On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Matt Hines
Posted on ZDNet News: Jul 29, 2004 7:05:00 PM

Apple Computer on Thursday issued a scathing response to RealNetworks' move to unlock Apple's proprietary technology and make it possible for people to listen to music in RealNetworks' digital file format on iPod devices.

In a terse statement, a "stunned" Apple accused RealNetworks of adopting the "tactics and ethics of a hacker" with the release of its Harmony software. Harmony allows songs sold via RealNetworks' online store to be played on a variety of portable devices, including Apple's iPod and Microsoft-compatible rivals.

Apple threatened to block access to the iPod using Harmony the next time it updates the software used to run the device. The company last week unveiled the fourth generation of the trend-setting music player.

"It is highly likely that Real's Harmony technology will cease to work with current and future iPods," the company said in its statement.

In addition, Apple said it is investigating the implications of Real's software strategy under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and other laws. The DMCA broadly restricts the bypassing of copy-protection technologies used in DVDs and in some music CDs and software programs.

RealNetworks has been selling songs from its digital song store since January, but the files previously could be played only on a few portable devices. Apple has refused to provide licenses to companies seeking iPod compatibility, and RealNetworks did not seek permission before releasing the software.

Later on Thursday, RealNetworks issued its own statement in response to Apple's accusations. The company contends that consumers, not Apple, should be the ones controlling which music files can be played on their iPods. And the DMCA is not applicable to Harmony, RealNetworks said, because the antipiracy legislation "explicitly allows the creation of interoperable software."

RealNetworks said that it has no plans to change the application and that Harmony was created "in a well-established tradition of fully legal, independently developed paths to achieve compatibility."

Harmony automatically changes songs created in other formats into files that will play on an iPod. Since Apple refused to license its FairPlay copy-protection software to RealNetworks, the company had its engineers create their own version of the application in order to make the device play them back. Although the company said this action wasn't technically "reverse engineering," legal experts have observed that Apple may have some recourse if it decides to pursue the matter aggressively.

But one industry watcher was uncertain how strong a case Apple might have under DMCA, even though the company has had success defending its trademarks, as in 2000 when it reached settlements with several hardware makers accused of selling knockoffs of its iMac computers.

Regardless of whether Apple goes to court, it's likely that the company has little to worry about from the RealNetworks technology, said Tim Deal, an analyst with Technology Business Research in Hampton, N.H.

"I think the public will see this as sour grapes, since Real couldn't reach a deal with Apple," he said. "I'm not sure there are that many people out there who really want to work with multiple music platforms."

Apple does need to defend its proprietary iPod technology, Deal said, since the device's top selling point has been the integrated package of the music player and music files sold over the company's iTunes digital music service. But since Apple counts on iTunes primarily as a driver of iPod sales, Deal predicted that the company's profits won't suffer because of Harmony.

"Real is looking for music store revenue, whereas Apple really uses iTunes just to sell more iPods," he said. "As long as people are still buying iPods, the immediate threat posed by (Harmony) would not seem all that significant."

CNET News.com's John Borland contributed to this report.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 244 Talkback(s)
DCMA and DRM Should Be Illegal
So here's the scoop if you build a piece of hardware and
can make it at least hard for consumers to use it with
anything but your software, media, etc. you make a ton of
money. That's why ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: baceman007 Posted on: 09/13/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
The DMCA abused again!  Tim Patterson | 07/29/04
Re: The DMCA abused again!  PottHead | 07/29/04
but where is the DMCA violation?  ryusen | 07/29/04
Playing The Same Hand  ParadigmOdyssey | 07/30/04
Actually  ParadigmOdyssey | 07/30/04
Really?  tgrady | 07/30/04
Vendor lock-in? How...  mzarra | 07/29/04
It is vendor lock-in  voska | 07/29/04
Definately Not.  ollie_z | 07/29/04
Apple is not wrong...  ryusen | 07/29/04
True...  ollie_z | 07/30/04
Apple didn't write the DMCA  BitTwiddler | 07/29/04
your kidding right?  ryusen | 07/29/04
The DMCA was designed to combat copyright infringement  voska | 07/29/04
DCMA and DRM Should Be Illegal  baceman007 | 09/13/08
Companies run for legal cover  PmAc_z | 07/29/04
Go, go DMCA!!!  Jomo_z | 07/29/04
what?  doh123 | 07/29/04
How are there management stupid?  dave95 | 07/29/04
not stupid, but lame...  ryusen | 07/29/04
Why should Apple care what I put on my I-POD?  voska | 07/29/04
The answer is quite simple why Apple cares...  mlindl | 07/29/04
I find the opposite actually  voska | 07/30/04
Poor argument  johnnyu | 07/30/04
Not A Very Intelligent Statement  xero11 | 07/29/04
My reply  d_jedi | 07/29/04
You Make A Good Point . . .  xero11 | 07/29/04
Eww WMP files.  Rick_K | 07/29/04
Its backwards engineering, not hacking  johnnyu | 07/30/04
It's hard not to laugh  Chad_z | 07/29/04
Apple is not a monopoly  mzarra | 07/29/04
monopoly no, anti competitive yes  prong@... | 07/29/04
You need to stop smoking that crack  Rick_K | 07/29/04
Apple  lax57_z | 08/01/04
Depends on how you define the market  rapson | 07/29/04
I knew the DMCA would come up  Arrg | 07/29/04
something is wrong with the ipod?  doh123 | 07/29/04
There is something wrong with iTunes  AbsolutelyNot | 07/29/04
something wrong will ALL music players...  ryusen | 07/29/04
So all your music...  ollie_z | 07/29/04
I use itunes  Arrg | 07/29/04
They will when the can't get song X  voska | 07/29/04
is everyone jumping the gun?  doh123 | 07/29/04
Not if Apple follows in MicroSoft's footsteps!  kd5auq | 07/29/04
I can say it, do you know what it means?  mzarra | 07/29/04
Huzzah!  ollie_z | 07/29/04
Merriam-Webster says  AbsolutelyNot | 07/29/04
Flame Bait  nomorems | 07/29/04
Hey TechDiva  rapson | 07/29/04
that's nothing...  ryusen | 07/29/04
Monopoly  middle of nowhere | 07/29/04
I'm 'stunned' at Apple's response  d_jedi | 07/29/04
I agree 100%!  worknman | 07/29/04
Again they are protecting their business!  dave95 | 07/29/04
I think it's a bad choice  worknman | 07/29/04
Here's a novel concept  dave95 | 07/29/04
i don't care what their reasons are...  ryusen | 07/29/04
I guess...ah, whatever!  ollie_z | 07/30/04
re:  ryusen | 07/30/04
Sounds familar  lengua99 | 08/09/04
For ZZ & Leguna (did I spell that right?)  ollie_z | 08/10/04
How about  Rick_K | 07/29/04
History  johnnyu | 07/30/04
I'll Agree  el1jones | 07/29/04
Just imagine  AbsolutelyNot | 07/29/04
OK...  Yen_z | 07/29/04
Correction...  Yen_z | 07/29/04
in this case...  ryusen | 07/29/04
If Apple refused to help then Real is clear of the DMCA  voska | 07/29/04
Can we say IM battle?  kb0old1978 | 07/29/04
Apple (the pot) Microsoft (the kettle)  Alpha_Female | 07/29/04
What has MS to do with this in any way?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/29/04
Elementary my dear Watson  Squawkbox | 07/29/04
Microsoft's fault  BruceWheelock@... | 07/29/04
OMG he said Gigli  Squawkbox | 07/29/04
You're both off-base  Fred Fredrickson | 07/29/04
Fred Fred Fred calm down I am not attacking Apple  Squawkbox | 07/29/04
Actually it was Apple who did that  voska | 07/29/04
Same ole same ole  FilledOut | 07/29/04
Neither is yours..  d_jedi | 07/29/04
Whoops!  d_jedi | 07/29/04
Why doesn't Real create it's own market?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/29/04
There you go again..  d_jedi | 07/29/04
Gotta agree with Ax  TWRX | 07/29/04
I'm sorry, but this is NOT beneficial ...  worknman | 07/29/04
Everything in life is give and take...especially business  Laff | 07/29/04
Poor Excuse  nikoli | 07/29/04
Only time will tell..At this point it does not seem  Laff | 07/29/04
NO its not!  dave95 | 07/29/04
Look at it this way ...  worknman | 07/29/04
$.99 tunes going away?  AbsolutelyNot | 07/29/04
Look at it from a different perspective...  Laff | 07/29/04
oerhaps, but...  ryusen | 07/29/04
Ah..but what percentage are we talking about here?  Laff | 07/30/04
re: laff  ryusen | 07/30/04
It's called choice?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/29/04
Here is the difference ...  worknman | 07/29/04
Well traveling to another store...  Laff | 07/29/04
Again, so what?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/29/04
Yes but you can buy food elsewhere  voska | 07/29/04
Lousy argument  quietLee | 07/29/04
Duh  johnnyu | 07/30/04
The iPod also plays...  Rick_K | 07/29/04
but...  ryusen | 07/29/04
So why is this Apple's fault alone? Does not  Laff | 07/30/04
Because of the response  johnnyu | 07/30/04
listen to my real argument...  ryusen | 07/30/04
Just for you...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/29/04
and so?  ryusen | 07/29/04
Hogwash...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/29/04
what belongs to apple...  ryusen | 07/30/04
STOP THIS ZZ!! You are having me agree with AX  Laff | 07/30/04
Isn't that exactly how capitolism normally works?  voska | 07/30/04
Like I said "The two extremes are wrong"  Laff | 07/30/04
re: pepsi and coke...  ryusen | 07/30/04
ok.. let's get one thing clear...  ryusen | 07/30/04
They did. BUT,  James T. Kirk | 07/29/04
Real has made big mistakes..  d_jedi | 07/29/04
Amen. (NT)  James T. Kirk | 07/29/04
not that you are concerned with the consumer at all...  ryusen | 07/29/04
Bzzzztttt. Wrong (As usual)  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/29/04
True but wouldn't it be nice  voska | 07/30/04
It would be nice if everyone just got along too...  Laff | 07/30/04
is your only method of debate  ryusen | 07/30/04
Corporations do that all the time  voska | 07/29/04
I called this the other day  prong@... | 07/29/04
People are forgetting the point  Bill_gates_Is_SATAN | 07/29/04
Uhh...probably because...  KOS-MOS | 07/29/04
Why no winamp  ibabadur1 | 07/29/04
Say what?  KOS-MOS | 07/29/04
but...  ryusen | 07/29/04
WINAMP is the best  Bill_gates_Is_SATAN | 07/30/04
Pardon me?  Counselor_Beep | 07/29/04
Please get a sense of humor  Bill_gates_Is_SATAN | 07/30/04
Who said anything about MAC?  Bill_gates_Is_SATAN | 07/30/04
Apple's response is puzzling...  LongShipUser | 07/29/04
My iPod doesn't belong to Apple  interlocutor | 07/29/04
Couldn't Agree More  nikoli | 07/29/04
Apple is making a Big Mac of a Mistake!  Counselor_Beep | 07/29/04
You might want to check your facts.  Rick_K | 07/29/04
MS only wants MS software to run on Windows  nomorems | 07/29/04
Not true  rapson | 07/29/04
Apple iPod is a fad  ibabadur1 | 07/29/04
Apple should sue  TWRX | 07/29/04
Of course, you're right ...  worknman | 07/29/04
Sorry dude but Apple is no charity....  Laff | 07/29/04
True, But That's Where The Argument Starts  nikoli | 07/29/04
That depends..If Apple can increase it's song selection  Laff | 07/29/04
What If Your Entire Music Library...  nikoli | 07/29/04
Again what percentage of potential customers  Laff | 07/30/04
Apple's being foolish  voska | 07/29/04
IBM was foolish not to protect her PC hardware tech  Laff | 07/30/04
Goofed up contract  voska | 07/30/04
look at your profit arguement...  ryusen | 07/29/04
Easy Answer  nikoli | 07/29/04
Job's ego is a double edges sword.....  Laff | 07/30/04
i would...  ryusen | 07/30/04
Apple Should Get Over It  Yehuda Mann | 07/29/04
have you been payign attention?  ryusen | 07/29/04
People with sucky technology  supoman | 07/29/04
Why Apple And Their iPod S*ck Balls  nikoli | 07/29/04
Um..unlike many CD players ..the iPod is mobile  Laff | 07/29/04
Maybe because you aren't thinking  nikoli | 07/29/04
Yeah I have 3 portable CD players  voska | 07/29/04
Nikoli..gumba! We both seem to be missing each others point  Laff | 07/30/04
My point  voska | 07/30/04
I agree with your point with one simple variation.  Laff | 07/30/04
These LIcensing Deals...  johnnyu | 07/30/04
weak  johnnyu | 07/30/04
Not challenged  nomorems | 07/29/04
What about wma files?  Rick_K | 07/29/04
THEY don't understand?  JimmyJames | 07/30/04
Apple fans tend to get blind over apple  justoneperson | 07/29/04
A better example would be ...  worknman | 07/29/04
Good one - software is for hardware  justoneperson | 07/29/04
Yet MS does this all the time.  Rick_K | 07/29/04
You are correct  alterego_z | 07/29/04
That's right  justoneperson | 07/29/04
Isn't that what other companies do?  justoneperson | 07/29/04
Apple don't be Microsoft  nograin | 07/29/04
No they aren't.  gordon@... | 07/29/04
Large corporate or not!  dave95 | 07/29/04
Is it lunacy, ignorance,...  MacCanuck | 07/29/04
It's probably a bit of both  justoneperson | 07/29/04
I guess you don't own an iPod  Rick_K | 07/29/04
A few things wrong with that...  rafe01 | 07/30/04
hypocrite  gordon@... | 07/29/04
Response ...  worknman | 07/29/04
Response ...  worknman | 07/29/04
This bears repeating....  MacVet | 07/29/04
So you're saying ...  worknman | 07/29/04
Conversions  MacVet | 07/29/04
The latest version of iTunes  Rick_K | 07/29/04
unless  zijiang | 07/29/04
not the point...  rafe01 | 07/29/04
You got a single point correct.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/30/04
No clue  johnnyu | 07/30/04
yeah but...  rafe01 | 07/30/04
It's not the player at issue  AbsolutelyNot | 07/29/04
ipod hack or legit programming?  justoneperson | 07/29/04
...ummm...it might do...  rafe01 | 07/29/04
Research....  justoneperson | 07/29/04
Thanks for noticing..  rafe01 | 07/30/04
Go figure  JimmyJames | 07/29/04
Some what ifs for your lack of insight  johnnyu | 07/30/04
oh come on  NoMac | 07/29/04
To "NoMac"  MacVet | 07/29/04
iRiver is just a less elegant iPod clone  Germanicus | 07/29/04
Need age limit before someone post!  dave95 | 07/29/04
No Mac and MacVet are the same guy right?  justoneperson | 07/29/04
Apple is not wrong to defend it's product  balsover | 07/29/04
So what about...  rapson | 07/29/04
Depends on the license agreement  balsover | 07/29/04
No license for products you buy and own  voska | 07/29/04
Can't say  balsover | 07/29/04
You still don't get it...  mlynch1234 | 07/30/04
Obviously have no clue on copyrights  voska | 07/30/04
Licence not the issue  rafe01 | 07/30/04
Different issue  Fred Fredrickson | 07/29/04
are you sure?  ryusen | 07/30/04
...that's the rub  rafe01 | 07/30/04
It's not about Open Source or not  voska | 07/29/04
Then don't buy them  balsover | 07/29/04
I refuse to buy any of them  voska | 07/29/04
open source  balsover | 07/29/04
Still what does that have to with Open Source?  voska | 07/30/04
Apples, Oranges, Strawberries, and the music they listen too...  nomorems | 07/29/04
iPod just jumped the shark!  ejhonda | 07/29/04
A great set of arguments  Len Rooney | 07/29/04
now wash your mouth out with soap and water...  rafe01 | 07/30/04
Typical  ParadigmOdyssey | 07/30/04
Business Models  John CarrollZDNet Moderator | 07/30/04
*THE* key point ot your post.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/30/04
So Brilliant  johnnyu | 07/30/04
you forgot...  ryusen | 07/30/04
This isn't new for Apple business 101  FilledOut | 07/30/04
DMCA strikes again...  jwschull@... | 07/30/04
WOW  voska | 07/30/04
Well, people are passionate this stuff....and iPods  dave95 | 07/30/04
A monopoly is a monoply no matter what the size.  kd5auq | 07/30/04
It's BetaMax and Macintosh OS all over again  marmocida | 07/30/04
last comment best...  rafe01 | 07/30/04
This is Why I'll Never Own Proprietary Player!  Miint | 07/31/04
except its not Apple and MS  rafe01 | 07/31/04

What do you think?

Click Here
advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here