On CBS MoneyWatch: 5 Best College Towns to Live In
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By John G. Spooner
Posted on ZDNet News: Jan 28, 2005 4:10:00 PM

The U.S. government is apparently taking a closer look at the national security implications of IBM's plan to sell its PC business to China's Lenovo Group.

The government's Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States, or CFIUS, which reviews acquisitions of U.S. businesses by foreign corporations, has opted for an extended review of the deal, The Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg reported Friday.

Although the extended investigation does not signal an attempt to block the deal--all transactions involving U.S. and offshore companies are subject to a minimum of a 30-day review by the CFIUS--fewer cases are said to make it to the extended review process, which is required to take 45 days or less, the news agencies reported.

A Treasury Department representative declined to comment on the matter, citing federal security rules. But IBM said it is working with the committee.

"IBM is cooperating fully, and we are confident in the process and its outcome," Ed Barbini, an IBM spokesman, told CNET News.com on Friday.

Although the extended review might be considered to be fairly rare, it's not unexpected in the case of IBM and Lenovo. Earlier this week, federal lawmakers urged CFIUS to conduct a full investigation of the proposed sale. Bloomberg also reported earlier this week, citing unnamed sources, that the deal is being closely examined by CFIUS.

"First, this transaction may transfer advanced U.S. technology and corporate assets to the Chinese government," according to a letter, signed by Reps. Henry Hyde, R-Ill., chair of the House International Relations Committee; Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., chair of the House Armed Services Committee; and Don Manzullo, R-Ill., chair of the House Small Business Committee. "Second, this transaction may transfer licensable or export-controlled technology to the Chinese government. Finally, this transaction may result in certain U.S. government contracts with or involving (personal computers) being fulfilled or participated in by the Chinese government."

Announced in December, IBM's plan to transfer its PC business to Lenovo is valued at $1.75 billion. Under the deal, Lenovo will take over daily operations of IBM's PC business and will be able to use IBM PC brands such as ThinkPad for five years. IBM will take an 18.9 percent stake in the new Lenovo, which would reincorporate in the United States.

Normally, CFIUS would have until the end of January to either approve the Lenovo deal or pass it along for further investigation and ultimately presidential clearance. The three representatives, who urged the extended review, said that's not a realistic deadline as the merger announcement was made while Congress was on holiday recess.

Barbini noted that "IBM believes that the CFIUS process is an appropriate and effective way to address the national security interests of the United States."

The Lenovo deal cleared one of its first regulatory hurdles earlier this month when the Federal Trade Commission indicated it would not raise any antitrust objections.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 2 Talkback(s)
What did IBM do
to get the pro-business Republican wonks to come down on them? You can off-shore your entire business, but you can't sell it outright to the off-shore company? What's the freaking difference?... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Roger Ramjet Posted on: 01/31/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
ahh come on  FilledOut | 01/30/05
What did IBM do  Roger Ramjet | 01/31/05

What do you think?

Click Here
advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More