On mySimon: Snuggle with the Snuggie
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ingrid Marson
Posted on ZDNet News: Jun 2, 2005 4:33:00 PM

Microsoft has drawn some criticism after confirming that it will not make the next version of Internet Explorer available to users of its Windows 2000 operating system.

In a blog posting at the end of last week, a Microsoft employee confirmed that the company would not be releasing IE 7 for Windows 2000, as this would involve a lot of work for an operating system that is in the later stages of its lifecycle.

"It should be no surprise that we do not plan on releasing IE 7 for Windows 2000. One reason is where we are in the Windows 2000 lifecycle. Another is that some of the security work in IE 7 relies on operating system functionality in XP SP2 that is non-trivial to port back to Windows 2000," according to the blog posting.

Although Windows 2000 will be supported until 2010, at the end of June of this year Microsoft will no longer accept requests for design changes or new features for the operating system.

A number of Microsoft blog readers were unhappy to learn that IE 7 would be unavailable on Windows 2000.

One reader, known as Garry, said it was contradictory for Microsoft to offer support for Windows 2000 until 2010, but not to offer its users an up-to-date browser.

"An important point, as I see it, is that Microsoft is committed to provided extended support to Windows 2000 through 2010. I consider that (an) acknowledgement by Microsoft that businesses and consumers will be using Windows 2000 until at least that time, however, come 2010 they will still be using IE 6 SP1 which will surely be obsolete by that time," said Garry.

Microsoft was also criticized for building a Web browser that cannot run independently of the operating system.

"What kind of silliness is this--to build an insecure Web browser that is so tightly screwed into the nitty gritties of an operating system that it can neither benefit from the updates made to itself on another flavor of the same operating system, nor can it be taken out of the operating system," said one posting.

IE 7, which will be available in beta this summer, will offer improved security features and basic tabbed browsing. It is also expected to offer improved standards support, including enhanced support for CSS 2 and PNG transparencies.

Ingrid Marson of ZDNet UK reported from London.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 129 Talkback(s)
Pages not working in Firefox
There are links from Firefox's site to report sites that do not work in Firefox. The more these companies are pressured into creating fully compliant HTML pages (instead of pages that were designed on... (Read the rest)
Posted by: pierrejvr Posted on: 06/07/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Why, Sure!  BitTwiddler | 06/02/05
Wrong conclusion.  ShadeTree | 06/02/05
Not a standard from what I've seen  voska | 06/02/05
Name one software company that...  ShadeTree | 06/03/05
Tow the M$ party line  DarthRidiculous | 06/02/05
Finished with the rant?  ShadeTree | 06/03/05
Price of entry?  Jay Cash | 06/03/05
Microsoft does not set standards.. It sets degrees of evilness.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 06/02/05
If the future is Linux, then what is today?(nt)  ShadeTree | 06/03/05
Right Conclusion  Squawkbox | 06/02/05
Everybody claims their new version is better ...  ShadeTree | 06/03/05
OK I Shade I won't just cause you said so  Squawkbox | 06/03/05
Ok...  Wolfie2K3 | 06/03/05
Do your self and me a favor wufwuf2k3.  Squawkbox | 06/03/05
You mean you didn't ...  ShadeTree | 06/03/05
Right conclusion - part 2  Fred Fredrickson | 06/05/05
Hmm...  thetargos | 06/02/05
MS will change their tune really quick if Firefox adoption on Win2000  DonnieBoy | 06/02/05
Windows 2000 and IE 7  ju1ce | 06/02/05
"Forced upgrades" only if a company cares about security.  Anton Philidor | 06/02/05
Tis a mistake IMHO  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/02/05
Reason enough to jump browsers  nucrash | 06/02/05
LOL, you make it sound like MS cared in the past for it's users..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 06/02/05
You forget that MS will be desperate to get a critical mass of users to use  DonnieBoy | 06/02/05
That would be if Linux was worth migrating to  John Zern | 06/02/05
By what criteria?  IT_User | 06/02/05
They also care about corporate users.  DonnieBoy | 06/02/05
Says you  Linux User 147560 | 06/02/05
Any IT manager who decides to switch  mustangj36@... | 06/02/05
Its the porkies...  Fred Fredrickson | 06/05/05
Correct  John L. Ries | 06/02/05
No great loss  DarthRidiculous | 06/02/05
You hit the bullseye  alterego_z | 06/02/05
It's the old greedy "force you to upgrade" Microsoft tactic..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 06/02/05
Firefox, with 1/100 of the resources, and they have no problem with Win2000  DonnieBoy | 06/02/05
That is THE most important point to me:  Judas I. | 06/02/05
I imagine they have sever spagetti code problems as well.  DonnieBoy | 06/02/05
Microsoft's fundamental problem  gordon@... | 06/02/05
And Firefox IS innovated?  John Zern | 06/02/05
Except...  IT_User | 06/02/05
Yeah and it is the  Linux User 147560 | 06/02/05
If you wanted tabbed browsing...  Anton Philidor | 06/02/05
In other words  Linux User 147560 | 06/02/05
Better words.  Anton Philidor | 06/03/05
I'd say it was more they complacent  voska | 06/03/05
Nothing made by humans works perfectly.  Anton Philidor | 06/03/05
Anton  IT_User | 06/03/05
Now that you mention it...  Linux User 147560 | 06/04/05
Thanks for describing why a monopoly is anti-innovative!  CobraA1 | 06/04/05
No big surprise  IT Scion | 06/02/05
Product differentiation  Anton Philidor | 06/02/05
The other main reason to encourage upgrades...  Anton Philidor | 06/02/05
It must be very hard  michael_t | 06/02/05
A shrewd plan or a MS miscalculation?  the_fiddler_on_the_roof | 06/02/05
MS miscalculation  John L. Ries | 06/02/05
Gamble  IT_User | 06/03/05
Definitely a shrewd plan.  Anton Philidor | 06/02/05
How many...  John L. Ries | 06/03/05
How will IE 7 drive people away?  Anton Philidor | 06/03/05
Unfortunately, you're right  trlauer | 06/03/05
You make some good points.  Anton Philidor | 06/03/05
Pages not working in Firefox  pierrejvr | 06/07/05
I'm not so sure of that  voska | 06/03/05
Third party software for IE...  Anton Philidor | 06/03/05
Only problem I've seen with 3rd party stuff  voska | 06/03/05
Re: How many...  MepisLINUXuser | 06/05/05
Re: How many...  pierrejvr | 06/07/05
so ?  M_c | 06/02/05
really?  bluestreak_z | 06/02/05
Way too funny  Richard Flude | 06/02/05
Hey, if Sun can keep up with the Solaris flavors  FilledOut | 06/02/05
Seriously- IE doesn't work on my win2k now  maxo_z | 06/02/05
Good!  michael_t | 06/02/05
huh?  bluestreak_z | 06/05/05
It doesn't matter, I am happy with IE5.  pa2004 | 06/02/05
at lest you think so....  DarbyOhara | 06/03/05
Ahum,, png transparancies e.t.c  pj-xmesh | 06/02/05
want, want, want.  trm1945 | 06/02/05
2k is NT 5.0, XPlode is NT 5.1, WTF is the...  MepisLINUXuser | 06/02/05
Here is a conundrum, if you can't try IE7...  MepisLINUXuser | 06/02/05
And I remember the good ol' days when MS said...  HypnoToad | 06/02/05
Ummmm, no...  MepisLINUXuser | 06/02/05
Just one site of many...  MepisLINUXuser | 06/02/05
Who wants to bet Firefox won't run in Laghorn?  MepisLINUXuser | 06/02/05
It will run On Longhorn.  Anton Philidor | 06/02/05
If the lockout Firefox...  DarthRidiculous | 06/02/05
They don't have to lock out FireFox...  Anton Philidor | 06/03/05
Locking out MUCH easier  Jay Cash | 06/03/05
I dunno  Linux User 147560 | 06/02/05
From whom have they heard about Longhorn?  Anton Philidor | 06/03/05
Not from me...  Linux User 147560 | 06/03/05
Not upgrading to Longhorn.  Anton Philidor | 06/03/05
Answer  Linux User 147560 | 06/03/05
Easy is hard enough.  Anton Philidor | 06/03/05
RE: Easy is hard enough  Linux User 147560 | 06/03/05
RE: Easy is hard enough  Linux User 147560 | 06/03/05
Anyone using Longhorn is more likely to be whipping the dashboard  balsover | 06/03/05
This is what we have been saying!  Linux User 147560 | 06/03/05
New demands on the hardware.  Anton Philidor | 06/03/05
What does this mean?  IT_User | 06/03/05
It means  Jay Cash | 06/03/05
Another change in Longhorn(?)  Anton Philidor | 06/04/05
Anton I find it funny  Linux User 147560 | 06/04/05
Underlying assumptions  IT_User | 06/04/05
It means Microspy will accomplish what...  MepisLINUXuser | 06/05/05
The other main reason to encourage upgrades...  Anton Philidor | 06/02/05
GET A LIFE  LWEM | 06/03/05
Hard bargainers.  Anton Philidor | 06/03/05
Who's whining?  John L. Ries | 06/03/05
"Disinterest"?  Anton Philidor | 06/03/05
Oh dear  John L. Ries | 06/04/05
Active X for firefox  support@... | 06/03/05
Active X for Firefox is a really bad idea  balsover | 06/03/05
I think they died  nucrash | 06/03/05
Bah, drop your stupid ActiveX dependency.  CobraA1 | 06/04/05
M$ can take their OS and IE and stick it for all i care!  wessonjoe | 06/03/05
Who cares!  kmsilver | 06/03/05
I love the *cough* unbiased opinions  dodge_spirit | 06/03/05
RE: I love the *cough* unbiased opinions  Linux User 147560 | 06/03/05
whatever  CobraA1 | 06/04/05
I'm not complaining.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 06/05/05
Find Software Off the shelf . . .  ebrke | 06/06/05
The smell of coffee...  Scrat | 06/03/05
Your point would be correct if...  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 06/05/05
" that is non-trivial to port back to Windows 2000"  CobraA1 | 06/04/05
But then again, you're not using the OS  FilledOut | 06/04/05
Not to worry!  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 06/05/05
Your point would be correct if...  Scrat | 06/06/05
oopsy on the previous post  bluestreak_z | 06/05/05

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here