On CNET: DJs - A club-worthy USB mixer
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Michael Kanellos, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Oct 14, 2004 5:49:00 PM

Intel is dumping plans to release a Pentium 4 processor that runs at 4GHz, saying it will boost performance on next year's chips using other means than clock speed.

The Santa Clara, Calif.-based chip company said it plans to brief PC manufacturers Thursday on the latest changes to its processor road map. The main change is that the 4GHz Pentium 4--scheduled for release early next year and originally due out at the end of 2004--won't come out at all now.

Instead, Intel will boost performance on its chips by increasing the size of the cache, a pool of memory located on the processor for rapid data access. Current mainstream Pentium 4s now have 1MB cache. In the future, these chips will have 2MB of cache, like Intel's Xeon server chips and the "Extreme Edition" Pentium 4s designed for gaming PCs.

Intel will continue to come out with Extreme Edition chips by boosting the bus speed and cache size, said Bill Kirby, director of platform marketing at Intel.

The first mainstream Pentium 4 with 2MB of cache will run at 3.8GHz and come out early next year, an Intel representative said. Larger caches will then cascade down the Pentium 4 product line, the representative added.

The chipmaker also intends to emphasize more sharply technologies such as 64-bit functionality, HyperThreading and a security technology called LaGrande. It will also increase development efforts on dual-core chips with the goal of a 2005 release.

Intel has already "taped out," or completed, the design on its dual-core Pentium-style chips, Kirby said, a major milestone that Intel has not announced until now. Typically, chips start to come out a year or so after taping out.

Behind the shift is Intel President Paul Otellini, who wants the company to move away from focusing on increases in chip speed, measured in megahertz, as the primary way to increase performance. Intel has talked about such a shift for years, but remained fond of the clock-speed approach until recently. Speeches by executives about moving away from megahertz were often closely followed by announcements of faster chips.

Technically, Intel could likely come out with a 4GHz chip, said Dean McCarron, principal analyst at Mercury Research. Hobbyists are already running Pentium 4s at 6GHz, and game machine specialist Alienware is selling an overclocked 4GHz system.

On the other hand, Intel would have to put so many engineering and testing resources into qualifying a 4GHz Pentium to work in all conditions that the cost would far outweigh any financial benefit. Because Intel's dual-core chips are set for release in 2005, only a few thousand 4GHz chips would likely have been sold, McCarron said.

"It's somewhat embarrassing, in that they have promised this product for a really, really long time," McCarron said. "But it was the right decision to make."

Problems with power consumption and heat that accompany megahertz increases are likely another spur for the change. Processors with larger caches or two cores can run at lower speeds than conventional chips--hence they produce less heat and consume less energy, but provide better performance. "Hot spots"--high energy centers on chips that crank out heat--can also be spread out or reduced.

To further reduce power consumption, the company plans to begin in 2007 to produce a desktop chip code-named Merom. The processor is based on the more energy-efficient architectures from Intel's notebook chip line-up.

Chips with larger caches can be more expensive to make, because fewer can be produced out of a single wafer. Two factors, however, will soften the overall impact of a larger chip size. Earlier this year, Intel shifted to the 90-nanometer manufacturing process, which leads to smaller chips. The company also said that, because of an inventory surplus, it will scale back production in the current quarter.

"When you aren't running the fabs at 100 percent, there is no (financial) penalty to doing this," McCarron said.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 88 Talkback(s)
All just puppets.
eom (Read the rest)
Posted by: b.d.hi Posted on: 06/20/05 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Too Bad. ONEstar   | 10/14/04
Re:Too Bad djt0711   | 10/14/04
Congratulations Republidrone! Jeff Spicoli   | 10/14/04
blah, blah, yadda, yadda valope   | 10/14/04
Sheesh, what a Demidrone daver_z   | 10/14/04
Whacked Or Highjacked like Bushiepoo's Gov iconoclastt   | 10/14/04
Wow. catlord17   | 10/15/04
BWAHAHAHAHA!!! Jeff Spicoli   | 10/15/04
All just puppets. b.d.hi   | 06/20/05
OK, whatever CobraA1   | 10/15/04
Do you realize how ridiculous you sound? Jeff Spicoli   | 10/15/04
Y tu? Spoon Jabber   | 10/15/04
No one ever sounds ridiculous for telling it like it is.. Jeff Spicoli   | 10/15/04
Bush Wasn't Wired...here's why.... DigitalKid   | 10/15/04
Ridiculous? SelfGovern   | 10/15/04
check the record lengua99   | 10/16/04
If you see... Spoon Jabber   | 10/15/04
I'd like you to honestly tell me something.. Jeff Spicoli   | 10/15/04
That's a contradiction! Spoon Jabber   | 10/15/04
Have you done ANY research into September 11th? Jeff Spicoli   | 10/15/04
This should help Spoon Jabber   | 10/15/04
Wow Jeff Spicoli   | 10/15/04
Really? Then why... Spoon Jabber   | 10/15/04
I have to admit..that wuz pretty cute.. Jeff Spicoli   | 10/15/04
the truth about 9-11 V Sanders   | 10/15/04
V, same with Pearl Harbor Spoon Jabber   | 10/15/04
They Prevented a DEPRESSION lengua99   | 10/16/04
History Check History   | 10/29/04
Bush Bonehead akalaniz1   | 10/15/04
Then call me "pea-brained" Spoon Jabber   | 10/15/04
To my fact-based points you belch out what? akalaniz1   | 10/15/04
Osama and Al-Qaeda were not responsible for 9/11 Jeff Spicoli   | 10/15/04
the truth about 9-11 V Sanders   | 10/15/04
V, you need to bone up on some facts Jeff Spicoli   | 10/15/04
I wish richdave   | 10/15/04
OK Spoon Jabber   | 10/15/04
BTW Spoon Jabber   | 10/15/04
Historical facts imply Bush sucks akalaniz1   | 10/15/04
Road Scholar = bonehead akalaniz1   | 10/15/04
lol doh123   | 10/15/04
Wow! akalaniz1   | 10/15/04
Is this George Soros? lengua99   | 10/16/04
Too Bad. ONEstar   | 10/14/04
In Other News, Smurf Village Was Leveled By Gargamel itanalyst   | 10/14/04
Where was Azriel while this was going on?? Letophoro   | 10/14/04
Boy are you misinformed Spoon Jabber   | 10/15/04
Playing major catchup to AMD64 BitTwiddler   | 10/14/04
I was hoping to get one for Winter Jomo_z   | 10/14/04
No KIDDING !!!! realitycheck101   | 10/14/04
your a little off base doh123   | 10/14/04
You're so witty. billywill   | 10/14/04
This is the type of misstep... joshdcohen@...   | 10/14/04
its not a blunder doh123   | 10/14/04
4ghz mlrodman@...   | 10/14/04
Unless they are running Windows and using IE The King's Servant   | 10/14/04
That's Right, I had to make it about MS when it's really about Intel :-) The King's Servant   | 10/14/04
Ah, but you presume Fred Fredrickson   | 10/14/04
90% of users SC-man   | 10/18/04
Good Direction j-pennie   | 10/14/04
Faster speed not utilized j-pennie   | 10/14/04
EVER FASTER PROCESSORS R NECESSARY!! wiskowst   | 10/15/04
re: EVER FASTER PROCESSORS R NECESSARY!! richdave   | 10/15/04
re: even faster processors R necessary saphil@...   | 10/20/04
Hz is frequency doh123   | 10/15/04
AMD All the Way! kokuryu   | 10/14/04
What do you mean no 4GHz P4? Me_too   | 10/14/04
4.77? JMarkMurphy   | 10/14/04
Average smaverage, I for one James Dean_z   | 10/14/04
You do not need more CPU power... The King's Servant   | 10/18/04
Already been taken to 5.25 GHz Letophoro   | 10/14/04
This is bad... flatliner   | 10/14/04
Interesting CobraA1   | 10/14/04
Well there goes Christmas...... SatelliteSteve   | 10/15/04
Question dodged... Flablooie   | 10/15/04
oops... Flablooie   | 10/15/04
I'm sorry, you had a question? Spoon Jabber   | 10/15/04
This is GOOD jswift   | 10/15/04
Yes Spoon Jabber   | 10/15/04
re Intel kills plans for 4GHz Pentium V Sanders   | 10/15/04
They have done it before saphil@...   | 10/20/04
Vote Bush! Experience and Results count! akalaniz1   | 10/17/04
Yes I will, thank you! Spoon Jabber   | 10/17/04
Geez, why the political post? CobraA1   | 10/17/04
Although Bush IS smarter than SC-man   | 10/18/04
Not mysterious Spoon Jabber   | 10/18/04
You get my vote because Kerry Sux! menk   | 10/19/04
Your Wasting your time Cypher_z   | 10/20/04
this will save many power supplies from early death pinback_z   | 10/21/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

Ultraportables

advertisement
Click Here