On CHOW: The right way to cook BACON
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Suzanne Tindal, ZDNet Australia
Posted on ZDNet News: Nov 27, 2007 5:13:00 AM

New tests have revealed that Windows XP with the beta Service Pack 3 has twice the performance of Vista, even with its long-awaited Service Pack 1.

Vista's first service pack, to be released early next year, is intended to boost the operating system's performance. However, when Vista with the Service Pack 1 (SP1) beta was put through benchmark testing by researchers at Florida-based software development company Devil Mountain Software, the improvement was not overwhelming, leaving the latest Windows iteration outshined by its predecessor.

Vista, both with and without SP1, performed notably slower than XP with SP3 in the test, taking over 80 seconds to complete the test, compared to the beta SP3-enhanced XP's 35 seconds.

Vista's performance with the service pack increased less than 2 percent compared to performance without SP1--much lower than XP's SP3 improvement of 10 percent. The tests, run on a Dell XPS M1710 test bed with a 2GHz Core 2 Duo CPU and 1GB of RAM, put Microsoft Office 2007 through a set of productivity tasks, including creating a compound document and supporting workbooks and presentation materials.

In response to the test, a Microsoft spokesperson said in a statement that although the company understood the interest in the service packs, they are "still in development" and will continue to evolve before their release. "It has always been our goal to deliver service packs that meet the full spectrum of customer needs," the spokesperson said.

If SP1 does not evolve sufficiently, it could be another setback for Vista, with many businesses waiting to adopt the operating system until the service pack is released.

A year after its launch, only 13 percent of businesses have adopted Vista, according to a survey of IT professionals.

Microsoft admits that the launch has not gone as well as the company would have liked. "Frankly, the world wasn't 100 percent ready for Windows Vista," corporate vice president Mike Sievert said in a recent interview at Microsoft's partner conference in Denver.

Microsoft has not done enough to make users aware of the benefits of Vista, NPD analyst Chris Swenson said at the conference. "The problem is that there are a lot of complex new features in Vista, and you need to educate consumers about them...much like Apple educating the masses about the possibilities of the iPhone or focusing on a single feature or benefit of the Mac OS in the Mac-versus-PC commercials. Microsoft should be educating the masses about the various new features in a heavy rotation of Vista in TV, radio, and print ads. But the volume of ads (for Vista) has paled in comparison to the ads run for XP."

XP has proved to be more popular than its younger sibling, with the first six months of U.S. retail sales of box copies of Vista 59.7 percent below those of XP's in the equivalent period after its release.

Microsoft has had to allow PC manufacturers to continue to sell XP on new PCs, setting a deadline for the last sale at January 31. However, the pressure from manufacturers and consumers has been so great that Microsoft has been forced to extend the deadline another five months, until June.

According to Microsoft, sales of Vista have been picking up, with the software giant reporting 88 million units sold.

Suzanne Tindal of ZDNet Australia reported from Sydney. CNET News.com's Ina Fried contributed to this article.

©2007 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. CNET , CNET.com , and the CNET logo are registered trademarks of CNET Networks, Inc. Used by permission.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 181 Talkback(s)
VISTA v XP ???
Newer, bigger,
is that better?

Why all these "new" bloated applications???
================
I like new ideas,
but,
Do we need to spend the wasted time re-learning new ways t... (Read the rest)
Posted by: info@... Posted on: 01/20/08 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
XP outshines Vista...what a surprise... jgt10@...   | 11/27/07
look at OS X frgough   | 11/27/07
Sure it is voska   | 11/27/07
Apples to Apples middle of nowhere   | 11/27/07
Those are essentially Service Packs tikigawd   | 11/28/07
Not so my friend.... Laff   | 11/28/07
Yo no se notsofast   | 11/30/07
major vs minor kernel changes nix_hed   | 11/29/07
Hardware Compatability with OS mc_rog46_sd1@...   | 12/30/07
Well.....competition tends to make others better. Laff   | 11/28/07
OS Performance chromeronin   | 11/28/07
A single benchmark against a single .... ShadeTree   | 11/27/07
What's it matter, the results are expected voska   | 11/27/07
Not true! ShadeTree   | 11/27/07
More relevant studies shoktai@...   | 11/27/07
That's not how I remember it. SpikeyMike   | 11/27/07
Good points voska   | 11/27/07
I disagree big time voska   | 11/27/07
That's the way I remember it, too TranMan   | 11/29/07
Disagree itpro_z   | 11/27/07
pardon... ivanotter   | 11/28/07
Just out of curiosity... itpro_z   | 11/28/07
yes i have ivanotter   | 11/30/07
Dude you're wrong... pgm554   | 11/28/07
Did we read the same article? itpro_z   | 11/28/07
XP does NOT outperform W2k! bjbrock   | 11/27/07
Ya Right mark.chaffee@...   | 11/28/07
Nope ,W2K is faster pgm554   | 11/28/07
Bloated Software coachgeorge   | 11/28/07
Well... pgm554   | 11/28/07
ShadeTree, your comment would be credible if... Michael Of Atlanta   | 11/27/07
On comparable equipment... itpro_z   | 11/27/07
can't say merc2dogs`   | 11/28/07
thats odd... ivanotter   | 11/28/07
Read this and be amazed! pgm554   | 11/28/07
I read the article... itpro_z   | 11/28/07
Same here,but pgm554   | 11/29/07
Your missing the point pherioux@...   | 11/29/07
Am I? itpro_z   | 11/29/07
Your comment would be credible .... ShadeTree   | 11/27/07
Give it up Chad_z   | 11/27/07
High end itpro_z   | 11/27/07
Wow, what a surprise you spoke out against this study Aragorn_z   | 11/28/07
Have a better idea. ivanotter   | 11/28/07
RE: Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test MadBastard   | 11/27/07
Poor hardware choice leads to biased result... Mike Cox   | 11/27/07
Heh GrubLord   | 11/27/07
Is it the OS or the computer Michael Kelly   | 11/27/07
Shock and Awe... SpikeyMike   | 11/27/07
Lets get Mike Cox on Jon Stewart dfolk   | 11/27/07
I love it DarthRidiculous   | 11/27/07
Hardware fix for bad software. martin_haring@...   | 11/27/07
4.0 at best Shelendrea   | 11/27/07
8.5 "....more intuitive Printer Wizard.." WiredGuy   | 11/27/07
Mike Cox gets another slam dunk! Aragorn_z   | 11/28/07
The joke is... John L. Ries   | 11/28/07
Come ON!!!!!! Give Me A Break coachgeorge   | 11/28/07
Hook... thx-1138_@...   | 11/28/07
For more rapid results stevey_d   | 11/29/07
ggrrrrrrr.... thx-1138_@...   | 11/29/07
RE: Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test jpachner   | 11/27/07
That's fine... SpikeyMike   | 11/27/07
Linux is faster than both Linux Geek   | 11/27/07
This isn't about Linux, its about Windows GeiselS@...   | 11/27/07
I'd say it's about performance voska   | 11/27/07
In an article about varying OSes Boot_Agnostic   | 11/28/07
Topic was performance... SpikeyMike   | 11/27/07
Now all we need is for it to do something. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/27/07
There is tons of software choices voska   | 11/27/07
Not really No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/27/07
Message has been deleted. jasonp@...   | 11/27/07
Message has been deleted. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/27/07
I find the opposite voska   | 11/28/07
Message has been deleted. ego.sum.stig@...   | 11/27/07
Try Linux App Finder chessmen   | 11/28/07
Software Choice chromeronin   | 11/28/07
Ummm, sorry but no. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/27/07
YAWN stephen@...   | 11/28/07
steven@ mac0252   | 11/29/07
here we go again . . . pete_w_flynn@...   | 11/29/07
Hmmm, I knew it Krazyken39   | 11/27/07
Getting to the login screen... SpikeyMike   | 11/27/07
Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test.... mrOSX   | 11/27/07
The problem is... JohnMcGrew@...   | 11/27/07
Disagree itpro_z   | 11/27/07
My question is... JohnMcGrew@...   | 11/27/07
Huh... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/27/07
Wow Sabz5150   | 11/27/07
See. The WOW does start now! (nt) pmcgrath@...   | 11/27/07
Windows Explorer is certainly better Michael Kelly   | 11/27/07
Isn't benchmarking forbidden by the SP betas' EULA PB_z   | 11/27/07
The Microsoft EULA Ole Man   | 11/27/07
sadomachistic mikeysoft amj2006   | 11/27/07
Benchmarks are NOT needed to see what is happening. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/27/07
Isn't this the same thing Shelendrea   | 11/27/07
this news is pure FUD ! qmlscycrajg   | 11/27/07
The World is not 100% ready? kd5auq   | 11/27/07
RE: The World is not 100% ready? duane.wills@...   | 11/28/07
What do you expect from the MPAA/RIAA infested vista? kraterz   | 11/27/07
At least Vista has one thing going for it Ole Man   | 11/27/07
Faint praise for XP Ole Man   | 11/27/07
High-end equipment davids@...   | 11/28/07
RE: Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test prbarry   | 11/28/07
32 GB ram and so on erik.t   | 11/28/07
Test system itpro_z   | 11/28/07
You can't have it both ways Ole Man   | 11/28/07
Read again itpro_z   | 11/28/07
don't you understand, old man mac0252   | 11/29/07
The case for new hardware me@...   | 11/28/07
key is merc2dogs`   | 11/28/07
grrr... ivanotter   | 11/28/07
Looks like it is.......... Ole Man   | 11/28/07
wow... ivanotter   | 11/28/07
There is also more "yous" in "you-all" than yourself Ole Man   | 11/28/07
just tired of idiots... ivanotter   | 11/29/07
oh and BTW ivanotter   | 11/29/07
You must be talking to your mirror Ole Man   | 12/07/07
The value of what is being said depends Ole Man   | 12/07/07
RE: Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test rossboone@...   | 11/28/07
Sheeple Original_Nocturnal   | 11/28/07
64-bit Original_Nocturnal   | 11/28/07
Wrong? croberts   | 11/28/07
Close... shardeth   | 11/28/07
Thanks for the clarification croberts   | 11/28/07
On the limits me@...   | 11/29/07
wrong Original_Nocturnal   | 11/28/07
Nope Original_Nocturnal   | 11/28/07
It's starting to happen me@...   | 11/29/07
Problem for MS - no direction croberts   | 11/28/07
Author MISINFORMED... mindwarp311   | 11/28/07
Was that a Microsoft funded test? Ole Man   | 11/28/07
Never mind any of that... try... Debian,Ubuntu, Etc hugh@...   | 11/28/07
Linux Suxs Herc@...   | 11/28/07
He forgot to tell you Ole Man   | 11/28/07
wait a minute, I reconise you!!!!!!!!!! mac0252   | 11/29/07
Thank GOD for Linux!!! AAWW   | 11/28/07
Vista sales increasing? - by choice? hitechroadrunner   | 11/28/07
A moment of silence, please, for OS/2 Warp+ johannk   | 11/28/07
Seconded John L. Ries   | 11/28/07
It wasn't neglect, it was enemy action critic-at-arms   | 11/28/07
A perfect example Ole Man   | 11/28/07
I was, I do and if there were the apps I need . . . critic-at-arms   | 11/28/07
RE: Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test teresa.levy@...   | 11/28/07
That is good news to know Ole Man   | 11/28/07
Windows 95 outshines XP and Vista in benchmarking tests lijujg@...   | 11/28/07
Maybe it is... croberts   | 11/28/07
Bigger is Not Better, but change is possible. tomam   | 11/28/07
RE: Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test zarchasmpgmr   | 11/28/07
RE: Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test kheeth@...   | 11/28/07
RE: Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test erniem1970@...   | 11/28/07
sorry dude mac0252   | 11/29/07
RE: The Article does not seem fair/just. rfgd@...   | 11/28/07
I assume you meant... ivanotter   | 11/30/07
RE: Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test KrazyGuy   | 11/28/07
Vista-a major step backward becomann   | 11/28/07
Comparison chromeronin   | 11/28/07
Why Vista? cbrackin99   | 11/28/07
RE: Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test eddia63@...   | 11/29/07
"Frankly, the world wasn't 100 percent ready for Windows Vista," tigerpaw   | 11/29/07
Windoze 98? lauren.glenn@...   | 11/29/07
Assuming you could find drivers. itpro_z   | 11/29/07
Maybe if they were original... John Musbach   | 11/29/07
How did the test, where is the full disclosure on methodology georgeou   | 11/29/07
Typo correction, who did the test georgeou   | 11/29/07
The world not ready for Vista? cdiazh   | 11/29/07
RE: Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test anisahsmith@...   | 11/29/07
MS DOS 5.0 Outshines Vista dsx1962@...   | 11/29/07
Mental Midget Herc@...   | 11/30/07
486 is the champion of all !!! SEM999   | 11/30/07
RE: Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test cynthia_sparks2002@...   | 11/30/07
RE: Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test masterxtds   | 11/30/07
Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test pawelred@...   | 12/06/07
Hardware + Software = Profit albanusalain@...   | 12/06/07
Yes Sir bcroner   | 12/10/07
RE: Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test spirobulldog2004@...   | 01/09/08
You are completely wrong!! (ignore my above comment) spirobulldog2004@...   | 01/09/08
Try selling one version of the desktop OS instead of two mhector@...   | 01/17/08
Modern PC paul.byford   | 01/17/08
ROTFLMAO................... mrdood_99205@...   | 01/17/08
more like vista wasn't ready for the world mister vice pres. Mike Sievert! wessonjoe   | 01/17/08
VISTA v XP ??? info@...   | 01/20/08

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement