On TV.com: 10 characters that need to be killed off
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Stefanie Olsen
Posted on ZDNet News: Dec 15, 2004 1:09:00 AM

A hoax e-mail circulating the Internet has millions of Americans scurrying to add their cell phones to a national Do Not Call list to avoid telemarketers.

The e-mail warns recipients that telemarketers will have new rights to call cell phones beginning Jan. 1, if people don't request anonymity by Wednesday. In the last week, 9.5 million people registered with the Do Not Call list, many as a result of the warning, according to its governing agency the Federal Trade Commission. The FTC typically fields up to 200,000 requests in a week, according to FTC spokeswoman Jen Schwartzman.

"People are panicked, and I think the only thing they got right in the e-mail is our Web site registration information," Schwartzman said.

The agency hasn't seen such volume since it introduced the service in July 2003. Schwartzman compared the current stampede to a 2002 frenzy that was sparked by an e-mail cautioning that personal financial data would be released to third parties.

Like many rumors, the current cell phone scare has a kernel of truth at its core. It was likely spawned by a new project called the Wireless 411 Service, which has been proposed by several major wireless phone carriers including AT&T Wireless. The service, expected to be available next year, will let people look up cell phone numbers the same way they look up numbers using the nationwide 411 directory service. But unlike the directory for home and business numbers, people must ask their wireless phone carrier to be included in the cellular directory and telemarketers won't have access to it.

Telemarketers are barred from calling cell phones under rules set by the FCC.

Backers of the 411 service recently sent out a press release to try to dispel rumors that this project would open people's cell phones to sales pitches.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 13 Talkback(s)
Correction: eWeek article was on 12/13/2004
The eWeek article was e-mailed and web-posted on 12/13/2004. Sorry for the error :>) (Read the rest)
Posted by: TCP?IP'ed Posted on: 12/15/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Break The Chain "Do Not Call"  ealbert1 | 12/14/04
Good info  htotten | 12/14/04
Thanks  Middle of the Road | 12/15/04
Exactly what you *don't* want to do  rpmyers1 | 12/14/04
You all fell for this hoax?  No__ | 12/14/04
Would___you___quit___impersonating___No_Ax! (NT)  PA-ITGuy | 12/15/04
What's a "scam" filter  Middle of the Road | 12/15/04
Scam Filter - Hint  EJHonda | 12/15/04
So how long does an FTC rule last?  jimmied43 | 12/15/04
The world is full of idiots...  shawkins | 12/15/04
And let's not leave out...  Confused by religion | 12/15/04
eWeek helped fuel the scam...  TCP?IP'ed | 12/15/04
Correction: eWeek article was on 12/13/2004  TCP?IP'ed | 12/15/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads