On mySimon: Aspen Soft Bite Floppy Disc
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Declan McCullagh
Posted on ZDNet News: Jul 1, 2005 4:10:00 AM

The Bush administration announced Thursday that the U.S. government will not hand over control of the Internet to any other organization, a surprise move that could presage an international flap.

At the moment, the U.S. government maintains control of the Internet's "root"--the master file that lists what top-level domains are authorized--but has indicated in the past that it would transfer that responsibility to the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN.

The new principles, outlined by Assistant Commerce Secretary Michael Gallagher, say the U.S. government will "maintain its historic role in authorizing changes or modifications to the authoritative root zone file." In addition, the principles say, the U.S. government will continue to maintain "oversight" of ICANN and prevent its "focus" from straying from technical coordination.

Gallagher's blunt announcement to a wireless conference in Washington, D.C.--just a few days before ICANN's next meeting in Luxembourg--hints that the Bush administration would like to keep the Marina del Ray, Calif.-based nonprofit group on a short leash. ICANN has become the target of criticism as its budget has zoomed upward from $7 million in 2003 to around $16 million today.

Thursday's announcement also represents an effective snub to a United Nations process that is set to culminate in a summit in Tunisia in November. One gripe of the summit participants has been that poorer nations should have more say in the way the Internet is operated.

At one level, the Bush administration's announcement is largely symbolic: While in theory the United States can influence what country codes are permitted and who will run each, it's unlikely to make any procedural changes. But the more assertive tack promises to vex nations like Pakistan and Brazil that have been outspoken critics of the United States' influence online.

About five years ago, the Commerce Department told the European Commission that "these remaining powers retained by the United States DoC regarding ICANN should be effectively divested," according to a European government report.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 93 Talkback(s)
Ok, sorry to rain on your "OUR INTERNET" party but...
.. You guys are wrong. Plain wrong.
Once again the American version of history has forked from the real one.

As a British citizen, it is fairly insulting when I hear the plain garbage that "... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Scrat Posted on: 10/18/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Dear EU, quit being such p*ssies  Nigel Johnstone | 07/01/05
You are what you eat  Roger Ramjet | 07/01/05
I expect them to act in EU interests  Nigel Johnstone | 07/01/05
Forgotten what?  Roger Ramjet | 07/01/05
Dear Nigel--  Bill4 | 07/01/05
Put your argument  Nigel Johnstone | 07/01/05
My argument is put -  Not*A*Clue | 07/01/05
Yes we help each other  Nigel Johnstone | 07/01/05
France Willingly Helped The Nazis  RobertoSalazar | 07/01/05
And Roosevelt Was Too Much Of A Pvssy To Tell Stalin To Shove It  itanalyst | 07/01/05
Help - -  Not*A*Clue | 07/01/05
are you blind?  kckn4fun | 07/01/05
Sorry, we don't need the EU to help us  quietLee | 07/01/05
Well the UK then  Nigel Johnstone | 07/01/05
your argument is null  kckn4fun | 07/01/05
Nope - the frogs helped all right, but not in the way you posit  quietLee | 07/01/05
OK.....  Delmont | 07/01/05
Dear Nigel, it's ours  quietLee | 07/01/05
Whats the problem with EU controlling its root servers?  Nigel Johnstone | 07/01/05
Why should they?  quietLee | 07/01/05
On the contrary  Nigel Johnstone | 07/01/05
Uh, as you don't have an EU  quietLee | 07/01/05
far far less chance of that happening here than over there  Nigel Johnstone | 07/01/05
Why?  Delmont | 07/01/05
You would still control your root  Nigel Johnstone | 07/01/05
I don't care  Delmont | 07/01/05
The problem is there can be only one ...  ShadeTree | 07/05/05
The People of the EU are COWARDS  RobertoSalazar | 07/01/05
okay  Dave P. | 07/03/05
ICANN has always operated under ...  ShadeTree | 07/05/05
Finally, ONE thing I agree with Bush on  Prognosticator | 07/01/05
You go George!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 07/01/05
RE: You go George!  homebone | 07/01/05
You Go Homebone!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 07/01/05
If You Support Bush  itanalyst | 07/01/05
Wake-up, you are safer!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 07/01/05
Yeah, Ok  itanalyst | 07/01/05
Oh boy, the mighty PSS dragon comes out  quietLee | 07/01/05
please please  drunkQuebecer | 07/01/05
You Don't Know Your History Do You?  itanalyst | 07/01/05
Oh my, it's aluminum foil hat time  quietLee | 07/01/05
Message has been deleted.  itanalyst | 07/01/05
Not safer?  Delmont | 07/01/05
speaking of automatons  Dave P. | 07/03/05
Yes  quietLee | 07/01/05
You kidding?  FreeBSD | 07/01/05
You should read more and listen less  Dave P. | 07/03/05
can you smell it?  Dave P. | 07/03/05
YES!  Delmont | 07/01/05
nigel relax  toxicfreak | 07/01/05
I'm Already Learning Spanish and Chinese  itanalyst | 07/01/05
Just for you  James T. Kirk | 07/01/05
nobody will invade USA (please)  toxicfreak | 07/01/05
No, But I Know An Easy Way To Defeat Republican Majority  itanalyst | 07/01/05
Wow....  James T. Kirk | 07/01/05
i could write it in french  toxicfreak | 07/01/05
Nah, the smell would give it away as being Frog. (NT)  James T. Kirk | 07/01/05
Oh please  quietLee | 07/01/05
but since when we surrender ?  toxicfreak | 07/01/05
Remember a little gig called WWII  quietLee | 07/01/05
ho my mistake wrong country (canada)  toxicfreak | 07/01/05
Canada didn't surender to the German  voska | 07/04/05
This where a person speaking/writing in French could be from  voska | 07/04/05
Instead of bickering over language  voska | 07/04/05
Get a spell checker  Delmont | 07/01/05
OMG!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 07/01/05
Kool-aid in large quantities  quietLee | 07/01/05
I appologize!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 07/01/05
several points  pesky_z | 07/01/05
Mindless zealots  Protector | 07/01/05
So  James T. Kirk | 07/01/05
WRONG  itanalyst | 07/01/05
Well, look on the bright side  James T. Kirk | 07/01/05
Wrong  Delmont | 07/01/05
they have them too  vladsim | 07/11/05
Sigh.........  Protector | 07/01/05
nail on the head  Protector | 07/01/05
Actually what lead to the downfall of ...  ShadeTree | 07/05/05
I'll let John Quincy Adams explain it to you  Protector | 07/01/05
Re: So  none none | 07/03/05
no, but  vladsim | 07/11/05
We do participate in the world...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/02/05
and we thank you for it  Dave F_z | 07/03/05
Dear God, next  James Dean_z | 07/01/05
Find a better country, jerks!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 07/01/05
Dang Right!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 07/01/05
Never Thot I'd See the Day When I Agreed with Shrub...  tbbrickster_z | 07/01/05
tell them to start their own internet  xkmail | 07/01/05
The US started the Internet, The US is the largest  John Zern | 07/02/05
until a alternative is created  toxicfreak | 07/03/05
An alternative should be created  railgeek | 07/03/05
A probably silly question.......  Dave F_z | 07/03/05
Ok, sorry to rain on your "OUR INTERNET" party but...  Scrat | 10/18/05

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here