On mySimon: Award-Winning Fiction
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Stefanie Olsen
Posted on ZDNet News: Apr 19, 2005 9:24:00 PM

Google has sued Froogles.com, charging the rival shopping search engine with trademark infringement.

Mountain View, Calif.-based Google, the No. 1 search engine, filed a 68-page complaint against Froogles.com in the Eastern District Court of New York. The complaint alleges that Froogles.com proprietor Richard Wolfe, a New York state resident, illegally traded on Google's famous name and search brand for profit with a "nearly identical" mark.

"Upon information and belief, the defendant selected the mark Froogles with full knowledge of Google's prior rights in its Google name and mark," according to the filing. "As between the parties, Google is the senior user of marks that incorporate the formative--Oogle for Internet search services."

Google asked the court to shut down its rival and order transfer of the domain name, among other relief.

The case is only the latest legal showdown for Google, whose multibillion-dollar advertising and search business has become a wide target for complaints. The search giant faces several trademark infringement cases of its own, including complaints against its paid-search services in the United States and abroad.

The legal spat with Froogles.com goes back more than a year, when Wolfe filed a petition against approval for Google's trademark, Froogle, which was granted in February 2004. The search giant contends in the filing that its rival has instilled false doubt over Google's legal right to the shopping brand.

The proprietor of Froogles.com registered the Web address in December 2000, according to the filing, but did not use the domain for business until July 2002. Google claims that this was four years after it had secured rights to its Google trademarks. Froogles.com registered for a trademark for e-commerce related marketing services in September 2003.

For its part, Google filed a trademark application for Froogle in November 2002, and was granted the mark in February 2004.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 10 Talkback(s)
Not that simple.
This isn't just another Lindows vs Windows case. The key point and difference is in last two ?'s.

...Froogles.com registered for a trademark ...September 2003.

...Google filed a trad
... (Read the rest)
Posted by: doe_z Posted on: 04/20/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
So, who didn't see this one coming happy  BitTwiddler | 04/19/05
Wayback machine says Jan 25 2002  Nigel Johnstone | 04/19/05
Why not frugal Google?  Nigel Johnstone | 04/19/05
OMG i wonder..  internet411 | 04/19/05
frugal.google.com  Nigel Johnstone | 04/20/05
Google sales perhaps?  Nigel Johnstone | 04/20/05
Probably go better for Google if they took the Beta  FilledOut | 04/20/05
The little "TM" letters  j.m.galvin | 04/20/05
Oh No!  Protector | 04/20/05
Not that simple.  doe_z | 04/20/05

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More