On mySimon: Ultimate Box Sets!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Tom Krazit
Posted on ZDNet News: Jul 14, 2006 6:26:00 PM

Even Steven Spielberg's "E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial" didn't get these kind of reviews.

Independent chip reviewers across the Internet unveiled the results of their tests of Intel's upcoming Core 2 Duo processor for desktops, or the chip formerly known as Conroe. For the first time in several years, Intel has a clear performance lead in a wide variety of benchmarks for office applications, games and other software.

Back in February, before Intel had released details about the Core architecture used to build Conroe, Mooly Eden, vice president and general manager of Intel's Mobile Platforms group, claimed that, in general, the Core architecture chips would deliver a 20 percent performance lead over comparable chips from Advanced Micro Devices. While it's hard to assemble an overall figure based on dozens of benchmark results, the Core 2 Duo meets that target in some areas and comes in shy of that figure in others. But its lead was clear in the minds of reviewers, who did not hold back their praise for Intel's new chip.

CNET.com, which like CNET News.com is published by CNET Networks, said "the Core 2 Duo chips include not only the fastest desktop chips on the market, but also the most cost-effective and among the most power-efficient." Most reviewers evaluated three chips that will formally launch later this month: the Core 2 Extreme X6800, the Core 2 Duo E6700 and the E6600. The Extreme version runs at the fastest clock speed and costs a lot more than the E6700 and E6600, but it will be the most powerful desktop PC chip on the planet when it is released.

Anandtech, which was one of the sites that was granted access to a preproduction version of Conroe, declared that "Intel's Core 2 Extreme X6800 didn't lose a single benchmark in our comparison; not a single one." Even Intel's mainstream E6700 and E6600 processors beat AMD's highest-performing chip, the Athlon FX-62, in several benchmarks.

Sharky's Extreme, another hardware review site, was equally impressed with the new Core 2 Duo chips. "The launch of the Core 2 processor line has hit the market with a bang, and offers up an incredible combination of performance and value, coupled with low heat and power specifications. These processors are so good, that it's difficult to highlight any real negatives."

Core 2 Due outperforms

Hardware reviewers were overwhelmingly positive in their praise of Intel's upcoming Core 2 Duo chip. Here's a brief sampling:

"But make no mistake, what you see before you is not the power hungry, poor performing, non-competitive garbage (sorry guys, it's the truth) that Intel has been shoving down our throats for the greater part of the past five years. No, you're instead looking at the most impressive piece of silicon the world has ever seen, at the fastest desktop processor we've ever tested. What you're looking at is Conroe, and today is its birthday."
--Anandtech.com

"Intel once again has the fastest desktop processor on the market...If you're after the best performing desktop processor on the planet, you're going to be shopping for an Intel Core 2 processor." --Reg Hardware

"After years of wandering in the wilderness, Intel has recaptured the desktop CPU performance title in dramatic fashion." --The Tech Report

"For the first time in about two years, Intel is offering a superior desktop processor that may cause more than just a headache for AMD." --Tom's Hardware Guide

"There is no doubt that when it comes to editing video, manipulating images or encoding music, the Intel Core 2 Duo and Extreme processors at 2.66GHz and above currently enjoy a healthy performance advantage over AMD's Athlon FX and Athlon 64 line of processors. Moreover, I would be remiss if I did not mention the Core 2 Duo and Extreme also do a great job of making the Pentium 4 look like a dinosaur." --Hard OCP

On PC World's own benchmark, WorldBench, the E6700 processor outscored AMD's FX-62 processor by a substantial margin, and the gap was even wider between the FX-62 and the Core 2 Extreme. PC gamers, who have been solidly behind AMD's Athlon 64 processors almost since the day they were released, will have to rethink their stance based on some of the gaming benchmark figures, according to PCMag.com.

The language used to describe the Core 2 Duo chips was almost reverent, perhaps in part because it has been so long since Intel has been this competitive from a performance standpoint in the desktop PC market. Intel's Netburst chips, which the world knows as the Pentium 4 and Pentium D processors, trailed AMD's Athlon 64 chips on many of these same tests and also consumed a great deal more power than AMD's offerings. But the performance tide has turned, and the power consumption of the new processors meets or beats AMD's chips in tests done by several reviewers.

AMD is using 2006 to catch its breath after its surge over the last few years. The company isn't planning any major overhauls to its Athlon 64 X2 processors this year. But it has introduced support for faster DDR2 memory and announced plans to launch a gaming platform known as 4x4 that can accommodate two AMD processors such as its Athlon 64 X2 chips or its FX chips. AMD hasn't officially said which processors it will use in the 4x4 design. It's unclear whether that will be enough to overcome the performance of Conroe, but in 2007 AMD plans to make more sweeping changes to its processors, including support for quad-core designs.

Beneath all the critical praise, however, is the fact that most PC users won't be pushing their PCs near the limit of the Core 2 Duo's performance. For those who just like to check e-mail or manage their finances, most any processor will do. But gamers and multimedia enthusiasts are influential forces in the PC market, and praise from that demographic tends to carry over into the larger market.

Some of the reviews noted that AMD is about to cut prices on its desktop chips to keep pace with the Core 2 Duo. An AMD representative confirmed pricing changes are in the works. "AMD will perform an aggressive price move in July to ensure we maintain price-performance leadership in desktop products," the company said in a statement. Intel also plans to cut prices on its older Pentium D chips when the Core 2 Duo chips start to arrive later this month.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 107 Talkback(s)
HINT IT AIN'T AMD?? HINT, GET A BRAIN.
Moron. 2 years later I still don't see an "I'm Sorry, I was wrong, I loved AMD so much I only listened to things that made me feel good about being in love with AMD and I unfortunately allowed that l... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Cayble Posted on: 10/25/08  (Edited: 10/25/08 @ 04:42) You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Running Linux  Linux User 147460 | 07/14/06
Ram drives are available,  jheine | 07/14/06
Flash and MRAM around the corner though  D. W. Bierbaum | 07/17/06
2.5 Ghz Merom?  #_z | 07/14/06
I still have an AMD soft spot.  Henaway | 07/14/06
AMD, we knew ye well.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/06
Not at all  ITGuy04 | 07/14/06
The One. Two, Three KO.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/06
Then why is Intel still around?  ITGuy04 | 07/14/06
Then please explain...  bidemytime | 07/14/06
well...  doh123 | 07/15/06
And sleep they did for the better part of five years  zkiwi | 07/14/06
And they called them Knowledge Workers..  ValtielTV | 07/19/06
I will buy AMD unless there is a real compelling reason.  DonnieBoy | 07/15/06
I'll keep buying AMD  voska | 07/17/06
Not good enough  IceTheNet@... | 07/17/06
we'll see  CobraA1 | 07/16/06
So were are all the AMD fan boys and thier  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/06
The "fanboys"  OhMyGosh | 07/15/06
Both AMD and Intell have to compete and inovate.  DonnieBoy | 07/15/06
Ahem...  Linux_Fanboy | 07/15/06
Actually the new Intel Processors are ...  ShadeTree | 07/17/06
Very much so  Sparhawk_z | 07/18/06
It's Intels turn  voska | 07/17/06
AMD Fanboy here! what you need, Another Smak Down?  IceTheNet@... | 07/17/06
dude...  Sparhawk_z | 07/18/06
Message has been deleted.  Linux_Fanboy | 07/22/06
Reply to No_Ax_to_Grind  okiekid | 07/17/06
Nothing could match the HYPE that has been going on for a year...  realitycheck101 | 07/14/06
What is about to change?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/06
Sure AMD will change  voska | 07/17/06
Yeah  #_z | 07/14/06
Except for the arrogance...  flatliner | 07/14/06
Will enhance Vista eXPerience...  Mike Cox | 07/14/06
Will enhance OSXperience too!  Prognosticator | 07/14/06
Best of both worlds  tic swayback | 07/14/06
Smarter than the average bear (off topic, but juicy)....  yogeee | 07/14/06
Wow, that's fascinating! Hey can anybody tell me....  yogeee | 07/14/06
What a barrel of laughs Mike .  I'm Ye, the MS SHILL . | 07/14/06
Doh!  spammyman | 07/14/06
Fish on what dork !  Intellihence | 07/14/06
??????  John Zern | 07/14/06
Let out some line Mike, Let out some line!!!  John Zern | 07/14/06
He didn't hook anyone John Zern !  Intellihence | 07/14/06
Cut the line, Mike.  osreinstall | 07/14/06
ROTFLMAO  John Zern | 07/14/06
RE: What a barrel of laughs Mike .  richdave | 07/17/06
Wow looks exactly like the one you caught 2 weeks ago!  LoCal | 07/17/06
Mike.....  IanX | 07/15/06
Brilliant as always, Mike.  LoCal | 07/17/06
the Vista nobody will see... for a good two to three years  ValtielTV | 07/19/06
Does that mean Hector Ruiz will puke again?  Prognosticator | 07/14/06
Wanna bet MOST of those benchmarks..  Feldwebel Wolfenstool | 07/14/06
I was wondering when this might be suggested ... nt  IanX | 07/15/06
So what?  georgeou | 07/15/06
So AMD increases cache to 4Meg  swoopee | 07/15/06
Might help, but look at the big picture...  Cayble | 07/16/06
Your ignorance is showing....  techboy_z | 07/17/06
Seriously guy  Cayble | 07/17/06
Sure they can drop their price, but will they.  Bill F. | 07/18/06
Stop the lies...  techboy_z | 07/19/06
Fine. We will see Who is right.  Cayble | 07/20/06
I still don't see any apology; 2 years later.  Cayble | 10/25/08
Re. Inventory  techboy_z | 07/17/06
HINT IT AIN'T AMD?? HINT, GET A BRAIN.  Cayble | 10/25/08
If it was only that easy.  Prognosticator | 07/17/06
If it were that performance boosting..  punk4evr | 07/17/06
Ok someone else suggested  swoopee | 07/17/06
I'm impressed . . .  CobraA1 | 07/16/06
No, it Don't  fatrat | 07/17/06
20%?  ChazzMatt | 07/14/06
Failure to launch .... wink  michael_t | 07/14/06
Apples to Apples...  fizzmaster | 07/14/06
Iwant to see the next the server Intel  michael_t | 07/15/06
What chips that are due next week? (NT)  crampy20 | 07/15/06
next week s  michael_t | 07/15/06
Your a hoot Milky, but not in a funny way.  Cayble | 07/15/06
Maybe he  Linux User 147560 | 07/16/06
Maybe not funny, but he has a point  mds_z | 07/17/06
Dear mds_z, as you can see ZD "forums" are not  michael_t | 07/17/06
I agree: for Intel making a better processor is LIKE "curing cancer"...  michael_t | 07/17/06
Of course, the press is falling all over itself...  theblue1 | 07/15/06
Price? Availability?  shady28 | 07/15/06
Time for Intel PowerMacs  Fred Fredrickson | 07/17/06
Apple will come out the real winner here  daver_z | 07/27/06
it's the drive  raunchy | 07/17/06
about to change  raunchy | 07/17/06
Bzzztt! Wrong...  techboy_z | 07/17/06
Bzzzzzzzt!! Realy Wrong!!! Ha!  Cayble | 07/17/06
Just wait till November...  techboy_z | 07/19/06
Good. Keep it that way.  Cayble | 07/20/06
65 nm = possibly bad for AMD  timberline5 | 07/20/06
65 nm = possibly bad for AMD  timberline5 | 07/20/06
so what  raunchy | 07/17/06
tide will change  raunchy | 07/17/06
DUO CORE = Dual CPU of yesterday  chasster123 | 07/17/06
mabye so  raunchy | 07/17/06
price  raunchy | 07/17/06
So how do the commodity chips compare?  Sxooter_z | 07/17/06
"Several" benchmarks does not a majority make.  jgmsys@... | 07/17/06
GOSH!!!  richdave | 07/17/06
Core 2 Duo = 64???  marianne.popp@... | 07/17/06
Core 2 Duo = 64???  ajfaull@... | 07/27/06
I wonder...  cashaww | 07/17/06
Intel Dual-core  BALTHOR | 07/19/06
Nope.  timberline5 | 07/20/06
now MSFT will go bankrupt  daver_z | 07/27/06

What do you think?

Click Here
advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here