On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By John G. Spooner
Posted on ZDNet News: Feb 7, 2005 7:49:00 PM

Intel has hotrod desktop PCs in mind for its first dual-core processors.

The chipmaker said Monday that it will launch a pair of dual-core processors for high-end desktops during the second quarter. In doing so, Intel narrowed the time frame for when its first dual-core chip will be available to consumers and businesses. Previously, the company had said only that it would be available in 2005.


Roundup
Intel doubles down
with dual cores
Read all our coverage
of the chip cognoscenti
gathering at the Inter-
national Solid-State
Circuits Conference.


A dual-core chip is one that places two processor cores in one chip package. Intel discussed the new technology at the International Solid-State Circuits Conference, or ISSCC, being conducted this week in San Francisco.

Intel says its first dual-core chip will be an Intel Pentium Processor Extreme Edition designed to power desktops for PC enthusiasts such as game players and those who work with multimedia such as music and video.

Extreme Edition will offer Intel's HT Technology, otherwise known as hyperthreading, allowing it to simultaneously process four threads, or streams of data (two threads per core), an Intel representative said. Given its advertised performance, Extreme Edition will likely come in systems that inhabit the upper reaches of the desktop PC market, such as Dell's Dimension XPS. Dell said Monday that it would offer dual-core chips from Intel in Dell-brand desktops.

Intel will follow Extreme Edition with a standard dual-core desktop processor known by the code-name Smithfield. That chip will also come out during the second quarter, the representative said.

Together, the two chips will use performance to elbow their way into the desktop market. Given their advertised edge in performance compared with single-core chips, the new dual-core chips are a natural offering for high-end machines, Intel argues. Intel has said that a dual-core chip could speed up PCs by a large percentage by dividing up the job of processing data.

Of the two types of chip, it's Smithfield that's likely to offer lower prices and performance and therefore show up in somewhat less-expensive configurations.

Intel will use dual-core chips in many other areas as well. The desktop announcement is expected to be the first of many unveilings for the chipmaker during the course of this year and beyond. The company plans to offer either dual-core or multicore chips (which pack four or more processor cores) in all of its product lines in the near future. Overall, the company is working on working on more than 10 multicore processor projects, the representative said.

Also this week at ISSCC, the chipmaker is expected to discuss Montecito, a forthcoming dual-core version of its Itanium server chip.

Yet despite offering a few more details on its dual-core desktop chips, Intel was mum on many other specifics, including clock speeds. Instead, the company representative said only that the first dual-core desktop chips will run more slowly than today's speediest single-core chips. Intel's fastest desktop chip is its Pentium 4, which runs at 3.8GHz.

Intel isn't the only chipmaker expecting twins, however. Nearly every company that offers processors has multicore ambitions. IBM, for one, has been selling dual-core chips for servers for a few years, while ARM sells dual-core chips for cell phones.

Intel's PC rival, Advanced Micro Devices, has also said it will create chips with two, four and eight cores, starting with dual-core chips this year.

Hector Ruiz, AMD's chief executive, said recently that AMD aims to offer a dual-core Opteron server chip during the summer.

Although its focus is on dual-cores, Intel will continue to offer single-core processors for some time. It plans to boost the performance of its current line of single-core Pentium 4s, for example, and sell them alongside its dual-core offerings.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 144 Talkback(s)
Dual AMD
I have a dual Opteron box I built based on the Tyan K8W mobo. I set processor affinity so that all my background apps run on proc 2, and leave proc 1 for running foreground apps. Since most Windows ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: jklincewicz Posted on: 02/14/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Dual Processors  brhighlander | 02/07/05
Mama told me,"Never argue with an Idiot"  Feldwebel Wolfenstool | 02/07/05
Companies have been shipping dual processor Intel systems...  ShadeTree | 02/07/05
So what's changed  dfgh11 | 02/07/05
Talking blindly  PA-ITGuy | 02/07/05
Dual Macs RULE!  samnobody | 02/07/05
Yes they do...  brhighlander | 02/07/05
RE: Yes they do...  richdave | 02/07/05
Support  PA-ITGuy | 02/07/05
Stand corrected  brhighlander | 02/07/05
chevy (linux) vs. ford (mac) vs yugo (windows)  linuxoverwindows | 02/07/05
My comparison...  PA-ITGuy | 02/07/05
thats a better comparison lol.  linuxoverwindows | 02/07/05
Great opinion  brhighlander | 02/07/05
i couldnt compare linux to a ricer... :P  linuxoverwindows | 02/08/05
OS 9 ?  agottschald | 02/07/05
Yes  PA-ITGuy | 02/07/05
Dual processors dual core  mcaprio_z | 02/07/05
Mac with Duals already  samnobody | 02/07/05
dual CORE Processors  davidbuj@... | 02/07/05
Pity the Poor Mac Guys  PMC-CON | 02/07/05
Not so  brhighlander | 02/07/05
Multitasking != Multiprocessing  PA-ITGuy | 02/07/05
Thanks for the lesson  brhighlander | 02/07/05
No problem  PA-ITGuy | 02/07/05
Not at all  brhighlander | 02/07/05
PS: Mac Multitasking  PA-ITGuy | 02/07/05
gotcha  brhighlander | 02/07/05
plenty of ram on xp?  linuxoverwindows | 02/07/05
speed  brhighlander | 02/07/05
im not sure, but xp is a hog  linuxoverwindows | 02/07/05
what your clients are complaining about...  linuxoverwindows | 02/07/05
Windows  brhighlander | 02/07/05
windows on linux  linuxoverwindows | 02/07/05
Because Windows Is Not Emulated.  The King's Servant | 02/07/05
yeah, thats the prob im having...  linuxoverwindows | 02/08/05
Linux Vs. Windows  Arcus1234 | 02/08/05
w.i.n.e.  linuxoverwindows | 02/08/05
Right and wrong.  The King's Servant | 02/07/05
Dual Processor Sparc stations  voska | 02/07/05
Sun sold an unusual "Dual Processor" machine...  The King's Servant | 02/07/05
kinda sounds like...  linuxoverwindows | 02/08/05
Quite true...  The King's Servant | 02/08/05
Its not about PCs vs. Macs  Arthur Seltzer | 02/07/05
shared video memory lmao  linuxoverwindows | 02/07/05
When we say PC's do we mean WIntel?  The King's Servant | 02/07/05
My own preference...  The King's Servant | 02/07/05
RE: Its not about PCs vs. Macs  richdave | 02/07/05
Incorrect  Terry1 | 02/07/05
its no use...  linuxoverwindows | 02/07/05
Not Always True  Terry1 | 02/07/05
generally...  linuxoverwindows | 02/07/05
Watch the stereotyping happy  PA-ITGuy | 02/07/05
i know, these talkbacks are bogus... lol  linuxoverwindows | 02/08/05
Perspective  Mack DaNife | 02/08/05
From what I've seen...  PA-ITGuy | 02/08/05
Dual PII-266S / Linux 2.6.9  Joe Frisco | 02/07/05
RE: Dual PII-266S / Linux 2.6.9  richdave | 02/07/05
Dual procs  Predator_z | 02/09/05
Missing the point  dajohnso | 02/10/05
Intel has an edge  ferrit@... | 02/07/05
Intel has doody!  samnobody | 02/07/05
Yes, let''s DO look at the facts!  Stewart Cannon | 02/07/05
Your stats show some promise though  voska | 02/07/05
Your stats are meaningless.  The King's Servant | 02/07/05
Competition is good  dajohnso | 02/10/05
about time  jon2err@... | 02/07/05
dual proc...  webwevol@... | 02/07/05
If it's not 64 bit it's trash  joseph1942 | 02/07/05
Ummm...  PA-ITGuy | 02/07/05
32-bit addressing issues for Intel  samnobody | 02/07/05
I Repeat  PA-ITGuy | 02/07/05
but what about having to use drive loaders...  linuxoverwindows | 02/07/05
Memory...  PA-ITGuy | 02/07/05
lol, what a www we weave happy  linuxoverwindows | 02/07/05
LOL!  critique | 02/07/05
Don't confuse the data buss with the...  ShadeTree | 02/07/05
You're confused  CobraA1 | 02/07/05
Give it up..  Prognosticator | 02/07/05
Intel is still behind AMD!  samnobody | 02/07/05
Dual AMD  jklincewicz | 02/14/05
not yet  keenan@... | 02/07/05
usually, prices go down...  linuxoverwindows | 02/07/05
RE: not yet  richdave | 02/07/05
Dual Processors  nrkmann@... | 02/07/05
Good Point  brhighlander | 02/07/05
Hmm.. Old News  ctwizard | 02/07/05
no  Macmax77 | 02/07/05
Time for dual processors  cmitch1222 | 02/07/05
My Gentoo can! and my FGFS too.  The King's Servant | 02/07/05
insert x-files theme here  linuxoverwindows | 02/08/05
You need to get out more  dajohnso | 02/10/05
Who cares?  voska | 02/07/05
hmm  AZR Technologies | 02/07/05
Quite agree  Chad_z | 02/08/05
Try running XP on a 8mhz machine  dajohnso | 02/10/05
2?  Predator_z | 02/09/05
Disk I/O vs Procesor I/O  dajohnso | 02/10/05
There are no dual core...  ShadeTree | 02/07/05
They should name it "HeatWAVE"...  thetruth_z | 02/07/05
No joke  daver_z | 02/08/05
Computers that heat you house  paveway | 02/10/05
Seti  dajohnso | 02/10/05
STOP!!! WRITING around the OS!  JRD_z | 02/07/05
Not true!  dajohnso | 02/10/05
STOP!!! WRITING around the OS!  JRD_z | 02/07/05
i agree...  linuxoverwindows | 02/08/05
Come on Intel... Get a Life  topperace | 02/07/05
32 vs. 64  cmaitlan | 02/07/05
then wtf is this im typing on  wizardb@... | 02/07/05
Good one !!  Prognosticator | 02/07/05
I think you missed  PA-ITGuy | 02/07/05
I am about to replace my K6-2 450 MHz Gentoo 2.6 kernel box  The King's Servant | 02/07/05
Curious  Mack DaNife | 02/08/05
Say what??  Predator_z | 02/09/05
Two processors...  agottschald | 02/07/05
That Laptop you were talking about,  The King's Servant | 02/07/05
Yes I know the one.  agottschald | 02/07/05
Speed = Power!  dajohnso | 02/10/05
Intel Dual Cores  Buzz937 | 02/07/05
Dual CPU's  jekoski@... | 02/07/05
2 BILLION TRANSISTORS CAN DO NO WRONG.  VONDRASHEK@... | 02/07/05
Dual Processors  wb9ddf | 02/07/05
IBM ?  webwevol@... | 02/07/05
IBM and Motorola both.  The King's Servant | 02/08/05
Odd numbers...?  N_M | 02/08/05
intel hasn't a clue  morwen | 02/08/05
Front SIde Bus: Gotta feed the Proc.  docsavage | 02/08/05
True. Hence the HyperTransport technology of AMD.  The King's Servant | 02/08/05
What about Windows XP's Limits  TelcoChuck | 02/08/05
Good question  PA-ITGuy | 02/08/05
New O/S  Predator_z | 02/09/05
So late to the game...  B.O.F.H. | 02/08/05
By John G. Spooner CNET News.com February 7, 2005, 11:49 AM PT  The King's Servant | 02/08/05
ANd how long has IBM/PowerPC been multicore?  B.O.F.H. | 02/08/05
PowerPC Multi-Core and 64Bit as well  bolhui | 02/08/05
Great!  Predator_z | 02/09/05
Correct me if i am wrong.  Bio_nuclear | 02/08/05
AMD64 vs INTEL 32/2  CustodianR | 02/09/05
Core Dualies  catwiskerradio | 02/09/05
Windows multi-processing  dajohnso | 02/10/05
Disk I/O vs Processor I/O  dajohnso | 02/10/05
Does power = productivity?  RimaDog@... | 02/12/05
Yes - assign 2nd pro to user 'real' command  moses_z | 02/14/05

What do you think?

Click Here
advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More