On CBS.com: Exclusive video from GHOST WHISPERER
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Greg Sandoval
Posted on ZDNet News: Oct 21, 2006 1:00:00 PM

People posting copyright material on YouTube shouldn't be surprised if the company makes no effort to protect them in a copyright battle.

The video-sharing site may hand over information on those who post video clips of movies and TV shows if they're accused of copyright infringement, something perhaps not well known by those who do so.

Robert Tur, a Los Angeles-based journalist who recorded scenes of the 1992 Los Angeles riots, filed suit against YouTube in July after seeing numerous clips of his video on the site. In a letter to Tur, YouTube attorneys said he should instead go after the person who posted the video, according to Tur's attorney, Francis Pizzulli.

"Mr. Tur was advised that...he could file a lawsuit against the YouTube user," Pizzulli said. "Mr. Tur was informed that it was YouTube policy to provide copyright owners with user identification information (after receiving a valid subpoena)."

After receiving such a subpoena in another case last summer, YouTube turned over information belonging to Chris Moukarbel, who was being sued by Paramount Pictures for making a movie based on a script owned by the studio, according to a Friday story in MarketWatch.

A YouTube representative did not respond to an interview request from CNET News.com.

That YouTube will not cover up for accused lawbreakers shouldn't come as a surprise. The company has consistently said that it will obey the law and that it doesn't want copyright material on its site. That message is spelled out in YouTube's user agreement, as well as in a computer prompt that appears before a person uploads a clip.

The company also says it removes clips once notified of a copyright violation.

But YouTube owes much of its early fame to the unauthorized posting of movie and TV show clips.

YouTube first began attracting attention after clips from NBC TV's "Saturday Night Live," showed up on its site. Much was written about the show's appearance on YouTube and the subsequent demand by NBC that the clips be removed. Since then, slices of sporting events, news shows, feature films, soap operas and music videos have appeared on YouTube.

And the payoff came earlier this month. It was YouTube's 16 million monthly visitors that helped convince Google to pay $1.65 billion for the video-sharing site.

Since the sale, entertainment companies have begun making noise about their unwillingness to stand still while YouTube and others attract crowds with their properties. A group of Japanese media companies demanded Friday that YouTube remove more than 29,000 videos, and the company complied.

Universal Music Group said on Tuesday that it had filed lawsuits against video-sharing sites Grouper and Bolt.com for the alleged copyright violations on their sites. It remains unclear why Universal did not name YouTube in its suit.

YouTube has said it is working on new methods to help thwart copyright violations. The company has also said that it is not responsible for copyright violations; the users are.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 63 Talkback(s)
Registering
Registering puts the copyright on public record. Posting something where others can see it is the public domain the way I read it.

This is from www.copyright.gov.
"Why should I register m... (Read the rest)
Posted by: WhiteKnight77 Posted on: 10/24/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Sheesh...  John Le'Brecage | 10/21/06
News is not copyrighted.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/23/06
You're right  Shelendrea | 10/23/06
No gray at all.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/23/06
Yes but  Shelendrea | 10/23/06
What about fair use?  tic swayback | 10/23/06
Fair use  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/23/06
So is copyrights  voska | 10/23/06
Wow. Just wow.  tic swayback | 10/23/06
Gotta totally disagree with that one, No Ax...  Allstar_z | 10/23/06
Fair use has NOTHING to do  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/23/06
So what if they are  voska | 10/23/06
Making money is irrelevant  tic swayback | 10/23/06
YouTube is not fair use.  osreinstall | 10/23/06
It certainly can be  tic swayback | 10/23/06
Maybe, but is it worth it.  osreinstall | 10/23/06
But YouTube has safe harbor  tic swayback | 10/24/06
Appearing to do something goes a long way.  osreinstall | 10/24/06
Fair use, what fair use?  jdubow@... | 10/23/06
Copyright  WhiteKnight77 | 10/24/06
copyright  fionncreagh@... | 10/23/06
correct.  nhac | 10/23/06
You also rely on copyright...  A.Sinic | 10/24/06
Registering  WhiteKnight77 | 10/24/06
Sorry, you're wrong  orangemike | 10/23/06
FOX & The Simpsons  majoritywhip | 10/21/06
Simpsons ratings went down because  fasteight | 10/21/06
I'm Talking About Back In The Day  majoritywhip | 10/21/06
In the early 90s  voska | 10/23/06
Sued into oblivion  sigmaman1 | 10/21/06
What are you folks smoking?  BeGoneFool | 10/21/06
I can feel your anger  majoritywhip | 10/21/06
There Loss not mine  chrisjenx2001 | 10/23/06
They have legit fears  voska | 10/23/06
well this will not change a thing  Quebec-french | 10/23/06
So you're cheering for the scum...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/23/06
well if you see it that way  Quebec-french | 10/23/06
Of course it can...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/23/06
Still wouldn't stop  voska | 10/23/06
Not necessarily cheering...  tic swayback | 10/23/06
Hogwash...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/23/06
So you agree with the original poster?  tic swayback | 10/23/06
No, what is needed is MUCH  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/23/06
But that's not working  tic swayback | 10/23/06
5 years first offense 10 for subsequent  Edward Meyers | 10/24/06
Anyone else think Youtube has met it's match in the almighty dollar?  BitTwiddler | 10/23/06
It was only a matter of time  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/23/06
well this time  Quebec-french | 10/23/06
What pact?  voska | 10/23/06
voska sorry for the english  Quebec-french | 10/23/06
I see  voska | 10/23/06
True enough...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/23/06
YouTube has always been law-abiding  tic swayback | 10/23/06
A matter of education  filipiak | 10/23/06
Schools and universities are notorious violators  orangemike | 10/23/06
I could be mistaken but...  glocks out | 10/23/06
You are in fact completely mistaken  orangemike | 10/23/06
Correct  tic swayback | 10/23/06
"Fair Use" not crystal  D-cat | 10/24/06
Out of control...  chas_2 | 10/23/06
sucks  nhac | 10/23/06
It's destroying our culture (n/t)  Henrick Ericcson | 10/24/06
So does YouTube not even notice  laurasauvary@... | 10/24/06

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More