On CHOW: Can you use the handicapped bathroom?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Paul Festa
Posted on ZDNet News: Aug 11, 2005 12:08:00 AM

Signaling a new addition to the list of browser-specific Web sites, the U.S. Copyright Office solicited opinions on a planned Internet Explorer-only zone.

The office, a division of the Library of Congress, invited comments through Aug. 22 on an upcoming Web service for prospective copyright owners that may launch with support for only limited browsers.

"At this point in the process of developing the Copyright Office's system for online preregistration, it is not entirely clear whether the system will be compatible with Web browsers other than Microsoft Internet Explorer versions 5.1 and higher," the office said in its notice. "In order to ensure that preregistration can be implemented in a smoothly functioning and timely manner, the office now seeks comments that will assist it in determining whether any eligible parties will be prevented from preregistering a claim due to browser requirements of the preregistration system."

The Copyright Office's request for comments goes to the heart of the battle over Web market share and Web standards. Web standards advocates have long argued that inconsistencies in the way browser makers implement standards--that is, W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) recommendations--force Web developers to write different pages for individual browsers. Another concern is that Web page and application developers have to perform quality assurance testing multiple times for different browsers.

The Copyright Office site in question is a preregistration system for unpublished, commercial works-in-progress. Scheduled to launch Oct. 24, the system would let a film studio preregister a movie, for example, so that the studio could prosecute copyright violations that resulted from scenes or copies prematurely distributed over the Net before the work was complete.

In its request for comments, the office made clear that it plans to support other browsers in the future. In an interview, an attorney with the office said that the sticking point was Siebel software that guaranteed compatibility with only selected browsers--including both IE and Netscape 7.02, a browser with negligible market share--in the current Siebel 7.7 software.

The Copyright Office said it planned to upgrade to Siebel 7.8, which supports Netscape 7.2, Firefox 1.0.3 and Mozilla 1.7.7, but not in time for the Oct. 24 launch.

Neither the Copyright Office nor Siebel said they planned to support other browsers like Opera or Apple Computer's Safari.

Siebel defended its selective support of Web browsers.

"We're running a business, and testing is extremely costly," said Stacey Schneider, director of technology product marketing. "We optimize against what our customers demand. For Siebel 7.8, it became clear, especially for the government sector, that there's demand for Mozilla. But there are hundreds of vendors out there with their own browsers. And not many applications support many more than what we do."

The Copyright Office said original comments and five copies should be mailed to Copyright GC/ I&R, P.O. Box 70400, Southwest Station, Washington, D.C. 20024-0400.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 99 Talkback(s)
The falut lies with the Authority, not the contractee.
It matters not who the contractor is. The Copyright Office is responsible for making access available to ALL. If they contract the matter to another, they still must require that the contractor provid... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Update victim Posted on: 08/12/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Standards-based development is the key  twriter | 08/10/05
Reread the article; waiting for Siebel  Anton Philidor | 08/11/05
Read the post: stupid decision  Fred Fredrickson | 08/11/05
Standards are irrelevant to the problem.  Anton Philidor | 08/11/05
Restricting Access To Government Sites to IE Browser  nightwalker | 08/10/05
Can they make it any more obvious who they're cheerleading?  Jeff Spicoli | 08/10/05
They using Siebel software....Jeff!  computer_man | 08/11/05
Tell me you are kidding?  rob@... | 08/10/05
No, it's not the same government.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 08/10/05
Red Hat  IT_User | 08/11/05
Isn't it ironic?  X Marks The Spot | 08/10/05
Different Government...  BitTwiddler | 08/11/05
Is it all that differnt?  voska | 08/11/05
Government has NEVER been for the AVERAGE person. (NT)  Update victim | 08/11/05
Very valid points  BitTwiddler | 08/11/05
4 previous posts to this one  Squawkbox | 08/10/05
Maybe they should test  John L. Ries | 08/10/05
Siebel probably did test.  Anton Philidor | 08/11/05
That's not what it said  John L. Ries | 08/11/05
The evidence  John L. Ries | 08/11/05
Very specialized program.  Anton Philidor | 08/11/05
Maybe  John L. Ries | 08/11/05
Fire the designers  Yensi717 | 08/10/05
*sniff* *sniff* Smells like .NET  Chad_z | 08/11/05
Does this mean...  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 08/10/05
yup  Jeff Spicoli | 08/10/05
Say...  X Marks The Spot | 08/10/05
Yes, you do  Real World | 08/11/05
RE: Yes, you do  Linux User 147560 | 08/11/05
Not so much  Real World | 08/11/05
Interstate  Louisiana oilman | 08/11/05
... ahm Noticed the transportation bill...  Anton Philidor | 08/11/05
Absolutely  vferrara | 08/11/05
RE: Does this mean...  Linux User 147560 | 08/11/05
Terrible  richman555 | 08/10/05
Don't just talk about it...  dzash2000 | 08/11/05
I'm going to write a message  Qbt | 08/10/05
IE only  gerryrains@... | 08/10/05
don't feed the very lame attempt at trolling(NT)  Monkey_MCSE | 08/10/05
Not Ok  richman555 | 08/10/05
time for them to be put under the ACID test!#$%  Jeff Spicoli | 08/10/05
Back it up  dzash2000 | 08/11/05
troll trash  Jeff Spicoli | 08/10/05
Hmm..  X Marks The Spot | 08/10/05
re mike coxing  Llandros Loressin | 08/11/05
Wow. Could you repeat that, and use English this time?  James T. Kirk | 08/11/05
Here's my translation  voska | 08/11/05
Hahahaha  DrDoug018 | 08/11/05
Who better to spot a troll  voska | 08/11/05
You think I'm a troll?  DrDoug018 | 08/11/05
No we think you're a genius  Jeff Spicoli | 08/11/05
Whew! I feel better.  DrDoug018 | 08/11/05
You WILL be paranoid when..  Jeff Spicoli | 08/11/05
IE for Mac will not work  georgep_z | 08/11/05
Not my worry...  dzash2000 | 08/11/05
OK, guys . . . It's now time to file our comments with the patent office...  Plain Logic | 08/10/05
we will TROUNCE the patent office!!!  Jeff Spicoli | 08/10/05
ride avder we ged dunn TrOuNziNG-da cob-eereight oveezzzz!!!!!!  Jeff Spicoli | 08/10/05
Y-Yes sir!  X Marks The Spot | 08/10/05
Absolutely  dzash2000 | 08/11/05
But, I don't use I.E. which means that itis very expensive.  Update victim | 08/11/05
Re: Copyright Office poll: IE-only OK?  none none | 08/10/05
That's right it make very good sense !  michael_t | 08/10/05
Oh they got the memo,  Scrat | 08/11/05
yeah, who cares about 6.1%  woot! | 08/11/05
Or, to put it correctly  Scrat | 08/11/05
Or, to straighten out your crooked thoughts,  michael_t | 08/11/05
You obviously need to look up defacto in ...  ShadeTree | 08/12/05
I thought that 100% ARE citizens of this country  michael_t | 08/11/05
IE-only world sucks  node357 | 08/11/05
Very true  dzash2000 | 08/11/05
Re: Copyright Office poll: IE-only OK?  Scrat | 08/11/05
Twitching? YEP, right to my Senators and congressman  Update victim | 08/11/05
Oh dear...another wannabe...  Scrat | 08/11/05
ERROR ERROR ERROR !!! Read my post scratty  Update victim | 08/12/05
Re: IE -only OK? NOT!!!  dcannell | 08/11/05
Message has been deleted.  itanalyst | 08/11/05
Message has been deleted.  itanalyst | 08/11/05
I find it telling that the ONLY Browser banned  James Dean_z | 08/11/05
you now have a cause  dzash2000 | 08/11/05
Better choice - PROHIBIT using I.E. (NT)  Update victim | 08/11/05
Message has been deleted.  BuckFush | 08/11/05
IE only  rvgreen@... | 08/11/05
Bad software selection on the gov't's part  doctormoriarty | 08/11/05
Siebel only; not IE only  Anton Philidor | 08/11/05
The falut lies with the Authority, not the contractee.  Update victim | 08/12/05
Fire the Perverted Contractor  dzash2000 | 08/11/05
IE exclusivity  becabill@... | 08/11/05
Got a call from my Rep, & their DC office today, they want our letters  educateme@... | 08/11/05
Asking them not to open the site?  Anton Philidor | 08/11/05
Better the site stay closed til ready, we are not guinea pigs  educateme@... | 08/11/05
Principle or effectiveness.  Anton Philidor | 08/11/05
If all systems were running IE it would be OK, thats why I cant imagine it  educateme@... | 08/11/05
I agree that Siebel has full control...  Anton Philidor | 08/12/05
Bring a Law Suit  RobertoSalazar | 08/11/05
Limiting the customer base?  BigeCSGuy | 08/11/05
In other news, the Sessions of the US Congress  michael_t | 08/11/05
Typical Gov't employee thinking!  Reverend MacFellow | 08/12/05
How about replacing all proprietary software with open sourced  Boot_Agnostic | 08/12/05

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here