On TechRepublic: 10 dying IT skills
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Declan McCullagh
Posted on ZDNet News: Mar 2, 2006 8:14:00 PM

Digital radio receivers without government-approved copy-prevention technology likely would become illegal to sell in the future, according to new federal legislation announced Thursday.

Rep. Mike Ferguson, a New Jersey Republican, said his bill--which would enforce a so-called "broadcast flag" for digital and satellite audio receivers--was necessary to protect the music industry from the threat of piracy.

What's digital radio?
Satellite radio was last year's big thing. With a monthly subscription from either XM Radio or Sirius, you can get hundreds of uncensored channels. And yes, one of those is Howard Stern.

Consumer electronics makers are hoping 2006 will be the year of HD Radio. Like satellite radio, HD Radio requires a special receiver. Unlike satellite radio, though, it picks up digital signals transmitted over the same frequencies that FM radio uses. Many are commercial-free.

CNET has reviewed the Boston Acoustics Recepter Radio HD and the Yamaha RX-V4600.

Ferguson's proposal would grant the Federal Communications Commission the power to enforce "prohibitions against unauthorized copying and redistribution" for both digital over-the-air radio and digital satellite receivers.

"With exciting new digital audio devices on the market today and more on the horizon, Congress needs to streamline the deployment of digital services and protect the intellectual property rights of creators," said Ferguson, who is a member of the House of Representatives' Internet subcommittee. Rep. Mary Bono, a California Republican, is one of the four other co-sponsors.

Without explicit authorization from Congress, the FCC can't get away with mandating an audio broadcast flag on its own. That's because a federal appeals court last year unceremoniously rejected a similar set of regulations from the FCC, saying the agency did not have authority to mandate a broadcast flag for digital video.

At a breakfast roundtable with reporters on Thursday, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) said some sort of legislation is necessary to prevent Americans from saving high-quality music from digital broadcasts, assembling a "personal music library" of their own, and redistributing "recorded songs over the Internet or on removable media."

Devices like the Sirius S50, the RIAA worries, can record satellite radio broadcasts but aren't required to include digital rights management limitations.

But the RIAA and Ferguson may face an uphill battle in Congress. At a hearing in January, some senators expressed concern that an audio flag would infringe on traditional notions of fair use rights, and the politically powerful National Association of Broadcasters also urged caution on the audio flag.

The recording industry is worried about a new generation of digital radio and satellite services that send high-quality digital signals along with the associated metadata--song title and artist, for example. Some of the new devices include hard drives that allow these songs to be archived and played back later, and some, such as the popular Sirus S50, can also be connected to a computer.

The satellite radio companies have grappled with the issue of unauthorized copying in the past, although there is little or no evidence showing that their networks have helped seed file-swapping networks or other piracy hubs. XM Satellite Radio pulled a PC version of its receiver off the market in 2004, when an independent company created a tool that let songs be archived on the computer's hard drive.

CNET News.com's John Borland contributed to this report.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 19 Talkback(s)
ROYALTY FEES
We already pay to a socalled royalty fund anytime we buy recording equipment or recording media.
This was by act of congress and how soon they forget, since they are republican and are for big buss... (Read the rest)
Posted by: RKRSULIC Posted on: 03/13/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Is it because they think not better than ? (listen & watch what you listen)  Vily Clay | 03/02/06
Nah  5th Limb in the Kisser | 03/02/06
"There's some good in this world and it's worth fighting for" ...  Vily Clay | 03/02/06
Intelligent people know that it is recording equipment that prevents copy  FirstNLastN | 03/02/06
STUPID AND UNNECESSARY  opensourcepro | 03/02/06
RIAA hat in hand  jsjag1 | 03/02/06
AMEN!  dhmidhi | 03/03/06
Just do it.  Anthony S. | 03/02/06
Not Even Fair Use Here  Edward Meyers | 03/02/06
Record Industry  jsjag1 | 03/02/06
Worse, worse, worse... Violating the fair use of rights...  Grayson Peddie | 03/02/06
Remember: Vote Republican  gordon@... | 03/02/06
The U.S. needs more laws ?  NotRichandFamous | 03/03/06
The Patriot act killed all civil liberties, but it wasn?t enough for them.  Vily Clay | 03/03/06
Can you bring yourself to propose  Update victim | 03/03/06
It looks like you are a novice here and never read my posts before.  Vily Clay | 03/03/06
Yes, but they must be written by representatives who  Update victim | 03/03/06
they need to outlaw all recording devices  dhmidhi | 03/03/06
ROYALTY FEES  RKRSULIC | 03/13/06

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More