On BNET: 6 cool reasons to search with bing
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

Posted on ZDNet News: Jan 18, 2006 12:41:00 PM

Reuters Logo NTP, the U.S. patent-holding company seeking a shutdown of most U.S. BlackBerry sales and service, proposed on Tuesday that customers of the portable e-mail device get a 30-day "grace period" before any cutoff.

Lawyers for NTP, which is suing BlackBerry maker Research In Motion on charges of patent infringement, reiterated their request that the judge impose an injunction unless the two sides reach a settlement.

"NTP's proposed form of injunction provides a reasonable (30-day) grace period for RIM's customers and partners to switch to alternative products before the injunction affects them," NTP said in its court brief.

The injunction proposed by NTP would also exempt federal, state and local government users of the BlackBerry, as well as emergency first-responders from any service cutoff.

RIM said in its filing that it would be "difficult, if not impossible" to cut off service to some users while maintaining it for the government.

Citing the "exceptional public interest" in maintaining uninterrupted BlackBerry service, especially to workers in national security and health and safety, RIM called on U.S. District Judge James Spencer to back away from issuing any injunction and to convene a new trial.

"The public interest here far outweighs NTP's economic interests, which are fully compensable through damages," RIM said in its brief.

RIM also said the software "workaround" it had devised to avoid infringing NTP's patents would cause "concern" among users and service providers because it would require reloading software on servers and the handheld devices.

But NTP downplayed the hardship that RIM's commercial customers would suffer from a shutdown, saying "there are "a number of licensed alternatives which can fully meet their requirements."

Among the alternatives to the BlackBerry is the Treo 650 smart phone made by computer and smartphone maker. Both devices offer phone and e-mail service, access to personal calendars and the Internet.

Spencer has ordered both sides to file response briefs on Feb. 1, and the judge is expected to schedule a date soon for a hearing on the arguments.

NTP filed a patent infringement lawsuit against RIM in 2001, and a jury in Richmond, Va., found in NTP's favor in 2002. In 2003, Spencer granted an injunction that would have halted U.S. sales of the BlackBerry and shut down its service, but stayed the injunction pending appeal.

An appeals court in August scaled back the ruling against RIM, but upheld some patent infringement claims.

Requests by RIM to get the courts to stay the case, including a recent request to U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts, have failed.

On Nov. 30, Spencer rejected RIM's request to delay the case and refused to force NTP to accept $450 million from RIM as a settlement.

Still before Spencer is the question of what effect, if any, the appeals court ruling should have on the injunction and damages being sought by NTP.

In a separate proceeding, RIM is challenging the validity of the NTP patents before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

The two sides have held talks to settle the court case in recent months. In the brief filed on Tuesday, NTP argued that it had made a reasonable offer to settle the case, but had been rejected by RIM.

Story Copyright © 2006 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved.

Story Copyright © 2006 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 19 Talkback(s)
only problem
The only problem with your logic.

If they could not sell it for $50 during the initial sales period they would never make it. There would be no DVD's, no PC's, no HDTV, No home networks.. et... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Techanalyst Posted on: 01/24/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
The whole patent system is messed up.  kraterz | 01/18/06
The problem can be summed up easily  John E Wahd | 01/19/06
Qualcomm,  petteyg359 | 01/23/06
Don't have any original thoughts, Kraterz!  zappattazz@... | 01/24/06
One rule for who?  Graham H | 01/19/06
well put  RogerMcCook | 01/23/06
One rule for who (complete)  Graham H | 01/19/06
They should reach a settlement  Leria | 01/23/06
Patent Office  sorns | 01/23/06
Most things in the US are overpriced  Leria | 01/23/06
Blame it on the Stock Market  Narg | 01/23/06
only problem  Techanalyst | 01/24/06
So Keep your Patents  capship | 01/23/06
Watch out for the drone  RogerMcCook | 01/23/06
Blackberry cut-off.....  davidlewis7 | 01/23/06
You hit the nail on the head  Leria | 01/23/06
They don't want to own it.  ajmeyercan | 01/23/06
extortion by tort  jeasterl | 01/23/06
NTP and Balckberry  ben.meltzer | 01/23/06

What do you think?

Product Spotlight

advertisement
Click Here