On CHOW: 10 good cheap liquors
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Dawn Kawamoto
Posted on ZDNet News: Jul 12, 2005 7:02:00 PM

update European regulators raided the offices of Intel and a number of PC-related companies early Tuesday as part of an antitrust investigation into the chip giant.

As part of the dawn raid, European Commission officials and national competition authorities in Milan, Italy; Munich, Germany; Madrid, Spain; and Swindon, England, descended on several Intel offices, a Commission representative said and an Intel representative confirmed. The officials also visited a number of companies that manufacture or sell computers.

"These inspections are being carried out within the framework of an ongoing investigation," a Commission representative said.


Related story
Intel chief fires
back at AMD suit

Intel's Paul Otellini
says his company
competes aggressively
and fairly.

Intel said it is cooperating fully with investigators.

"Our normal business practice is to cooperate, and we are doing (that) so far in this case," Intel representative Chuck Mulloy told CNET News.com. "We firmly believe that our business practices are fair and lawful."

The United Kingdom's Office of Fair Trading, or OFT, said that it had assisted the European competition authorities in an "on-site inspection" of Intel's Swindon offices.

"It is really a European Commission matter," said an OFT spokeswoman. She said the inspection was likely to have been carried out under article 81 of the EC Treaty, which prohibits price fixing and other distortions of competition within the European Union. The spokeswoman could not say whether anything was removed from Intel's offices.

The investigation comes just weeks after rival Advanced Micro Devices filed suit against Intel, alleging the chip giant has used scare tactics and coercion to prompt computer makers and other companies to use Intel's chips instead of rivals'. Intel's chief executive, Paul Otellini, has said that he expects his company to come out on top in the dispute.

In the European inquiry, other PC makers and retailers were reportedly questioned.

Dell, which exclusively sells products based on Intel chips, said the company's headquarters in Bracknell, England, were visited Tuesday by officials from the Commission's competition division. But the company declined to give details of what the officials were doing or the nature of the visit.

As of 5:30 p.m. local time, Commission investigators were still on the premises and Dell was cooperating fully, said Claire Ramage, a Dell representative in Europe.

European representatives of Hewlett-Packard said that the company's offices were not visited by Commission officials on Tuesday. IBM representatives were not immediately available to comment.

Other PC makers had little to say. German electronics retailer MediaMarkt declined to state its relationship with either Intel or AMD. And DSR Retail, the parent company for U.K.-based online retailer Dixons, declined to say whether it was visited as part of the probe, but reiterated its earlier stance that a reference to Dixons in AMD's complaint against Intel is factually incorrect.

A source familiar with antitrust issues predicted that Intel will not have much to say about the probe right away.

"Normally, these companies are pissed when their offices are raided, but there is nothing they can do about it," the source said. "They see update European regulators raided the offices of Intel and a number of PC-related companies early Tuesday as part of an antitrust investigation into the chip giant.

As part of the dawn raid, European Commission officials and national competition authorities in Milan, Italy; Munich, Germany; Madrid, Spain; and Swindon, England, descended on several Intel offices, a Commission representative said and an Intel representative confirmed. The officials also visited a number of companies that manufacture or sell computers.

"These inspections are being carried out within the framework of an ongoing investigation," a Commission representative said.


Related story
Intel chief fires
back at AMD suit

Intel's Paul Otellini
says his company
competes aggressively
and fairly.

Intel said it is cooperating fully with investigators.

"Our normal business practice is to cooperate, and we are doing (that) so far in this case," Intel representative Chuck Mulloy told CNET News.com. "We firmly believe that our business practices are fair and lawful."

The United Kingdom's Office of Fair Trading, or OFT, said that it had assisted the European competition authorities in an "on-site inspection" of Intel's Swindon offices.

"It is really a European Commission matter," said an OFT spokeswoman. She said the inspection was likely to have been carried out under article 81 of the EC Treaty, which prohibits price fixing and other distortions of competition within the European Union. The spokeswoman could not say whether anything was removed from Intel's offices.

The investigation comes just weeks after rival Advanced Micro Devices filed suit against Intel, alleging the chip giant has used scare tactics and coercion to prompt computer makers and other companies to use Intel's chips instead of rivals'. Intel's chief executive, Paul Otellini, has said that he expects his company to come out on top in the dispute.

In the European inquiry, other PC makers and retailers were reportedly questioned.

Dell, which exclusively sells products based on Intel chips, said the company's headquarters in Bracknell, England, were visited Tuesday by officials from the Commission's competition division. But the company declined to give details of what the officials were doing or the nature of the visit.

As of 5:30 p.m. local time, Commission investigators were still on the premises and Dell was cooperating fully, said Claire Ramage, a Dell representative in Europe.

European representatives of Hewlett-Packard said that the company's offices were not visited by Commission officials on Tuesday. IBM representatives were not immediately available to comment.

Other PC makers had little to say. German electronics retailer MediaMarkt declined to state its relationship with either Intel or AMD. And DSR Retail, the parent company for U.K.-based online retailer Dixons, declined to say whether it was visited as part of the probe, but reiterated its earlier stance that a reference to Dixons in AMD's complaint against Intel is factually incorrect.

A source familiar with antitrust issues predicted that Intel will not have much to say about the probe right away.

"Normally, these companies are pissed when their offices are raided, but there is nothing they can do about it," the source said. "They see what investigators have come up with and what is being accused...before they contact" authorities with an explanation.

In most cases, investigators search through hard-copy documents and computer files, the source noted.

An AMD spokesman praised the Commission's raid.

"The strong steps taken by the European Commission today shows Intel cannot escape the scrutiny of antitrust officials around the world, nor the consequences of anticompetitive actions," said Mike Simonoff, an AMD spokesman.

A history of disputes
AMD filed its suit against Intel on June 24. A few days later, AMD Japan filed suit against Intel K.K., the chip giant's Japanese unit.

But AMD's recent lawsuits are only the latest battle the company has waged with Intel, and the smaller chipmaker in fact urged the European Commission to look at its rival. AMD complained to European antitrust regulators five years ago, alleging that Intel was engaging in "abusive" marketing programs. But the investigation remained relatively quiet for a couple of years.

AMD filed a new complaint with the Commission last year, and after a raid of Intel's offices by Japanese officials as part of a separate inquiry, European antitrust regulators said they were taking a close look at Intel and sent out 64 letters of inquiry to computer makers and retailers.

Japanese officials had made the findings of their raid available to antitrust agencies in other countries.

Intel reached an agreement a few months ago with Japan's Fair Trade Commission, which called on the chip giant to stop requiring PC makers to limit the use of competitors' chips in exchange for discounts. Intel agreed to abide by the recommendations, though the company said it disagreed with the agency's findings and conclusions.

Also last year, European officials said they would investigate the practice of some member states' procurement policies, which restricted computer purchases to only those that used Intel chips.

Graeme Wearden and Matt Loney of ZDNet UK contributed to this report.

what investigators have come up with and what is being accused...before they contact" authorities with an explanation.

In most cases, investigators search through hard-copy documents and computer files, the source noted.

An AMD spokesman praised the Commission's raid.

"The strong steps taken by the European Commission today shows Intel cannot escape the scrutiny of antitrust officials around the world, nor the consequences of anticompetitive actions," said Mike Simonoff, an AMD spokesman.

A history of disputes
AMD filed its suit against Intel on June 24. A few days later, AMD Japan filed suit against Intel K.K., the chip giant's Japanese unit.

But AMD's recent lawsuits are only the latest battle the company has waged with Intel, and the smaller chipmaker in fact urged the European Commission to look at its rival. AMD complained to European antitrust regulators five years ago, alleging that Intel was engaging in "abusive" marketing programs. But the investigation remained relatively quiet for a couple of years.

AMD filed a new complaint with the Commission last year, and after a raid of Intel's offices by Japanese officials as part of a separate inquiry, European antitrust regulators said they were taking a close look at Intel and sent out 64 letters of inquiry to computer makers and retailers.

Japanese officials had made the findings of their raid available to antitrust agencies in other countries.

Intel reached an agreement a few months ago with Japan's Fair Trade Commission, which called on the chip giant to stop requiring PC makers to limit the use of competitors' chips in exchange for discounts. Intel agreed to abide by the recommendations, though the company said it disagreed with the agency's findings and conclusions.

Also last year, European officials said they would investigate the practice of some member states' procurement policies, which restricted computer purchases to only those that used Intel chips.

Graeme Wearden and Matt Loney of ZDNet UK contributed to this report.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 204 Talkback(s)
Not that easy
Actually the price of the equipment is not all that bad. It keeps getting cheaper all the time. The professional grade stuff is still expensive. But were talking consumer stuff.

The protrait th... (Read the rest)
Posted by: osreinstall Posted on: 07/14/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Hope the hostages were rescued safely  Prognosticator | 07/12/05
Put your hands up and the stock portfolios down  Boot_Agnostic | 07/12/05
EU ..... Things to do today  Squawkbox | 07/12/05
Ammendments to the list  Real World | 07/12/05
Funny how the EU and Japan have joined into a 20 year old food fight  Squawkbox | 07/12/05
Lot's of money in US companies  Prognosticator | 07/12/05
Noticed that trend also did you?  Squawkbox | 07/12/05
Ho hum...  Fred Fredrickson | 07/12/05
No Fred  Squawkbox | 07/12/05
Hmmm...  zkiwi | 07/12/05
i remember  DemonX | 07/12/05
Antitrust Suits stop Power-Hungry Companies,  WarHippy | 07/12/05
You have swallowed the hook line and sinker.  Squawkbox | 07/13/05
...And I would have been the next to bite...  The King's Servant | 07/13/05
One more to your list  Prognosticator | 07/12/05
Right On, Finally, Someone who doesn't believe in......  WarHippy | 07/12/05
that's one way of looking at it  unoriginal_sin | 07/12/05
Feel kind a bad about being a US citizen huh?  Squawkbox | 07/12/05
Don't Make me start talking about Bauxite and the '70's  The King's Servant | 07/12/05
I am well aware of that incident and it is wrong  Squawkbox | 07/12/05
Sour Grapes?!?  The King's Servant | 07/13/05
Just out of morbid curiosity  Squawkbox | 07/13/05
For your morbid [sic] curiosity...  The King's Servant | 07/13/05
...To here, where?  The King's Servant | 07/13/05
Legislating from the bench ...  lalogos | 07/12/05
BOO HOO :  James Schroer | 07/12/05
M$ and Intel have been screwing us over in the IT world?  Squawkbox | 07/12/05
Eloquently??  WarHippy | 07/12/05
OOOOO he cans say ARSE  Squawkbox | 07/13/05
I have an AMD system...  The King's Servant | 07/13/05
(How is that last paragraph for eloquence?)  Squawkbox | 07/13/05
I guess you must be posting here without first reading?  The King's Servant | 07/13/05
EU/UN....  Hey U | 07/12/05
What makes you think USA respects WTO?  FirstNLastN | 07/12/05
RE: What makes you think USA respects WTO?  Squawkbox | 07/12/05
Hey, You Forgot.....  WarHippy | 07/12/05
You are so right  scidhuv00 | 07/12/05
Anti-Americanism and martrydom  lalogos | 07/12/05
And maybe OJ is innocent.  The King's Servant | 07/12/05
Oh Yeah??  WarHippy | 07/12/05
Target USA Companies?  The King's Servant | 07/12/05
Nice Try. You missed  Squawkbox | 07/12/05
You Better Duck Then  WarHippy | 07/12/05
NWOR (nt)  Squawkbox | 07/13/05
Duck!  The King's Servant | 07/13/05
You left some stuff out  osreinstall | 07/12/05
Well said and true (NT)  Squawkbox | 07/12/05
The secret is Intel does what Bill Gates wants: DRM-chips to control ...  Vily Clay | 07/12/05
Clue for ya..  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/12/05
Red Letter Day  tic swayback | 07/12/05
Nothing cripped about protecting YOUR data tic.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/12/05
It's not my data I'm worried about  tic swayback | 07/12/05
Go read your EULA if you are running...  Colonel_Panic | 07/12/05
Ok, maybe I shot from the hip, but...  Colonel_Panic | 07/12/05
Craapy product is a great way to shorten upgrade cycle  weiedm | 07/12/05
And how is this a GOOD thing?  Laff | 07/12/05
Carrots versus Sticks  tic swayback | 07/12/05
As both a consumer and user... It's a good thing.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/12/05
Does your whole machine have to be crippled to achieve this?  tic swayback | 07/12/05
The Machine isn't crippled  osreinstall | 07/12/05
It is crippled  tic swayback | 07/12/05
It is not crippled.  osreinstall | 07/12/05
So it is crippled  tic swayback | 07/13/05
It still isn't crippled  osreinstall | 07/13/05
Check your dictionary  tic swayback | 07/13/05
Re: Check your dictionary  Colonel_Panic | 07/13/05
I checked it, and you are wrong  osreinstall | 07/13/05
Nouns versus verbs  tic swayback | 07/13/05
I already did twister of descriptions  osreinstall | 07/13/05
I'm the twister? Ha! It is to laugh.  tic swayback | 07/13/05
Tic, the Sly One!  osreinstall | 07/13/05
Sly like a rabid fox...  tic swayback | 07/13/05
Pragmatism will bring you peace  osreinstall | 07/13/05
Thanks for the link  tic swayback | 07/13/05
On part of your post  osreinstall | 07/13/05
You're letting them off easy  tic swayback | 07/14/05
Not that easy  osreinstall | 07/14/05
MS-Intel deal is bigger. Do you propose just to watch how they screw us? NT  Vily Clay | 07/12/05
What "deal" are you talking about. AMD does the same.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/12/05
Spreading disinformation again?  tic swayback | 07/12/05
I do!  The King's Servant | 07/12/05
No_Ax, please clarify: are you too blind or too corrupted? (NT)  Vily Clay | 07/12/05
Vily !!!!!!! Your back. I need a good chuckle.  Squawkbox | 07/12/05
;-]  Colonel_Panic | 07/12/05
Or maybe you guys just started to think? (NT)  Vily Clay | 07/12/05
Nawwww we just agree for once (NT)  Squawkbox | 07/13/05
Is it because not all of reality is too painful to see? (NT)  Vily Clay | 07/13/05
Your kidding me!  monolith | 07/12/05
Really? Where is the money from the fines?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/12/05
I would want it!  The King's Servant | 07/12/05
Your overlooking something  osreinstall | 07/12/05
Then Why......  WarHippy | 07/12/05
Different Scenerio  osreinstall | 07/12/05
I was wrong once......  WarHippy | 07/13/05
On Versions  osreinstall | 07/13/05
Simply put, I don't believe it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/12/05
You are not required to belive me.  The King's Servant | 07/12/05
I would send you the file but....  The King's Servant | 07/12/05
WinAMP piggy backed on MS's codecs  osreinstall | 07/12/05
But if that is correct....  The King's Servant | 07/12/05
Gave you a couple reasons than missing  osreinstall | 07/12/05
So you didn't really read my post, did you?  The King's Servant | 07/13/05
Did you read mine?  osreinstall | 07/13/05
Let's read.  The King's Servant | 07/13/05
Your Unbelievable  osreinstall | 07/13/05
Why am I replying to you?  The King's Servant | 07/13/05
Because you want to argue instead of being honest.  osreinstall | 07/13/05
Here's a Suggestion....  WarHippy | 07/12/05
Now that CNN has removed the option of using any thing but WMP...  LoCal | 07/12/05
Did they remove the option of using any player...  The King's Servant | 07/13/05
Bwahahahahahaha :-D  LoCal | 07/13/05
You called?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 07/12/05
These darn EUeans, where do they find the nerve...  michael_t | 07/12/05
And then there's reality ...  lalogos | 07/12/05
Yeah, you did.  The King's Servant | 07/12/05
But, But, But, But......  WarHippy | 07/13/05
Do you really call what you just described as reality?  michael_t | 07/12/05
Time to put ALL monopolies to an END  IT-sys | 07/12/05
I like Monopoly  zappattazz@... | 07/12/05
Are you clueless?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/12/05
There is nothing illegal about being a monopoly...  LoCal | 07/12/05
There is when you pay...  Colonel_Panic | 07/12/05
Can't wait until Apple is onboard with Intel  Boot_Agnostic | 07/12/05
Yes, Apple is the ultimate monopoly.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/12/05
How can you be a monopoly...  tic swayback | 07/12/05
* They control 100% of their market. (NT)  The King's Servant | 07/12/05
Umm no, they are in two markets...  Colonel_Panic | 07/12/05
Nice try  tic swayback | 07/12/05
Name one other computer...  The King's Servant | 07/13/05
Sorry, it holds up pretty well  tic swayback | 07/13/05
What Will They Be.....  WarHippy | 07/13/05
I prefer....  tic swayback | 07/13/05
When you are called 'clueless'  michael_t | 07/12/05
I see Intel do this every day here  sscarfo | 07/12/05
AMD - DELL  mabricen | 07/12/05
Wait til this hits ZDNet  tic swayback | 07/12/05
Haven't I seen this somewhere else?  toomuchgreeatea@... | 07/12/05
"Nothing to see here. Move along!"  zappattazz@... | 07/12/05
just reading thru...try this:  brent1a | 07/12/05
PS-  brent1a | 07/12/05
IE cuts off the address halfway.  The King's Servant | 07/12/05
Hmmm....  tic swayback | 07/12/05
and  eLurker | 07/12/05
Links are valid  tic swayback | 07/12/05
Or try using Fx.  The King's Servant | 07/12/05
As does Safari, apparently (NT)  tic swayback | 07/12/05
i am  eLurker | 07/12/05
You couldn't paste the rest of the url like I did, here cry babies...  Colonel_Panic | 07/12/05
HA! HA! HA! HA!  WarHippy | 07/13/05
Can you turn off word wrap when you type URLs, please?  The King's Servant | 07/12/05
How?  tic swayback | 07/12/05
It is a function of the browser, not the forum.  The King's Servant | 07/12/05
i see  eLurker | 07/12/05
Yes, that is what I was saying but now...  The King's Servant | 07/12/05
Let's try again...  The King's Servant | 07/12/05
I see both of those as broken URL's  tic swayback | 07/12/05
AWW! Cmon you guys.....  WarHippy | 07/13/05
Sry tic, links no good  mamacat | 07/12/05
Cut and paste  tic swayback | 07/12/05
Actuall *LINKS* right here  toadlife | 07/12/05
Yep! Yep! Yep!  WarHippy | 07/13/05
We can tell who is using Konqeror...  Colonel_Panic | 07/12/05
This is an important collection of facts but  michael_t | 07/12/05
Gonna be fun  tic swayback | 07/13/05
This legal battles should  michael_t | 07/13/05
Rise of more EU facist!  Reverend MacFellow | 07/12/05
Hey Kunte, they don't take cr@p from the likes of...  Colonel_Panic | 07/12/05
hahaha you funny!  Reverend MacFellow | 07/12/05
I'm with ya on that one boy  michael_t | 07/12/05
DISTURBING INTEL NEEDS TO PRACTICE what honest business dosent dare do  samm_z | 07/12/05
One more reason why we DON'T need the EU  jbachandouris@... | 07/12/05
AMD gets a foothold in EU...  The King's Servant | 07/12/05
Good.  emcee_z | 07/12/05
By "They" I mean US officials, not EU  emcee_z | 07/12/05
I am willing to bet...  Rodo1 | 07/12/05
I dunno...  John L. Ries | 07/12/05
Raids sound a bit extreme, but...  John L. Ries | 07/12/05
Sensationalist reporting  deepee912 | 07/13/05
So Intel courting Linux/Open Source was all...  Colonel_Panic | 07/12/05
Not at all  John L. Ries | 07/13/05
All true, you caught me...  Colonel_Panic | 07/13/05
But consider this...  The King's Servant | 07/13/05
EU  Bobby Joe Reed | 07/12/05
Re: EU  Colonel_Panic | 07/12/05
I like the colonel... (No relevant text)  The King's Servant | 07/13/05
Intel turned to WWII??  GenRabbit@... | 07/12/05
My parting shot  Squawkbox | 07/12/05
You Don't Mean......  WarHippy | 07/13/05
CURB SERVICE!!!!!!!  Squawkbox | 07/13/05
You have a very valid point because...  Colonel_Panic | 07/13/05
Yeah! Let's celebrate!  The King's Servant | 07/13/05
Intel Compilers - Smoking Gun & Bullets  SamBirnbaum | 07/13/05
Hmmm.  John Zern | 07/13/05
LOL that Intel compilers are 'smoking gun'  Prognosticator | 07/13/05
Optimizing versus Breaking  tic swayback | 07/13/05
INTEL Compliers and benchmarks  SamBirnbaum | 07/13/05
WTHey?  The King's Servant | 07/13/05
Verrrrrrrry interesting, thanks for the...  Colonel_Panic | 07/13/05
Interesting about HP  John Zern | 07/13/05
So you didn't read the full complaint either, eh?  The King's Servant | 07/13/05
EU on the way out!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 07/13/05
I love to quote Kinte!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 07/13/05
AMD vs Intel  Howie8 | 07/13/05
They do.  emcee_z | 07/13/05

What do you think?

Click Here
advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here