On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Elinor Mills
Posted on ZDNet News: Nov 8, 2006 4:10:00 AM

SAN FRANCISCO--Google is targeting the neo-network computer, not Microsoft, with all the Web-based applications it is releasing, Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt said at the Web 2.0 Summit here Tuesday.

Contrary to popular perception, applications such as Google's Docs & Spreadsheets are not designed to compete directly with Microsoft's desktop Office applications and suite, he said in a session dubbed "a conversation."

Eric Schmidt Eric Schmidt

"We don't position it as an office suite," Schmidt said. "We position it as something you use casually...It's a different way of managing information."

Beyond enabling people to access information from any device, anywhere, Google's products are free; Microsoft's applications are stored on the desktop and are not free, he added.

Google's applications rely on the storage of data on servers in the "cloud," which was the premise of network computing, he said. The proliferation of broadband Internet connections and reliable server farms means that the mid-1990s dream of network computing--promulgated by his former employer, Sun Microsystems, and Oracle--can finally come to fruition, Schmidt said.

The network computer at that time "didn't really work," he said. "Finally, now the architecture works."

"Fundamentally, it's better to keep your money in the bank than in your pocket," Schmidt said, adding that the metaphor could be applied to keeping your software on the server.

Schmidt was asked if Google bought video-sharing site YouTube because Google Video was not successful. Even though Google Video was "doing extraordinarily well," YouTube's business "was growing even faster," he said. Google plans to keep YouTube as a separate property, Schmidt added, citing YouTube's established user base and "viral component."

The Google chief denied a rumor that Google set aside nearly $500 million of the $1.65 billion purchase price to cover copyright-related legal costs. Google is talking with the big media companies to discuss the complicated issue, he said.

Schmidt said he would like users to be able to export their search histories between different search engines. "We want to give you essentially the equivalent of number portability," he said.

Google respects the rights of its users foremost, Schmidt said. "As long as we don't do something against their interests, we should be fine," he said. "The more that we can, for example, let people move their data around...and not trap it," the better.

Google is moving aggressively into new areas where advertising can be sold via its popular auction platform, Schmidt said. "We are investing very heavily in radio," he said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 28 Talkback(s)
Yeah, you're right, I must be stupid
Like I said before: Banks are regulated in part by the government, and rules can and will be added to force banks to make the data secure. Plus why should I withdrawl my money, my accounts are FDIC in... (Read the rest)
Posted by: John Zern Posted on: 11/09/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Yes, just like we trust banks to keep our money, we will trust service  DonnieBoy | 11/07/06
It's speed more than security  LordLiverpool | 11/08/06
For some applications, there is already very little difference, for others,  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
So, let me get this straight  John Zern | 11/08/06
Web applications will NEVER be the resource hog that Vista is, but sure,  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
eventually is the key word here  April May | 11/08/06
For many, applications, the infrastructure is here now. Take  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
Sorry, I don't buy it....  wjkahlssmd@... | 11/08/06
You had better RUN to your bank right now and withdraw ALL of your money.  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
You miss the point  John Zern | 11/08/06
Wow, since when did Governnent control and insurance solve all porblems in  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
That's just not accurate  April May | 11/08/06
You seem to think that everyone with a digital camara wants to spend hours  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
The bank analogy just doesn't work  April May | 11/08/06
Just get over it, we trust companies all the time. Have you ever flown in  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
Leaky abstraction  LordLiverpool | 11/08/06
You have given reasons for caching data locally, but NO reason for not  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
You may have answered your own question.  John Zern | 11/08/06
Do you not realize that you banking information is also online???  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
Yeah, you're right, I must be stupid  John Zern | 11/09/06
But how will they move the data?  April May | 11/08/06
I don't suppose you ever heard of the technology called "encryption". Do  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
Well,  April May | 11/08/06
It was in the news recently that Google is working on the offline problem,  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
The data is not accurate  Linux User 1 | 11/08/06
Google wants data in the cloud, not on the desktop  Loverock Davidson | 11/08/06
Who cares where Google wants my data.  osreinstall | 11/08/06
I see Big Brother's hand at work... up Google's arse.  Mr. Roboto | 11/08/06

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc