On mySimon: Wham-O Max Flight Glow Frisbee
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By John Borland
Posted on ZDNet News: Dec 8, 2004 2:41:00 AM

The head of the Federal Trade Commission sent a letter to Congress on Tuesday highlighting efforts that file-swapping companies are making to disclose potential online risks.

Legislators have criticized software such as Kazaa, Morpheus and eDonkey for exposing users to spyware, pornography and the risk of lawsuits. Although protesting that their software was no more risky than use of the Internet at large, peer-to-peer companies have worked with the FTC to develop better consumer notification techniques.

The FTC included several of those proposals with its letter to Congress, saying that when implemented, they would do a better job of warning consumers.

"(Peer-to-peer) industry members have developed proposed risk disclosures that we believe would be a substantial improvement over current practices," FTC Chair Deborah Platt Majoras wrote in the letter. "We intend to monitor and report back to interested members of Congress on the extent to which P2P file-sharing program distributors implement these proposed risk disclosures."

The letter follows a tumultuous year in Congress for file-swapping companies, which faced proposed legislation that would have overturned a series of court rulings to make them responsible for copyright infringement on their networks.

That legislation ultimately did not pass but could return next year.

Under the new proposals, consumers would be notified when the software is installed that downloading music, games, movies or software without authorization is illegal. The companies' Web sites would also have detailed information about other possible risks in using the software.

Representatives for file-swapping trade associations said the FTC letter could help show legislators that they are serious about playing by the rules.

"We are grateful for the interest that the Federal Trade Commission has taken in this young industry's efforts at self-regulation," Distributed Computing Industry Alliance Chief Executive Officer Marty Lafferty said in a statement. "We hope the FTC letter to Congress will help foster a better understanding on the Hill of the realities of P2P technologies and of the actions being taken by responsible parties to commercially develop this new distribution channel."

The FTC will hold a two-day session studying the consumer impacts of file-swapping technology beginning Dec. 15.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 45 Talkback(s)
Don't they work together?
I have heard that BG and GB are in this thing together, so take your pick. Suffice it to say that either of the two will be blamed for nearly everything wrong in the world today, or any day for that matter. wink... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Spoon Jabber Posted on: 12/09/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Microsoft Windows should also be required  bjbrock | 12/07/04
Stay On Topic  BlackDiamond | 12/08/04
His is on topic  Jeff Spicoli | 12/08/04
Not to mention...  amicus_curious | 12/08/04
Kazaa?  rapson | 12/08/04
Huh?  BlackDiamond | 12/08/04
It's all interconnected  rapson | 12/08/04
Ahhhhh  BlackDiamond | 12/08/04
Don't forget  Spoon Jabber | 12/08/04
Sorry  rapson | 12/08/04
Don't they work together?  Spoon Jabber | 12/09/04
if laws like this are put in place we will have warnings all over the place  JasonL31 | 12/08/04
Treating consumers as adults  tic swayback | 12/08/04
How many warnings are needed?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
Just one  tic swayback | 12/08/04
Whoa  rapson | 12/08/04
Personal responsibility???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
Truth, it's a meaningless smoke screen.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
It's more of a legal disclaimer situation  tic swayback | 12/08/04
All good questions, maybe a few answers.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
Severity of mis-use  tic swayback | 12/08/04
Let's take your point further.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
Your furthering my argument  tic swayback | 12/08/04
You simply don't know that.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
Proving a negative  tic swayback | 12/08/04
Now you are trying to base right and wrong on dollars?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
It's not about money, it's about severity of the crime  tic swayback | 12/08/04
Money in liew of facts...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
One more point tic...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
Who pays?  tic swayback | 12/08/04
You have an odd definition of hypocrisy  tic swayback | 12/08/04
Are you for real?!  Jeff Spicoli | 12/08/04
Man I was hoping someone would step in to it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
Gun locks not a good comparison  tic swayback | 12/08/04
You missed the point...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
You're not making the point  tic swayback | 12/08/04
Once more...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
Again, what good does that do?  tic swayback | 12/08/04
Let me turn it around...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
The truth is already out there  tic swayback | 12/08/04
Strawman argument.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
Heh heh, you said "pubics"  tic swayback | 12/08/04
YOU missed the point!  Jeff Spicoli | 12/08/04
Hmmm, I belivbe the courts are trying to decide this very matter.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/08/04
Poppycock  ParadigmOdyssey | 12/08/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here