this story has upset msdead   | 09/27/06
Can no one see the big picture here? cyberian_z   | 09/27/06
Right On!!!!! garlicfog@...   | 09/27/06
Give Me a Break!!!!!! garlicfog@...   | 09/27/06
Thief As Robbery Victim... bradhall44   | 09/27/06
Give YOU a Break?????? mikeholli   | 09/29/06
tardy2 tardy2   | 09/27/06
Why, indeed??? Media-Ted@...   | 09/27/06
Hypocracy at it's finest. draciron@...   | 09/27/06
DRM is useless anyway ifrancis@...   | 09/27/06
Because they own them....... Hitparader   | 09/27/06
Actually the public owns it Edward Meyers   | 09/27/06
Disney? ccrashh   | 09/29/06
absolutely different oskiller@...   | 09/29/06
Couldn't happen to a better (?) company! OldStuff   | 09/27/06
MS deserves it OldStuff   | 09/27/06
What's the fuss? It's just Microsoft throwing a tantrum again. ttocsmij   | 09/27/06
Oh the irony ... zoroaster   | 09/27/06
Old Russian Joke Yagotta B. Kidding   | 09/27/06
brain's not fast enough humble99   | 09/27/06
I've said it before and Suicida|   | 09/27/06
Yes! It's about time! Angelsinthealley   | 09/27/06
well well... subway.cookie   | 12/29/06
Microsoft sues... starman_gary   | 09/27/06
The Points that we and M$ should be aware of.... Jay E Court   | 09/27/06
Long Live..... Jay E Court   | 09/27/06
I call bull mobrien_12@...   | 09/27/06
Considering how well written the WGA crap was Xwindowsjunkie   | 09/27/06
hacker anniehines00@...   | 09/28/06
Was it one of you Boot_Agnostic   | 09/28/06
RE: Microsoft sues over source code theft Protagonistic   | 09/28/06
All MS can do is Blame themselves rupaa62   | 09/28/06
DRM Stripped? So what? TechinMN   | 09/28/06
WHAT'S IN MICROSOFT? BALTHOR   | 09/28/06
My rights. birdmaniw   | 09/28/06
Thank Congress and international copyright associations Boot_Agnostic   | 09/28/06
Why don't the FairUse4WM author share the stolen source + FairUse4M source? GreatInca   | 09/28/06
He didn't steal the code TripleII   | 09/28/06
If he didn't steal the code, then he probably reverse engineered it GreatInca   | 09/28/06
reverse engineered? sure? subway.cookie   | 12/29/06
Kiss-Off Ole Man   | 09/29/06
good argument, hippie einsteintech   | 09/29/06
Brown Nose Ole Man   | 09/29/06
An interesting side note to all this controversy Confused by religion   | 09/29/06
absolutely NOT! conchyjoe7   | 09/29/06
Is the giant really a Leprechaun hoarding his gold?? ProfessorJWN   | 09/30/06
Is the giant really a Leprechaun hoarding his gold?? ProfessorJWN   | 09/30/06

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

Whitepapers & Webcasts

The Green Enterprise