On CNET: The Dark Knight IMAX
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By David Meyer, ZDNet (UK)
Posted on ZDNet News: Jan 7, 2008 8:09:00 AM

Google has filed a patent for the recognition and use of text contained in images and videos.

The application, made in June 2007, was published on Thursday and covers "methods, systems and apparatus including computer program products for using extracted image text," according to Google.

"In one implementation, a computer-implemented method is provided," reads the abstract for the application. "The method includes receiving an input of one or more image-search terms and identifying keywords from the received one or more image search terms. The method also includes searching a collection of keywords including keywords extracted from image text, retrieving an image associated with extracted image text corresponding to one or more of the image-search terms, and presenting the image."

Google, which is already the proprietor of not only the most widely used image search facility on the Internet but also the leading video site, YouTube, has much to gain from being able to correctly interpret text held within images and video. Such a capability could, for example, be used to create more accurate keywords or for the automatic tagging of files and the identification of where a picture was taken based on signage in the background.

However, on Monday a company spokesperson offered Google's standard reply to questions regarding patent applications. "We file patent applications on a variety of ideas that our employees come up with," said the spokesperson. "Some of those ideas later mature into real products or services, some don't. Prospective product announcements should not necessarily be inferred from our patent applications."

The patent application is not the first time Google has delved into the world of optical character recognition, a technology currently used mostly for scanning documents into word-processor-friendly formats.

In September 2006 the company helped debug an old OCR engine called Tesseract--originally developed by Hewlett-Packard--and released it as open source. At the time, Google also quietly mentioned that it was eager to hire "top-notch OCR engineers."

David Meyer of ZDNet UK reported from London.

©2007 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. CNET , CNET.com , and the CNET logo are registered trademarks of CNET Networks, Inc. Used by permission.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 23 Talkback(s)
patent DENIED, prior art confirmed. (jpeg standards?) clear example of
throwing mud at the wall to see if it sticks.

if this patent is granted it will prove once and for all that the patent system is busted.

i can see a copyright on the specific code used.<... (Read the rest)
Posted by: wessonjoe Posted on: 01/11/08 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Oh Google, you're so grand and growing Boot_Agnostic   | 01/07/08
You know what they say... ezflow321   | 01/07/08
RE: Google applies for image text patent Loverock Davidson   | 01/07/08
So... ezflow321   | 01/07/08
So Loverock Davidson   | 01/08/08
what kind of patent is this? Linux Geek   | 01/07/08
This MUST be a sure case of 'PIOR ART' as optical hkommedal   | 01/07/08
Heck, My first OCR program worked off of images... tkepner   | 01/09/08
Yeah. ezflow321   | 01/07/08
RE: Google applies for image text patent GeneBuettner   | 01/07/08
RE: oligopoly is the name of the game Don't Ask Me   | 01/07/08
to all you google haters: trentyn.c@...   | 01/07/08
OCR is not at all new. Both in, on and inside images hkommedal   | 01/07/08
Agreed. ezflow321   | 01/07/08
RE: Google applies for image text patent atari8bit@...   | 01/07/08
The patent should be invalidated. Please invalidate them. Grayson Peddie   | 01/07/08
Invalidate who? ezflow321   | 01/07/08
All patents must die [nt] Omch'Ar   | 01/07/08
RE: Google applies for image text patent kkrys   | 01/08/08
Google applies to replace Micro$oft richardpmclaughlin@...   | 01/09/08
RE: Google applies for image text patent zdnet@...   | 01/09/08
Why didn't I think of that? 3dguru   | 01/11/08
patent DENIED, prior art confirmed. (jpeg standards?) clear example of wessonjoe   | 01/11/08

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement