On CHOW: Turkey recipes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Matthew Broersma
Posted on ZDNet News: Oct 24, 2003 1:21:00 AM

A supercomputer built by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University from 1,100 dual-processor Macintosh G5 PCs looks likely to rank with the five fastest machines in the world, despite costing a relative pittance.

In preliminary performance tests carried out on 2,112 of the system's 2,200 processors, the so-called "Big Mac" cluster achieved 8.1 teraflops, or trillions of operations per second, according to figures published on Wednesday. The system is still being tuned, and final results won't be announced until next month, but the performance figure would place the Big Mac at No. 4 on the list of the world's fastest 500 supercomputers.

The figures are remarkable partly because Macintosh hardware has long been absent from the top 500 list, but also because of the Big Mac's cost. In a world where the top machines traditionally cost $100 million to $250 million, and take several years to build, the Mac-based system cost just over $5 million, and was put together in about a month.

Virginia Tech said the final performance figure could be much higher. The 8.1-teraflop figure is only 48 percent of the system's theoretical peak of 16.8 teraflops, and it may be possible to squeeze more efficiency out of the cluster.

Among the three machines ranked above the Virginia Tech system, Japan's top-ranked Earth Simulator runs at 87 percent of its theoretical peak, and the other two run at 67 percent and 74 percent. The figures were posted in a report by Jack Dongarra, a University of Tennessee computer scientist who maintains the top 500 list. Earlier tests using just a few of the Big Mac's processors reached roughly 80 percent of the theoretical peak.

Virginia Tech plans to use the cluster to perform research on nanoscale electronics, chemistry, aerodynamics, molecular statics, computational acoustics and molecular modeling, among other tasks.

The servers in the cluster are connected through 24 high-speed Infiniband switches from Mellanox Technologies. Infiniband, which was developed by a consortium of server and storage companies, provides greater bandwidth than other technologies on the market, such as Miranet, and can often cost less. The cluster also uses a cooling system from Liebert, a division of Emerson Network Power, as well as Gigabit Ethernet switches from Cisco Systems.

Clustering, which involves linking hundreds or thousands of computers to tackle massive projects, has opened the supercomputing market up to companies other than those such as IBM and Cray that have long made supercomputers. Dell has emerged as one of the leaders in selling clusters to research institutions such as Cornell University. Utah's Linux Networx, meanwhile, has won contracts to install systems at Los Alamos National Laboratory and other national research laboratories.

Japan's Earth Simulator, with 5,120 custom processors, was measured at 35.8 teraflops last year, and is estimated to have cost up to $250 million. ASCI Q, a Hewlett-Packard machine running on 8,192 Alpha chips, is ranked No. 2 at 13.8 teraflops.

The third-ranked system on the official list is, like the Big Mac, a cluster: it was built by Linux Networx for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory from 2,304 2.4GHz Xeon chips, and runs at 7.6 teraflops. Another HP-built machine powered by Intel's Itanium 2 processors has not yet officially entered the list, but it would rank above the Big Mac, at 8.6 teraflops, according to Dongarra's figures.

Matthew Broersma of ZDNet UK reported from London. CNET News.com's Ina Fried and Michael Kanellos contributed to this report.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 48 Talkback(s)
Is it OK?
If Apple wants to fight for not more than 3% of the market ?
it?s OK. Our society has masochists, sadists, etc. who are
pretty happy with what they are doing.

At the beginning S. Jobs ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: gulic Posted on: 10/28/03 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Lies, Lies...surely?  Fred Fredrickson | 10/23/03
Lies, lies and and unused rubbish...  Schottland | 10/24/03
get a clue  weels | 10/24/03
He /did/ say it was a guess...  dw@... | 10/24/03
seriously  ryusen | 10/24/03
re: Lies, lies and and  Still Lynn | 10/24/03
$3200 for a xeon?  JoeMama_z | 10/24/03
who cares about xeon?  stephen732@... | 10/24/03
credit where credit is due  ryusen | 10/24/03
Just to let you know  Harry Butts | 10/25/03
re: Just to let you know  bgoss@... | 10/25/03
On a cluster machine..  d_jedi | 10/24/03
LOL, you guessed wrong  Rick_K | 10/24/03
Well good for them  FilledOut | 10/24/03
Well good for them  Publius_z | 10/24/03
Nooo! That'd just usher in the age of Skynet  FilledOut | 10/24/03
Yeah but...  Michael Kelly | 10/24/03
Three words to solve their problem  Harvey Birdman | 10/24/03
wooord!!  JoeMama_z | 10/24/03
Opteron/Athlon 64 FX  cerealdud | 10/24/03
true  doh123 | 10/24/03
Power 980  dscherf | 10/24/03
Who cares?  James T. Kirk | 10/24/03
Obviously you care enough to read the article and post!!!  Blue Wolf_z | 10/24/03
have you never used a Mac?  stephen732@... | 10/24/03
Macs have nothing to do with it..  d_jedi | 10/24/03
Macs have everything to do with it  MacCanuck | 10/27/03
Troll feeding (should know better)  bgoss@... | 10/24/03
Macs are too expensive..  d_jedi | 10/24/03
Macs are too expensive (not)  bgoss@... | 10/24/03
More money + less performance = too expensive  d_jedi | 10/26/03
clueless in redmond  stephen732@... | 10/26/03
Heh....  James T. Kirk | 10/24/03
Who cares?  bgoss@... | 10/24/03
Everyone Should Care!  Byran | 10/24/03
So.....  James T. Kirk | 10/24/03
So... don't know  Byran | 10/24/03
Will it change the market?  Vily Clay | 10/24/03
Get a clue Vily  bgoss@... | 10/24/03
Time To Correct Mac Price Misconceptions  Hard Cider | 10/25/03
Don't feed the trolls  dscherf | 10/25/03
Apple may die because of your high-price-support.  Vily Clay | 10/26/03
And you still conveniently forget  MacCanuck | 10/27/03
Is it OK?  gulic | 10/28/03
Well, OSX Server killed NT in the 3rd Largest US Industry  Yen_z | 10/27/03
Fast Computer  boatelc | 10/26/03
Cynicism causes short-sightedness it seems  YuridaMan | 10/27/03
Who Cares!!!  james@... | 10/27/03

What do you think?

Click Here
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here