On TechRepublic: A view of 12 billion year-old galaxies
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Stephen Shankland
Posted on ZDNet News: Feb 18, 2004 3:46:00 AM

An IBM Unix server using the company's own Power processors has beaten out an Intel Itanium system in a widely watched server speed test, Big Blue announced Tuesday, the opening day of an Intel processor conference.

A $5.6 million 32-processor IBM p690 was able to perform 1.025 million transactions per minute on the Transaction Processing Performance Council TPC-C test. The previous top score for a nonclustered system, 1.008 million transactions per minute, was logged by Hewlett-Packard's Superdome using 64 Itanium 2 processors.

IBM released the speed test results and touted its Power processor on opening day of Intel's Developer Forum in San Francisco. In 2003, IBM announced its last top TPC-C score with a Power-based server the same day it announced its first Itanium servers.

The TPC-C test simulates a computerized warehouse inventory, with numerous outside computers submitting orders and other transactions. IBM also beat HP's score in price-performance, though discounts of high-end gear in the competitive server market can distort the importance of list prices.

IBM's system used Big Blue's version of Unix, called AIX. HP's top scoring system runs the HP-UX version of Unix. Itanium processors can run Windows, HP-UX and Linux, whereas Power processors can run AIX, Linux and IBM's specialized OS/400 operating system.

In addition, IBM's system used the company's DB2 database software, whereas HP's used Oracle.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 15 Talkback(s)
Not a Big Deal - Power4 is a dual core chip
IBM is way behind Itanium on per-core performance. They have been playing the benchmark game with dual core Power4 chips for two years now. You don't really know what IBM used to achieve this benchm... (Read the rest)
Posted by: desultorypolemic Posted on: 02/19/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Only in this instance...... NOT on production servers, so who cares.  DonB_z | 02/18/04
Only in this instance......  scurling | 02/18/04
You missed a bit...  Fred Fredrickson | 02/18/04
So who cares ... I do!!  dwjohnso | 02/18/04
Apple/Big Blue Symbiosis  pepetoo@... | 02/18/04
RISC architecture always wins ...  George Mitchell | 02/18/04
a couple points.  ryusen | 02/18/04
CISC/RISC ... irrelevant.  Fred Fredrickson | 02/18/04
64 bit SQL and Windows Advanced Server 64bit are faster  DonB_z | 02/18/04
No, it's not. Read the TPC benchmark.  Fred Fredrickson | 02/18/04
What you all have missed (so far)  middle of nowhere | 02/18/04
Not only but also  Fred Fredrickson | 02/18/04
Good!  michael-t | 02/18/04
price of PowerPC  paul@... | 02/18/04
Not a Big Deal - Power4 is a dual core chip  desultorypolemic | 02/19/04

What do you think?

Click Here
advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here