On mySimon: Ugg Woments Cargo Iii
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Martin LaMonica
Posted on ZDNet News: Dec 21, 2005 8:01:00 AM

IBM does not intend to participate in an Ecma International standards committee that is standardizing Microsoft Office document formats, an IBM company executive said on Tuesday.

As a member of the Geneva, Switzerland-based Ecma organization, IBM can participate in the committee, called Ecma 45, which is creating an internationally recognized standard from the XML-based document formats used in the forthcoming Microsoft Office 12 product. Microsoft submitted the 1,900-page Office Open XML specification to Ecma last week.

Listen up

Bob Sutor, IBM's vice president of standards and open source, speaks with CNET News.com reporter Martin LaMonica about the importance of the emerging OpenDocument format, and what's happening with ODF in Massachusetts.
Listen now... (853KB mp3)

But IBM has decided sit on the sidelines, at least for now, according to Bob Sutor, IBM's vice president of standards and open source.

"We think there are just too many open switches on this right now for us to go in and do something there. Given the charter, it's not clear what anyone other than Microsoft is going to be doing on this committee," Sutor said on Tuesday.

IBM is a big supporter of OpenDocument and intends to have that document format as the default in its forthcoming Workplace products.

Bob Sutor
Bob Sutor
IBM VP of Standards

Sutor said Microsoft was trying to have its document formats "rubber-stamped" as standards by Ecma. He said it doesn't appear that the committee, which has Microsoft representatives as co-chairs, can be influenced by companies other than Microsoft.

A Microsoft representative was not available for comment Tuesday. The company posted an FAQ about Ecma and the standardization process last week.

Sutor said that within the next year or two the committee should consider a "convergence path" between the Office Open XML document formats and OpenDocument, another set of standards for creating and storing documents.

"We want to see flexibility. We'd like to see some convergence path. Fundamentally, it has to be community-driven thing and we don't see that now," he said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 48 Talkback(s)
Well...
That all sounds so spiffy.

So, your experience was that the process took years. So, with that in mind, why should IBM leap in now when they don't really need to, if it is going to take years. <... (Read the rest)
Posted by: zkiwi Posted on: 12/26/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Do they have their people working everywhere??  Turazoor | 12/21/05
Why partake in an obvious biased committee? (NT)  ju1ce | 12/21/05
How do you know its biased  Michael Kelly | 12/21/05
To answer your question  Yagotta B. Kidding | 12/21/05
I'm not saying I don't agree  Michael Kelly | 12/21/05
Not nearly as many places as does IBM.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/21/05
I support IBM  nucrash | 12/21/05
That may be so  Michael Kelly | 12/21/05
Exactly  zztong | 12/21/05
Well said  rapson | 12/21/05
Key difference  Yagotta B. Kidding | 12/21/05
Hope Sutor doesn't get overridden  mvaar | 12/21/05
Comeon IBM. Just put some gravy on the dogfood.  osreinstall | 12/21/05
IBM are talking RUBBISH  Roger Huffadine | 12/21/05
Thank you for an excellent post Roger!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/21/05
Agree.  zztong | 12/21/05
Good post Roger, but....  WiredGuy | 12/21/05
If only it worked like that  Roger Huffadine | 12/22/05
Well...  zkiwi | 12/26/05
More agreement  georgep_z | 12/21/05
Have you read the charter?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 12/21/05
IBM appologist?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/21/05
Is this the same IBM that had the NetSphere "standards" rubber stamped?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/21/05
Interesting assumption  Yagotta B. Kidding | 12/21/05
Same as you do when I point out facts about MS.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/21/05
Projecting again, Don  Yagotta B. Kidding | 12/21/05
It only means that IBM does NOT care about MS's "open" standard.  michael_t | 12/21/05
What are you complaining about?  balsover | 12/21/05
And that's the key  rapson | 12/22/05
You got that right.  osreinstall | 12/22/05
IBM sits out Office document standards effort  rchardon@... | 12/21/05
Dude, it is IBM that has been whinining about Java...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/21/05
Dude, I think he means...  The King's Servant | 12/21/05
Standards are WORTHLESS unless if they are royalty free OPEN specifications  xunil skcor | 12/21/05
Remove cluelessness, read the license. It is royalty free.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/21/05
100% agreement  dzash2000 | 12/21/05
Why swim with the shark?  Jick | 12/21/05
If you can't swim with the big boys, go home.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/21/05
I also agree...  Cayble | 12/21/05
IBM's good choice  PhilippeV | 12/21/05
Open Schmopen, someone owns the license.  osreinstall | 12/21/05
At least I am convinced thath MS is adopting the open  michael_t | 12/21/05
MS will create collaborative lock-in via database engine +  interoperate | 12/21/05
You mean like Oracle, SyBase, DB2???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/21/05
You missed the point  interoperate | 12/22/05
IBM waiting to show it's patent on something else  Boot_Agnostic | 12/22/05
IBM sits out office standard.  elements | 12/24/05
MS Office XML is rubbish, so why invest effort  hipparchus2001 | 12/24/05

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here