On TV.com: MEL GIBSON Calls TV Reporter a Bad Word
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Charles Cooper
Posted on ZDNet News: Jan 14, 2005 7:31:00 PM

Commentary--Five years ago this week, Bill Gates passed the CEO baton to Steve Ballmer.

Microsoft's co-founder left the job he had held since 1975 to take on a new role as chief software architect. The idea was to free him up to concentrate full-time on new technology. The business was changing, and Microsoft, no longer a scrappy start-up, needed to chart new directions in the face of nascent challenges in the post-dot-com era.

It was a move that also offered Gates a golden opportunity to prove his critics wrong and show that he was every bit the technologist his resume claimed he was. To be sure, Microsoft has always been touchy about suggestions that it is less of a technology innovator than a technology follower.

Microsoft has always been touchy about suggestions that it is less of a technology innovator than a technology follower.

Few sane people would dispute the contention that Gates is the most successful business mogul of the last 50 years. But when it comes to rating his talent as a code jockey, will history render a similar judgment? Any time the subject is Gates, the debate is bound to turn radioactive. But passions aside, there's now enough evidence with which to reach an interim opinion. Let's consider the highlights.

Internet Explorer
After Microsoft bested Netscape during the Internet browser wars of the late 1990s, IE ruled the roost. With the game over, Microsoft also lost any incentive to make the product substantively better. And after the U.S. Department of Justice failed in its bid to break IE off of Windows, Microsoft had even less motivation to get cracking. But the technology business doesn't stand still for long.

If Microsoft needed a wake-up call, the rapid emergence of Mozilla's Firefox browser in 2004 was it. If Microsoft dawdles much longer, the number of users downloading IE alternatives in 2005 will turn into a stampede.

.Net My Services
I'll bet a week's wages that most folks have no idea what .Net My Services was supposed to be. Don't feel too bad--neither did Microsoft. Originally code-named HailStorm, this was a grab bag of cool-sounding Internet-based services that Microsoft likened to a digital safe-deposit box to host personal information.

This was a complicated idea that was surrounded by confusion right from the get-go. Just as bad, Microsoft couldn't figure out how to make it pay for itself. The project, slated to debut in 2002, has since been shelved.

When the historians take his measure, Gates may ultimately be remembered most for the impact of his philanthropy.

Longhorn
Microsoft originally planned to ship this next major version of Windows by 2004. Now the company says it will ship Longhorn sometime late in 2006. Even more embarrassing, Microsoft won't be able to implement its highly touted WinFS file system with the release of the operating system.

The excuse being offered is that, well, Longhorn is complicated. Besides, Microsoft poured an enormous amount of resources into shipping its SP2 security patch. All that may be true, but it doesn't change that fact that Microsoft let this project sprawl out of control. Meanwhile, the Macintosh operating system and Linux continue to advance apace.

Security
Talk about a self-inflicted black eye. Microsoft took an eternity to figure out how to respond to the vulnerabilities in its software. But even after the release of SP2, problems continue to surface. All this raises inevitable questions about process and oversight. How can a company look a customer in the eye if it can't vouch for the security of its products? Microsoft's glass half-full argument that things are far better still doesn't cut it.

Search
Years after Google soared to supremacy, Microsoft now has a beta version of the Web search technology it will ultimately offer--sometime. Gates promised that Microsoft would have something ready by the end of 2004, but the world is still waiting to see the beef. Even when it comes to desktop search, terrain where Microsoft should dominate, Google's out ahead.

When the historians take his measure, Gates may ultimately be remembered most for the importance of his philanthropy. Considering the impact of what he's doing in the sphere of disease prevention through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, there's clearly a case to be made.

But when it comes to his talent as a technologist, the track record tells a different story. It is beyond contestation that a lesser mortal would have been sent packing long ago.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 100 Talkback(s)
Gates and timing
Well of course you did not expect Bill Gates to be able to repeat his coup called Windows. You have to remember that Gates is first and foremost a marketer and a very good one). But timing is everythi... (Read the rest)
Posted by: don.chambers@... Posted on: 01/19/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Microsoft OS advancement  geobrown | 01/14/05
Comment on the Mac vs PC  Oscar_Goldman | 01/14/05
FreeBSD  Linux User 147560 | 01/14/05
Use Opensource MS, like your free developer Apple  matson_z | 01/15/05
Apple no, Mac OS maybe  drichards1953 | 01/18/05
Another waste of time  davidmthompson@... | 01/14/05
So what?  TWRX | 01/14/05
If only..  d_jedi | 01/17/05
Worked great for BeOS, didn't it?  tic swayback | 01/17/05
Many care longhorn is late  Arrg | 01/14/05
What about Yukon?  nucrash | 01/14/05
Agreed  IT Scion | 01/14/05
Agreed in a few points  Anti_Zealot | 01/14/05
We agree and yes  IT Scion | 01/14/05
You dismiss some important points  voska | 01/14/05
Pocket PC a major success?  Sunny Jalolly | 01/14/05
pocketpc still losing money, and pda market shrinking  hipparchus2000 | 01/16/05
It's about time ...  dave95 | 01/14/05
No  Jeff Spicoli | 01/14/05
criminal?  jcvortex | 01/14/05
typo  jcvortex | 01/14/05
Message has been deleted.  Jeff Spicoli | 01/14/05
jeff...  jcvortex | 01/14/05
Re: jeff...  Anti_Zealot | 01/14/05
Thanks Anti_zealot!  Jeff Spicoli | 01/14/05
For the sake of historical accuracy  Len Rooney | 01/14/05
I was about to tell the same story  denisrs | 01/17/05
Correction  edy_z | 01/18/05
Yes  dave95 | 01/14/05
Separating the two  rapson | 01/14/05
No you don't  voska | 01/14/05
Oh yeah, I did call BS on this guy  voska | 01/14/05
However  johnnyu | 01/16/05
Indeed...  Anti_Zealot | 01/16/05
People still think subpar products actually matter?  bfsunny | 01/14/05
So MS is the Walmart of the computer industry!  dave95 | 01/14/05
Yes and yes  voska | 01/14/05
Only $200?  Anti_Zealot | 01/14/05
That's par the course  seosamh_z | 01/15/05
Camparison shopping  seosamh_z | 01/15/05
RE: Camparison shopping  richdave | 01/15/05
Evaluating Bill Gates or MS?  jcvortex | 01/14/05
Which is still a blunder in my book.  nucrash | 01/14/05
It's the $$$$  voska | 01/14/05
Gates needs to get marketing tips from Jobs  dave95 | 01/14/05
The last line said it all!  Jeff Spicoli | 01/14/05
Gates is not bright technically  Guy Fawkes | 01/14/05
I Agree With You  mobileomega | 01/15/05
Don't Agree  Rodney Davis | 01/15/05
not a good example  Nullifidian | 01/17/05
Not required  rapson | 01/17/05
but it sure helps!  Nullifidian | 01/17/05
Gates is smooth criminal  denisrs | 01/17/05
Yes, a good example.  Rodney Davis | 01/18/05
Bright Vs right  seosamh_z | 01/17/05
Gates is extremely bright  DonPMitchell@... | 01/19/05
Good enough  alterego_z | 01/14/05
Well..  Jeff Spicoli | 01/14/05
They need to get rid of both Gates and Balmer.  DonnieBoy | 01/14/05
After Gates and Balmer  DarkFate | 01/14/05
Well the company was built on Luck  voska | 01/14/05
Having met Mr. Gates...  gfeier | 01/14/05
I don't think any argues that he's an idiot  voska | 01/14/05
Maybe they won't because...  Anti_Zealot | 01/14/05
Proof people buy whatever crap they're marketed  NotMSUser | 01/14/05
yea I know  jcvortex | 01/14/05
you're right  Anti_Zealot | 01/14/05
Bottom Line  hipparchus2000 | 01/14/05
Oh the disgruntled legacy folks.  jimk_z | 01/14/05
not that tired old nonsense again  hipparchus2000 | 01/15/05
But not before...  Rodney Davis | 01/15/05
Microsoft Before what?  Anti_Zealot | 01/15/05
Facts  Flying4Fun | 01/17/05
More facts  Anti_Zealot | 01/17/05
Gates is Smooth Criminal indeed  denisrs | 01/17/05
If windows had not held us back for 10 years  jjon2121 | 01/17/05
i could careless about longhorn  M_c | 01/14/05
Gates track record Appalling.  Computergeek_z | 01/15/05
Remember what used to be said about IBM?  jdtiede@... | 01/15/05
Part of what ailed IBM for a long time...  jeffdickey | 01/15/05
Gates is not stupid....  deeby | 01/15/05
I might add that...  deeby | 01/15/05
As I remember...  Mark Miller | 01/15/05
"microsoft basic on every computer sold" - list them then  hipparchus2000 | 01/16/05
browser obsolete?  theo_durcan | 01/17/05
Things every developer should remember  Anti_Zealot | 01/17/05
I think Bill Gates has been successful in spite of himself  mlindl | 01/16/05
Maybe, maybe not  rapson | 01/17/05
Yes and No....Most people when they try to figure out  Laff | 01/17/05
Got Root?  Nullifidian | 01/17/05
Let's Give Gates A Grade On His Performance  itanalyst | 01/17/05
Buy from Steve or Linus  FilledOut | 01/17/05
His company codes, he contributes very little code.  CobraA1 | 01/17/05
Oh please  rbethell | 01/18/05
Maybe, but...  rapson | 01/18/05
Altair...heh heh heh...snicker..:)  Laff | 01/18/05
Let's not be ridiculous  joshdcohen@... | 01/18/05
A note on tablets  CobraA1 | 01/18/05
Looking for an a$$ to ki$$s  oo7curtis | 01/18/05
Gates and timing  don.chambers@... | 01/19/05

What do you think?

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here