On TV.com: How to Save HEROES
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Stephen Shankland
Posted on ZDNet News: Jul 19, 2006 11:41:00 PM

Intel quad-core server and desktop processors will arrive this year instead of next, Chief Executive Paul Otellini said Wednesday, firing a new competitive volley against rival Advanced Micro Devices.

"We notified customers we're pulling in both the desktop and server (launch) of the first quad-core processors into the fourth quarter of this year from the first half of 2007," Otellini said. Intel's quad-core Xeon server processor is code-named Clovertown, and its desktop processor Kentsfield.

Intel quad-cores

Intel has been bruised financially in recent quarters, but is fighting to reverse market share losses. Both Intel and AMD now sell dual-core chips--those with two processing engines on a single slice of silicon--and are racing to bring multicore successors to market.

Chips with more cores can juggle multiple jobs simultaneously than single-core models. However, while server software typically is able to use multiple cores, most desktop computer software hasn't been adapted for the designs.

Intel's quad-core chips actually are packages consisting of two dual-core chips, but each package plugs into a single processor socket. AMD, whose quad-core chips are due in mid-2007, uses a more refined design with all the cores on a single slice of silicon.

Intel has advanced several schedules recently. Its "Woodcrest" Xeon chip for dual-processor servers went on sale in the second quarter instead of the fourth, and its "Tulsa" Xeon for four-processor servers also is arriving sooner. "We pulled in the Tulsa processor launch by two quarters to the third quarter and have begun shipping that product for revenue," Otellini said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 28 Talkback(s)
Yep...We gotta get used to Intel's pricing...
I hate the way how Intel prices E6600 to ~$315 where it beats $1031 (only with a bit of overclocking but still passed most of the benchmarks...).

Well, that's because of the fire sale... But still won't buy any processors from Intel...... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Grayson Peddie Posted on: 07/21/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
FUD and Quality Concerns  bitflippper1 | 07/19/06
At least your honest  Prognosticator | 07/19/06
I would choose...  John Zern | 07/19/06
Uh....no!  techboy_z | 07/20/06
What old product?  jheine | 07/20/06
Old products  John Zern | 07/20/06
Buwahahahaha, cry AMD cry...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/20/06
Why should they cry?....  techboy_z | 07/20/06
Read their P&L report, lots to cry about.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/20/06
Cluetrain...  techboy_z | 07/20/06
Large margin in size  John Zern | 07/20/06
Yet, the behemoth Intel pooped its pants when punny AMD offered Opterons  michael_t | 07/20/06
No_horse_to_beat at it again!  Reverend MacFellow | 07/21/06
Don't worry, AMD will be whipping their help also.  osreinstall | 07/20/06
I hope AMD will!  Grayson Peddie | 07/20/06
I hope they all compete to keep prices lower.  osreinstall | 07/20/06
The story is on the front page.  osreinstall | 07/20/06
Realitytrain  osreinstall | 07/20/06
Has Intel upgraded its "twin tower" MCH already?  michael_t | 07/19/06
what you say ?  not of this world | 07/19/06
I'll fill you in.  Prognosticator | 07/20/06
On the threshold of a revolution  Rodney Davis | 07/20/06
Intel, if you want to put AMD to ashes, how about this:  Grayson Peddie | 07/20/06
All cached up and nowere to read...  Robert Crocker | 07/20/06
Bunch of crock  Prognosticator | 07/20/06
core 2 duo is still a crunk of ****  Justin Carmichael | 07/21/06
core 2 duo is still a crunk of **** pt 2  Justin Carmichael | 07/21/06
Yep...We gotta get used to Intel's pricing...  Grayson Peddie | 07/21/06

What do you think?

SmartPlanet

Click Here