On The Insider: Sexy Aussie Babes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Stephen Shankland, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Mar 29, 2006 8:44:00 PM

Advanced Micro Devices has hired Samuel Naffziger, a high-ranking designer of Intel's Itanium processors, and eight of his Fort Collins, Colo.-based colleagues working on the high-end processor.

Naffziger, one of about 50 at Intel who held the rank of fellow, was director of Itanium circuits and technology. He joined the chipmaker in 2005 when Intel hired Itanium designers from Hewlett-Packard, where Naffziger led the Itanium design team for eight years.

Sam Naffziger Sam Naffziger

At AMD, he is a senior fellow and will work on design development, spokesman Phil Hughes said, declining to share further details about what he or the eight other Itanium engineers will do. Because of a 2003 acquisition, AMD has a design center in Longmont, Colo., not far from Fort Collins.

While not the only high-ranking designer behind the Itanium line--Intel argues it still has a deep bench--Naffziger played a leading role. He introduced two major Itanium models to the world at the International Solid State Circuits Conference, the "McKinley" version in 2002 and "Montecito" in 2005.

Naffziger's departure was reported by Real World Technologies.

Intel has had troubles with Itanium--most recently a delay pushing Montecito from 2005 to the second quarter of 2006, which Pat Gelsinger, Intel's top server executive, acknowledged this month was an "embarrassment." But Intel, HP and other Itanium allies still envision a bright future and are spending billions of dollars to restore Itanium's fortunes. Some of that funding is going to an expansion of Itanium engineering staff, Gelsinger said.

AMD took a different approach. Instead of creating a new, incompatible processor family, it beefed up its existing x86 processor line with features such as 64-bit memory addressing. Intel had for a time reserved that only for Itanium, but eventually added those features to its successful Xeon x86 server chip family.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 16 Talkback(s)
ISA becoming irrelevant
the encoding of an instruction set is really not all that interesting. yes, the RISC dogma of fixed-sized 32b instructions is very tidy, but it's certainly not optimal in the sense of maximizing code... (Read the rest)
Posted by: markhahn Posted on: 03/31/06 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
AMD now has top architects from all server camps sharikou   | 03/29/06
Send them back! GoPower   | 03/29/06
RE: Send them back! ajapierce   | 03/29/06
What is a "fellow?" mobrien_12@...   | 03/29/06
That is corporate speak Roger Ramjet   | 03/30/06
This is really strange, especially after Intel AT LAST michael_t   | 03/29/06
*yawn* mockylock   | 03/29/06
Over-under... bidemytime   | 03/30/06
Hard to say... Wolfie2K3   | 03/30/06
Look from it at the bright side... Arnout Groen   | 03/30/06
Rats know when to abandon sinking ships. Mr. Roboto   | 03/30/06
Maybe, Arnout Groen   | 03/30/06
AMD to design a non-x86 chip? Roger Ramjet   | 03/30/06
risc and epic are moot markhahn   | 03/30/06
I not so sure Roger Ramjet   | 03/31/06
ISA becoming irrelevant markhahn   | 03/31/06

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

Ultraportables

advertisement
Click Here